![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/030707/323/e3u6k.html
.... but of course they would be suicidal if they did try it, nuke-armed or not. Rob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Iran Capable of Hitting Israel
From: (robert arndt) Date: 7/8/03 9:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/030707/323/e3u6k.html ... but of course they would be suicidal if they did try it, nuke-armed or not. Rob The announcement was a tactical mistake. The Israelis are kings of the pre-emptive strike. Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ArtKramr" wrote The announcement was a tactical mistake. The Israelis are kings of the pre-emptive strike. Israel has the "you can't get there from here" problem with that scenario in Iran. They'd have to overfly either Saudi Arabia or US-controlled Iraq. The US certainly won't let a strike mission be flown under it's CAP while trying to get Iraq under control. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wolfie" wrote in message . com...
"ArtKramr" wrote The announcement was a tactical mistake. The Israelis are kings of the pre-emptive strike. Israel has the "you can't get there from here" problem with that scenario in Iran. They'd have to overfly either Saudi Arabia or US-controlled Iraq. The US certainly won't let a strike mission be flown under it's CAP while trying to get Iraq under control. Has any of you ever studied what exactly was there at Tuweitha in 1980 - and what can be found there in Bushehr, now? Obviously not. The Iraqis concentrated all their nuclear research facilities - a Soviet-delivered RTM, the French Osirak 1 and Osirak 2, the Italian-supplied gas-centrifuge, and all the training and research facilities - at one place. Their reactors were of the type used specially for the development of nuclear weapons - no "light-water" types there. In the case of Iran, all such facilities are doubled and trippled - and strewn all over the country: over 150 different facilities are involved in their projects, of which the most important ones are burried deep under the ground. The reactors being built at Bushehr are not burried underground, but of commercial, light-water, type and therefore not really instrumental - nor needed - for the development of any nuclear weapons. So, what can one conclude from this? Hit Tuweitha, and you destroyed everything (although, the Israelis actually only destroyed the Osirak 1, the rest was done by the Iranians in their "failed" attack). Hit Bushehr, and you haven't done anything - except caused an all-out war against Iran, which would foremost be fought by "non-conventional" means and that nobody can win. Tom Cooper Co-Author: Iran-Iraq War in the Air, 1980-1988 http://www.schifferbooks.com/militar...764316699.html Iranian F-4 Phantom II Units in Combat http://www.osprey-publishing.co.uk/t...hp/title=S6585 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Arie Kazachin) wrote:
Such increadible missions like attacking an Iraqi reactor or freeing hostages from Enthebbe look very "sexy" but they have a drawback: they can only be done once. Well, when something works 100% the first time, you generally don't have to repeat it... -- Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why the Royal Australian Air Force went for Israeli Python-4 AAM's over US AIM-9L's | Urban Fredriksson | Military Aviation | 79 | July 19th 03 03:33 AM |
Israel pays the price for buying only Boeing (and not Airbus) | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 57 | July 8th 03 12:23 AM |