![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
GPS has become the navigation tool of choice...
The jamming of GPS is so trivial that any reasonably bright 14 year old, can manage it - and within his allowance to boot.. Some older navcoms will jam the gps in the plane when tuned to certain frequencies... A quick google search on the radio models and those certain frequencies is enough information for one to build a wide area gps jammer... It used to be the gov't worried about a terrorist using the GPS to guide a weapon to a precise point... Whereas, they should worry about a terrorist blocking GPS over a wide area on a dark and stormy night, with airliners unable to land, ships losing navigation near the coast, etc... denny |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 22, 7:47 am, Denny wrote:
GPS has become the navigation tool of choice... The jamming of GPS is so trivial that any reasonably bright 14 year old, can manage it - and within his allowance to boot.. Some older navcoms will jam the gps in the plane when tuned to certain frequencies... A quick google search on the radio models and those certain frequencies is enough information for one to build a wide area gps jammer... It used to be the gov't worried about a terrorist using the GPS to guide a weapon to a precise point... Whereas, they should worry about a terrorist blocking GPS over a wide area on a dark and stormy night, with airliners unable to land, ships losing navigation near the coast, etc... denny They should but they probably aren't as much as some might think they should be, given the ability to mitigate against it. The old measures/ counter-measures game. The cool thing about a jammer, is that it has to emit something. A single source for wide-area jamming is fairly easy to detect. There's a company just north of here in Boston (Mayflower, used to be in Billerica, moved down the road to Burlington) that's got a design with phased arrays of antennae that are used to DF on the source, quite effectively. http://www.mayflowercom.com/products.html Happy mitigating ![]() Regards, Jon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon wrote:
On Aug 22, 7:47 am, Denny wrote: They should but they probably aren't as much as some might think they should be, given the ability to mitigate against it. The old measures/ counter-measures game. The cool thing about a jammer, is that it has to emit something. A single source for wide-area jamming is fairly easy to detect. There's a company just north of here in Boston (Mayflower, used to be in Billerica, moved down the road to Burlington) that's got a design with phased arrays of antennae that are used to DF on the source, quite effectively. http://www.mayflowercom.com/products.html Happy mitigating ![]() Regards, Jon I used to live in Billerica some 30 years ago. Bet it has changed. I am now down in north Texas. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:26:33 -0500, Ross wrote
in : I used to live in Billerica some 30 years ago. Bet it has changed. I am now down in north Texas. Are discussing GPS Jamming or the history of where you reside. :-( |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 22, 11:19 am, Jon wrote:
On Aug 22, 7:47 am, Denny wrote: GPS has become the navigation tool of choice... The jamming of GPS is so trivial that any reasonably bright 14 year old, can manage it - and within his allowance to boot.. Some older navcoms will jam the gps in the plane when tuned to certain frequencies... A quick google search on the radio models and those certain frequencies is enough information for one to build a wide area gps jammer... It used to be the gov't worried about a terrorist using the GPS to guide a weapon to a precise point... Whereas, they should worry about a terrorist blocking GPS over a wide area on a dark and stormy night, with airliners unable to land, ships losing navigation near the coast, etc... denny They should but they probably aren't as much as some might think they should be, given the ability to mitigate against it. The old measures/ counter-measures game. The cool thing about a jammer, is that it has to emit something. A single source for wide-area jamming is fairly easy to detect. There's a company just north of here in Boston (Mayflower, used to be in Billerica, moved down the road to Burlington) that's got a design with phased arrays of antennae that are used to DF on the source, quite effectively. http://www.mayflowercom.com/products.html Happy mitigating ![]() Regards, Jon A HARM missile tuned into the jammer's frequency would be a pretty effective deterent... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A HARM missile tuned into the jammer's frequency would be a pretty effective deterent... Well, any terrorist worthy of the name would locate the jammer on the roof of a hospital or school... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul kgyy wrote:
A HARM missile tuned into the jammer's frequency would be a pretty effective deterent... Well, any terrorist worthy of the name would locate the jammer on the roof of a hospital or school... Build about a dozen jammers and then launch them on weather balloons or magnetic mount them on the side of trains or trucks. A DF is useless against a moving target. GPS jamming is one reason ILS and DME will never go away. Not in my lifetime. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Detecting it is one thing, stopping it is quite another kettle of fish.
So tell you what, I'll give you a scenario, you give me your countermeasures and I'll defend against it. CW emitter using a watt of erp semi-isotropic radiation inside of a "static proof" bag (fairly decent radar stealth shielding at the frequency in question) in a plastic bucket under a helium weather balloon. Power source (inside the bag) is a small garden tractor 20 amp-hour battery. A watt of RF requires about 2 watts of dc power, or about 170 mA from the 12 volt battery. That's roughly 120 hours (5 days) of operation on a continuously moving target. Do a little winds aloft calculation when filling your balloon and you can drift them across the country, doing a wide area blankout for days at a time. Perhaps $1000 in parts at the outside and at that price I can launch one a day for what terrorists spend as chump change. Launch point can move 500 miles via automobile in a day easily. Jim -- "If you think you can, or think you can't, you're right." --Henry Ford "Jon" wrote in message ups.com... They should but they probably aren't as much as some might think they should be, given the ability to mitigate against it. The old measures/ counter-measures game. The cool thing about a jammer, is that it has to emit something. A single source for wide-area jamming is fairly easy to detect. There's a company just north of here in Boston (Mayflower, used to be in Billerica, moved down the road to Burlington) that's got a design with phased arrays of antennae that are used to DF on the source, quite effectively. http://www.mayflowercom.com/products.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Signal jamming a factor in future wars, general says" | Mike | Military Aviation | 23 | August 24th 11 02:17 AM |
USAF on jamming | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 1 | May 10th 04 10:55 PM |