![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Had another flying lesson today. The plan was to go back out into the training area again today. Instructor said we'd do some more forced landing practice, some more stalls, trying to get a wing to drop, which apparently doesn't happen real easy in the Gazelle, and we'd also do steep descending turns. The cloud base was rolling in, so the instructor decided we'd head out to the training area, and see if the conditions allowed us to get high enough to do what he'd planned. Well, at about 1400ft, someone put a white sheet over the cockpit, and we couldn't see anything, only for a few seconds. My immediate reaction was to look down through the window in the bottom of the door to try and see the ground. I was quickly told that that was not the thing to do, and to focus on my instruments if I ever found myself in cloud and couldn't see the horizon. It was my first time actually in the white stuff, and I have to say I didn't like it. It was very un-nerving. My instructor said that it was perfectly healthy to not be happy in the clouds when flying a VFR a/c. We decided to return to the airfield, so, my instructor asked me where the airfield was, and I correctly indicated the direction, although we were about 7 or 8 miles out by this stage, and it was not visible. Was also very hazy, which limited visibility a bit. I knew where the airfield was in relation to the lakes, so I knew I was headed in the right direction. Rather than land and drop the instructor off, so I could finish of the last 0.3 of an our I require to satisfy my solo time for the first part of the curriculum, we decided to stay in the air and do some precautionary searches. I quite enjoyed it. The traffic at our airfield was basically non-existant today, which made it perfect for what we wanted to do. First up, we did a circuit at 500ft, to check for no powerlines or other obstructions in the approach to the field. We did all this using our runway as the potential farmers field. Then we did a circuit at 200ft, to check for large obstructions like rocks, ditches, holes, boulders, or livestock etc. The last pass was at 100ft, to get a good look at the actual surface we were proposing to land on. A it was our usual runway, it was of course suitable, so we climbed once again to 500ft, and did a tight circuit to land. This was to be a short field landing. Instructor did the first one. As the Gazelle does not have flaps, it's basically just a slower approach landing. 55 over the fence instead of 60-65. We were pretty much full to the brim with fuel, so were close to maximum weight, so we didn't stomp on the brakes to stop, but it was clear we stopped a lot shorter than normal. Next we taxiied around again and this next take off was to be a short field take off, so we started from the grassy side of the runway. (The runway is grass and gravel). Heavy on the brakes. Ease u to full power whilst holding the brakes. Release the brakes, and feel the full force of the 80hp Rotax in action! Ahem! Where was I? Oh yes! Release the brakes and off we go! Full of fuel, with 2 on board, and I guess she took off a bit sooner than usual, but not by much! LOL! My instructor said that had I been in the a/c alone, I would have noticed how much sooner it took off. I'll have to take his word for it until the next lesson when I can try again. So, apart from the really weird feeling of being basically blinded for the first time in clouds, I felt really comfortable with my performance today. The flight felt more comfortable today than it has the whole time I've been learning. Don't get me wrong, I've been comfortable flying for quite a while now, but today I felt I was able to not only control the a/c and learn the lessons required for the day, but I was also able to keep my concentration whilst chatting to the instructor about things other than the lesson itself. I found myself actually enjoying the flight itself. That's a lot of 'itselfs' there, but I guess you know what I mean. My instructor said he's happy for me to go solo out in the training area now, so next lesson it'll just be a case of him handing me the keys and saying "Go fly somewhere for an hour!" That will be good! Total time now is 14.1hrs. -- Oz Lander. I'm not always right, But I'm never wrong. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/15/2007 8:02:49 AM, "Oz Lander" wrote:
It was my first time actually in the white stuff, and I have to say I didn't like it. It was very un-nerving. My instructor said that it was perfectly healthy to not be happy in the clouds when flying a VFR a/c. A very productive and eye-opening lesson you had there. I had the mindset during my private pilot training that inadvertently flying into a cloud would mean instant death that carried through the first time I was taken into a cloud during my instrument training. Upon reflecting on that, I now believe that every student pilot should be taken into the clouds by an instructor (on an IFR flight plan, of course) to demonstrate what it is *really* like and the importance of immediately switching to instruments in such a case. Is there a similar three hour simulated instrument requirement in your syllabus, too? Also, with winter approaching down under do you think you will be able to finish up your training before then? -- Peter |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
Is there a similar three hour simulated instrument requirement in your syllabus, too? Also, with winter approaching down under do you think you will be able to finish up your training before then? No there isn't Peter. Most RAA registered a/c only have minimal instrumentation. This particular a/c used to be GA registered, but is now only RAA registered, so it has all the instruments from it's GA days. The cloud foray was only through a few bottom 'legs' if you know what I mean. We were only 'whited out' for maybe 3 seconds or so. Long enough to teach me I don't want to go in there again in a hurry. For all I know, my instructor didn't stop me going through them on purpose. I live in Melbourne, so we are known for our changeable weather. It is said we get 4 seasons in 1 day. Quite often it's true. I only need another 5.9 hours minimum to get my ticket, and I'm not expecting to need much more than that. It has been said to me that you often get more good flying days in the colder months than you do in the warmer months here, so I'm not expecting it to be an issue. That doesn't mean it won't be an issue though! ;-) -- Oz Lander. I'm not always right, But I'm never wrong. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/15/2007 8:51:47 AM, "Oz Lander" wrote:
I only need another 5.9 hours minimum to get my ticket, and I'm not expecting to need much more than that. It has been said to me that you often get more good flying days in the colder months than you do in the warmer months here, so I'm not expecting it to be an issue. Wow, the the light at the end of the tunnel. Checkride soon! -- Peter |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
On 4/15/2007 8:51:47 AM, "Oz Lander" wrote: I only need another 5.9 hours minimum to get my ticket, and I'm not expecting to need much more than that. It has been said to me that you often get more good flying days in the colder months than you do in the warmer months here, so I'm not expecting it to be an issue. Wow, the the light at the end of the tunnel. Checkride soon! Yep! Gotta pass the BAK first though! Been years since I've had to sit down for an exam! -- Oz Lander. I'm not always right, But I'm never wrong. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:02:46 +0000 (UTC), "Oz Lander"
wrote in : the instructor decided we'd head out to the training area, and see if the conditions allowed us to get high enough to do what he'd planned. Well, at about 1400ft, someone put a white sheet over the cockpit, and we couldn't see anything, only for a few seconds. I presume your instructor did this under the authority of the provision in the regulations that permits the PIC to deviate from the regulations in emergency situations. :-) § 91.3 Responsibility and authority of the pilot in command. (a) The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft. (b) In an in-flight emergency requiring immediate action, the pilot in command may deviate from any rule of this part to the extent required to meet that emergency. (c) Each pilot in command who deviates from a rule under paragraph (b) of this section shall, upon the request of the Administrator, send a written report of that deviation to the Administrator. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/15/2007 11:26:18 AM, Larry Dighera wrote:
§ 91.3 Responsibility and authority of the pilot in command. Chris is learning to fly in Australia. I am pretty sure US Afars do not have authority there. -- Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/15/2007 11:54:57 AM, "Peter R." wrote:
US Afars Man I am a spaz. Sometimes it is wise NOT to click on the CHANGE spell checker option. -- Peter |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:55:00 -0400, "Peter R."
wrote in : Chris is learning to fly in Australia. I am pretty sure US Afars do not have authority there. I'm pretty sure that US FARs conform to ICAO standards, and would expect Australian regulations to also. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... : On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:55:00 -0400, "Peter R." : wrote in : : : : Chris is learning to fly in Australia. I am pretty sure US Afars do not have : authority there. : : I'm pretty sure that US FARs conform to ICAO standards, and would : expect Australian regulations to also. : Fortunately for us Americans, the FARs do not always follow ICAO 'standards.' Used to be we basically set the standards and those were adopted worldwide, but those worldwide 'standards' have been (IMHO) unnecessarily tightened up in the last number or years. Don't know about this particular case though... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
D.C. anti-war rally on C-SPAN today at 8:15 AM on the west coast of US and at 11:15 AM on east coast - President Carter at Brandeis on C-SPAN 2's 'Book TV' today at 12:30 PM (on the west coast and at 3:30 PM on the east coast): | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 27th 07 02:18 PM |
Had WAY too much fun today... | Shiver | Rotorcraft | 1 | October 19th 05 04:23 PM |
Today | Dave | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 28th 05 04:08 AM |
Two-fer today.... | Steve R. | Rotorcraft | 0 | March 4th 05 02:49 PM |
I'M GOING TO DIE TODAY. | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | February 4th 04 09:44 PM |