![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There I was, flying along fat dumb and happy. I punch the mike button: "Auburn
Traffic, Fly Baby 848 turning downwind for touch-and-go." A voice comes up: "Fly Baby, you violated Class B Airspace!" It took me a bit aback. My home field is ~2-3 miles away from a ground-level extension of the Sea-Tac Class B, so one has to be a bit careful. But I've been flying from this airport for over 20 years; I've been careful. I key the mike: "I'm only a quarter-mile from the airport!" "You flew over Redondo!" Anyone flying over Redondo *would* be in Class B, all right. But that was four miles away. And I had just taken off! I had returned to the airport environs about ten minutes earlier (taking the careful route past the Class B) and had been shooting touch-and-goes since then. My guess is the guy saw someone in the distance go over Redondo, then tuned in to the CTAF at Auburn (S50). Since I was the next guy to call about entering the downwind, he assumed I had been the plane he'd seen. As I flew downwind, I noticed a red-and-white Cessna 180/185 go past about 500 feet pass overhead, flying to the Southeast. That's about the right heading for Redondo to Auburn, so I figured it was the plane the other guy had spotted. One interesting aspect: The guy making the accusation never gave his aircraft's call sign. Wonder if it was the guy *in* the Cessna, trying to find someone else to take the rap? :-) Ron Wanttaja |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Wanttaja" wrote: you violated Class B Airspace!" That's towards the top of the list of Things a Pilot Hates to Hear. My guess is the guy saw someone in the distance go over Redondo, then tuned in to the CTAF at Auburn (S50). Since I was the next guy to call about entering the downwind, he assumed I had been the plane he'd seen. Who cares what he thought he saw? He's not the FAA - screw him. One interesting aspect: The guy making the accusation never gave his aircraft's call sign. That figures. -- Dan "You were pretty hard on the Beaver last night, Ward." -June Cleaver |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that the lesson to be learned here is that you should never -
ever - respond to anonymous transmissions (for anything short of an imminent midair). Just ignore 'em David Johnson |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave,
I think that the lesson to be learned here is that you should never - ever - respond to anonymous transmissions (for anything short of an imminent midair). Just ignore 'em Fully agree. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 2, 9:57 pm, Dave wrote:
I think that the lesson to be learned here is that you should never - ever - respond to anonymous transmissions (for anything short of an imminent midair). Just ignore 'em David Johnson Agreed. Ignore transmissions, flight patterns, ATC instructions. Pay attention only to Phil Boyer. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skylune wrote:
On Sep 2, 9:57 pm, Dave wrote: I think that the lesson to be learned here is that you should never - ever - respond to anonymous transmissions (for anything short of an imminent midair). Just ignore 'em David Johnson Agreed. Ignore transmissions, flight patterns, ATC instructions. Pay attention only to Phil Boyer. Oh Skylune. All of the things you mentioned above are not anonymous transmissions. Unlike your posts. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
Skylune mouthed a bunch of hay and straw and brayed: On Sep 2, 9:57 pm, Dave wrote: I think that the lesson to be learned here is that you should never - ever - respond to anonymous transmissions (for anything short of an imminent midair). Just ignore 'em David Johnson Agreed. Ignore transmissions, flight patterns, ATC instructions. Pay attention only to Phil Boyer. Paying attention to Boyer sure beats paying attention to Skyloon! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skylune wrote:
Agreed. Ignore transmissions, flight patterns, ATC instructions. Pay attention only to Phil Boyer. Persnonally, I prefer Phil's speeches on auto-repeat via my Ipod and "Shameful" aftermarket aux. input, through my Bose headset with no aux. input or bass and treble contols. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, said:
There I was, flying along fat dumb and happy. I punch the mike button: "Auburn Traffic, Fly Baby 848 turning downwind for touch-and-go." A voice comes up: "Fly Baby, you violated Class B Airspace!" File an ASRS *right* *now*. -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ The biggest problem with democracy is that it is, in effect, the rule by the whim of the moment. -- Keith Glass |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Tomblin" wrote File an ASRS *right* *now*. You think so? If he is really 100% positive it was not him, then that should not be necessary. They would have to be able to prove it with radar tracks, right? I'm still not clear as to who it was that made the "you just violated..." call. If it was ATC, then a call to the supervisor might be in order, but otherwise, it didn't exist, IMHO. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale | >pk | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 06 07:48 AM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change? | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 0 | August 8th 06 02:42 PM |