![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been looking at some of the pics people at Oshkosh have been
posting and was wondering about the design of the flaps on some of these planes. Instead of the whole trailing edge of the wing hinging down like most planes I am familiar with, only the bottom skin of the trailing edge hinged down while the top surface was stationary. I was wondering what the advantages and disadvantages of this flap design are. -- Chris W "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
They are called "split flaps". Without going into a long winded explanation, the basic advantage is that they tend to be structurally stronger for a given level of mechanical complexity than many other more complex flap configurations. As a result, they can be generally extended at a higher speed than plain, Fowler, slotted, etc. designs implemented on "Experimental home-builts". If you crawl around aircraft at "AirAdventure", Sun-N-Fun", or one of the other major EAA fly-ins you can see that the extension mechanisms tend to be simpler and more direct than other designs. Also, since they don't interrupt the top surface of the airfoil there is no "air leakage" from the bottom of the airfoil to the top of the airfoil at the nose of the flap. When they are carefully designed and fabricated, the smooth mechanical interface with the wing will produce less parasitic drag when they are retracted than plain flaps. The whole purpose of "flaps" is to increase the effective camber of the wing which increases lift at slower speeds. This, of course, increases the induced drag and decreases the critical angle of attack of the now "modified" airfoil. Many general aviation flap designs can "droop" far enough where a point is reached where the combination of induced drag and parisitic drag is greater than the additional lift gained and then the hyper-extended flap acts as a speed-brake and permits a greater nose-down angle without gaining speed. In general, the disadvantage of a simple split flap is that the amount of additional "lift" versus "drag" that is created when they are extended is less than with other more complex designs. If you are interested in seeing some "numbers", there are studies published comparing the effects of different flap designs when used with specific general airfoil designs. Do a Google.com "advanced search" with "split flaps" as an exact phrase and "effect", "effects", and "comparison" in the "any of these words" modifier field. You will find a ton of information with graphs. J "Chris W" wrote in message ... I have been looking at some of the pics people at Oshkosh have been posting and was wondering about the design of the flaps on some of these planes. Instead of the whole trailing edge of the wing hinging down like most planes I am familiar with, only the bottom skin of the trailing edge hinged down while the top surface was stationary. I was wondering what the advantages and disadvantages of this flap design are. -- Chris W "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: One Design - DR107 | Bob | Aerobatics | 0 | August 28th 04 10:40 PM |
Novice question | Burt Tims | Aerobatics | 2 | November 21st 03 04:18 AM |
Structural adhesive question | BD5ER | Home Built | 1 | August 3rd 03 06:03 AM |
Fairing question... | Tina Marie | Home Built | 5 | July 16th 03 12:18 AM |
Brake line design question | Charlie Smith | Home Built | 0 | July 2nd 03 12:31 PM |