![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our club has an EW Model D logger. In the process of getting things ready
for flying this year, I got the loggers out, put in fresh batteries, and did a test run in the car. I got a strange altitude plot from the EW model D. It was very "notchy'' with the altitude not changing for several samples, and then jumping. This was true for both the pressure altitude from the internal sensor and the GPS altitude from the Garmin. Looking at the altitude graphs on SeeYou and at the actual log file in Notepad, I could correlate the "flat sections" with multiple sequential B records where the altitude would not change for either the pressure altitude or GPS. The pressure altitude only changes in increments of 5 meters. It is always a multiple of 5 meters. The GPS altitude is always a multiple of 10 meters. Anyone have any thoughts or suggestions? John Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Try removing the battery cover and inserting a piece of stiff wire (e.g.
straightened out paperclip) into the small hole in the panel that lies just behind the end plate. This will do a full system reset. David Starer "John Scott" wrote in message .. . Our club has an EW Model D logger. In the process of getting things ready for flying this year, I got the loggers out, put in fresh batteries, and did a test run in the car. I got a strange altitude plot from the EW model D. It was very "notchy'' with the altitude not changing for several samples, and then jumping. This was true for both the pressure altitude from the internal sensor and the GPS altitude from the Garmin. Looking at the altitude graphs on SeeYou and at the actual log file in Notepad, I could correlate the "flat sections" with multiple sequential B records where the altitude would not change for either the pressure altitude or GPS. The pressure altitude only changes in increments of 5 meters. It is always a multiple of 5 meters. The GPS altitude is always a multiple of 10 meters. Anyone have any thoughts or suggestions? John Scott |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Scott wrote:
Our club has an EW Model D logger. In the process of getting things ready for flying this year, I got the loggers out, put in fresh batteries, and did a test run in the car. I got a strange altitude plot from the EW model D. It was very "notchy'' with the altitude not changing for several samples, and then jumping. This was true for both the pressure altitude from the internal sensor and the GPS altitude from the Garmin. I'd expect that. From the manual, page 11 section 1.1.4 Altitude resolution: -350m - 10,000m: 5 metre steps 10,000m - 15,000m: 10 metre steps Looks to me as if your model D is working correctly. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 23:36 01 April 2007, John Scott wrote:Our club has an EW Model D logger. In the process
of getting things ready for flying this year, I got the loggers out, put in fresh batteries, and did a test run in the car. I got a strange altitude plot from the EW model D. It was very 'notchy'' with the altitude not changing for several samples, and then jumping. This was true for both the pressure altitude from the internal sensor and the GPS altitude from the Garmin.Looking at the altitude graphs on SeeYou and at the actual log file in Notepad, I could correlate the 'flat sections' with multiple sequential B records where the altitude would not change for either the pressure altitude or GPS. The pressure altitude only changes in increments of 5 meters. It is always a multiple of 5 meters. The GPS altitude is always a multiple of 10 meters.Anyone have any thoughts or suggestions?John Scott JohnYou have tested the system in a car, so the height changes are small and happen slowly. The model 'D' records in 5 metre steps, so what you describe is exactly what we would expect to see, there is nothing wrong with the unit.RegardsGraham Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS Colibri Logger V 3.0 | Tim Taylor | Soaring | 0 | December 21st 06 04:26 PM |
Looking for a Logger | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | August 3rd 06 05:47 PM |
Ted, your LX logger......... | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | June 26th 06 04:21 PM |
Logger | Ralf S. | Soaring | 3 | February 21st 04 04:49 AM |
Which Logger? | tango4 | Soaring | 15 | October 5th 03 01:12 AM |