![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My brother recently lost a friend of his in a diving accident. And my
brother, as a former sailor on the wreck that the accident happened on (HMCS Cape Breton), a local PADI dive instructor and an expert in deep diving techniques, had to go in to find the body after the RCMP tried for two days and couldn't find him. I was reading the forum posts about the accident, and somebody posted this. With a few substitutions, I could see this applying to us just as well. If I should die while diving. If I should die while diving please do not hesitate to discuss the incident and assess every element with a view to furthering your understanding of how to enhance diver safety. If I should die while diving get the facts. They won't be readily available and will definitely not be correct as reported by the media. But get the facts as best you can. If I should die while diving understand, as I already do, that it will most likely involve fault on my part to some degree or another so do not hesitate to point that out. If I should die while diving some of the fault will probably belong to my buddy and that needs to be honestly assessed as well though I must admit this is one area where I hope that compassion will be in the mix. If I should die while diving there might be those who try to squelch discussion out of a misplaced notion of respect for the deceased, family and friends. They can say nice things about me at my funeral... but in the scuba community I want the incident discussed. If I should die while diving at least I didn't die in bed. -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ Which ISPs provide write-only Usenet access? From the state of Usenet in general? All of them. -- J.D.Baldwin and Derick Siddoway |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
... If I should die while diving at least I didn't die in bed. Poignant words indeed. The last line makes for a fitting replacement for the ever clichéd "He died doing what he loved!", which always seems to rub people the wrong way for some reason. Crash Lander -- Straight and Level Down Under. http://www.straightandleveldownunder.net/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crash Lander wrote:
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... If I should die while diving at least I didn't die in bed. Poignant words indeed. The last line makes for a fitting replacement for the ever clichéd "He died doing what he loved!", which always seems to rub people the wrong way for some reason. Crash Lander The reason for this is complex and is much more deeply rooted in professional aviation than it is in general aviation as that relates to pilots who fly for pleasure. In the professional community, many pilots don't like this sentiment. First of all, it assumes that the person stating the sentiment knows or knew the pilot in question well enough to make such a statement and in almost every instance, this couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that most professional pilots, although we love to fly, live in a world of intense competition and self discipline where just doing the job right and keeping our necks in one piece takes up much of the time we could otherwise be spending on "feeling" how wonderful it is to fly. If and when one of us buys the farm, it's due to something that went wrong either with ourselves, our flying environment, and/or our equipment. In our world, what we do when this happens is come together like all normal people in aviation do, but you will seldom hear sentiments like "at least he died doing what he loved to do". What you will hear as we speak of a crash among ourselves are sentiments like "Damn shame. What went wrong?" If you are around professional pilots when a crash occurs, you should notice an air of silent respect interfaced with straight forward and pertinent questions. In our world a crash means something went wrong that needs correcting, NOW! The "he died with his boots on" thing just isn't our cup of tea, at least for the pilots I know and have flown with anyway. I've often said that if something went wrong and I dug a 10 foot hole in the ground during one of my displays, my friends and associates would be standing at the rim of the hole in about 30 seconds discussing what might have gone wrong..and that's the way I would want it to be. I'd want them to find out ASAP what happened so it didn't happen to someone else the next day. That's the way it is in the world of professional aviation.....at least in my little corner of it anyway. :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And then, Mr Dudley, there were John Gillespie Magee, Jr's thoughts on
your profession. I doubt you've lost that joy and awe. On Dec 5, 10:04 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: Crash Lander wrote: "Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... If I should die while diving at least I didn't die in bed. Poignant words indeed. The last line makes for a fitting replacement for the ever clichéd "He died doing what he loved!", which always seems to rub people the wrong way for some reason. Crash Lander The reason for this is complex and is much more deeply rooted in professional aviation than it is in general aviation as that relates to pilots who fly for pleasure. In the professional community, many pilots don't like this sentiment. First of all, it assumes that the person stating the sentiment knows or knew the pilot in question well enough to make such a statement and in almost every instance, this couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that most professional pilots, although we love to fly, live in a world of intense competition and self discipline where just doing the job right and keeping our necks in one piece takes up much of the time we could otherwise be spending on "feeling" how wonderful it is to fly. If and when one of us buys the farm, it's due to something that went wrong either with ourselves, our flying environment, and/or our equipment. In our world, what we do when this happens is come together like all normal people in aviation do, but you will seldom hear sentiments like "at least he died doing what he loved to do". What you will hear as we speak of a crash among ourselves are sentiments like "Damn shame. What went wrong?" If you are around professional pilots when a crash occurs, you should notice an air of silent respect interfaced with straight forward and pertinent questions. In our world a crash means something went wrong that needs correcting, NOW! The "he died with his boots on" thing just isn't our cup of tea, at least for the pilots I know and have flown with anyway. I've often said that if something went wrong and I dug a 10 foot hole in the ground during one of my displays, my friends and associates would be standing at the rim of the hole in about 30 seconds discussing what might have gone wrong..and that's the way I would want it to be. I'd want them to find out ASAP what happened so it didn't happen to someone else the next day. That's the way it is in the world of professional aviation.....at least in my little corner of it anyway. :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tina" == Tina writes:
Tina And then, Mr Dudley, there were John Gillespie Magee, Jr's Tina thoughts on your profession. I doubt you've lost that joy Tina and awe. I have not, but for some time have enjoyed W.B. Yeats thoughts too. It helps to know that this was written around WWI and that the Irish, like other members of the UK, have no love for the English. An Irish Airman Foresees His Death W.B. Yeats I know that I shall meet my fate Somewhere among the clouds above; Those that I fight I do not hate, Those that I guard I do not love; My country is Kiltartan Cross, My countrymen Kiltartan's poor, No likely end could bring them loss Or leave them happier than before. Nor law, nor duty bade me fight, Nor public men, nor cheering crowds, A lonely impulse of delight Drove to this tumult in the clouds; I balanced all, brought all to mind, The years to come seemed waste of breath, A waste of breath the years behind In balance with this life, this death. -- It is part of the general pattern of misguided policy that our country is now geared to an arms economy which was bred in an artificially induced psychosis of war hysteria and nurtured upon an incessant propaganda of fear. ~ General Douglas MacArthur |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
An Irish Airman Foresees His Death
W.B. Yeats Outstanding! I never thought I'd see the day when I would read my old friend Yeats in a thread on this newsgroup... Better knock it off -- If this keeps up we pilots will soon be accused of having some culture and class... ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tina wrote:
And then, Mr Dudley, there were John Gillespie Magee, Jr's thoughts on your profession. I doubt you've lost that joy and awe. I am struck with the humor I envision merely from the thought of beginning to recite "High Flight" during a pre-show brief of the Thunderbirds or Blue Angels, or at a meeting at NAFEC discussing why the #619 engine test bed F14 Tomcat was just lost as it spun into the bay. I'm wondering just how long I would have lived had I taxied out to do a low altitude display in one of our airplanes thinking to myself how wonderful it was just to be allowed to experience the joys of flight. I'm wondering if an airline pilot friend of mine who is flying today is sitting up there in the cockpit enjoying the world going by, or thinking about the approach he has to make in the next 30 minutes. I once sat in on a meeting with about 10 combat veterans, all fighter pilots, all aces, some several times over. The discussion was about survival in the combat arena. Probably the single most talked about factor in that meeting was the mental attitude of new pilots going into combat for the first time. The guys all agreed that most pilots going through the training program bring into the program with them, a feeling of high emotion concerning flying and wanting to fly. Almost to an individual, these newbies are flushed with the "excitement" and "wonder" of being one of the "lucky ones" accepted to flight training after fierce competition to get there. All the veterans agreed that probably the first thing that had to be accomplished with these newbies was to purge all that emotional feeling out of their systems; the sooner the better. There was and still is a critical reason for this. When you choose to fly airplanes for a living or fly airplanes in any high risk or extended exposure professional environment, the scenario involving the "emotional approach" to flying is best left on the ground if you intend living for any length of time in this environment. The long and short of it is that in the professional cockpit, there's little room for the "High Flight" types. The professional pilot has much more important things to be concerned with. As for the fighter pilots; it was the general consensus of the people in that meeting that the newbies flying into combat who were still enamored with their "wonder of it all" feelings about actually being there and involved, didn't last very long as a group. In short, they were the ones who got themselves killed early on after deployment into operational squadrons. All this I'm saying here doesn't mean that pilots like myself are cold and hard and that we don't feel things as other people do. What it means is that we might look at flying a bit differently than the average pleasure pilot. I happen to have a copy of High Flight hanging on the wall here in the den. I actually know people who knew the Magees in South Africa. The poem is a beautiful sentiment, but for pilots like myself, it's a private sentiment. I don't take things like this to work. During my years in flying, I've buried 32 of my friends and associates. It's a tough business where you are allowed emotion, but not at the office! I can give you a perfect example of what I've been talking about. I had a friend when I was younger, an ANG fighter pilot. He was killed flying an F86 Sabre when his engine threw a turbine bucket and exploded. He stayed with it too long, ejected low and out of the seat envelope and the chute couldn't deploy. The papers carried the oft used story in such situations about Jim staying with the airplane to avoid populated areas thus costing him his life. Even the ANG accident inquiry stated this as a probable cause of his death. Understanding that I loved this man, you can imagine how much this ending to his life meant to me. Many years later, acting as a flight safety advisor giving a safety lecture on low altitude emergency bailout, the issue of my friend's ejection came up in the Q&A. You can only imagine how difficult it was for me, now having thousands of hours of experience to stand there and contradict the accident report. The truth involved with low altitude bailout in high performance jets is that the pilot involved seldom has the time or even the inclination to either spot on the ground or attempt to avoid that "school house full of innocent children" down there. The pilot usually has his hands full controlling a stricken aircraft while trying to eject in time to save his own life. The simple fact is that unless the emergency is stable and the altitude situation dictates that the aircraft can be pointed to a large obviously open area, the pilot will have little control over exactly where the aircraft impacts the ground. In covering these aspects of low altitude ejection, I had to use the example of my closest friend as a negative example. I had to actually detract from what had been written about him to present a more reasonable probable cause. Knowing Jim, he would have wanted it this way, and this is but one example of the difference between flying for fun and flying professionally. -- Dudley Henriques |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On an IFR flight plan over PA last summer, maybe about 7000 feet, ATC
gave us permission to deviate. There were canyons of clouds to play with along our route. My husband uses an airplane the way most use a car, as a tool, but the pleasure of the moment was there anyhow. Come on Dudley, you've been there. That's blood, not 100 octane low lead, in your veins. Even professionals smile. I knew a Pole a long time ago who flew bombers during WWII from England to Germany, and he talked about flying along the top surface of cirrus clouds, right at eye level. Fully alert (there were people around who wanted to kill him), fully involved, and alive enough to remember the moment.. On Dec 6, 12:10 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: Tina wrote: And then, Mr Dudley, there were John Gillespie Magee, Jr's thoughts on your profession. I doubt you've lost that joy and awe. I am struck with the humor I envision merely from the thought of beginning to recite "High Flight" during a pre-show brief of the Thunderbirds or Blue Angels, or at a meeting at NAFEC discussing why the #619 engine test bed F14 Tomcat was just lost as it spun into the bay. I'm wondering just how long I would have lived had I taxied out to do a low altitude display in one of our airplanes thinking to myself how wonderful it was just to be allowed to experience the joys of flight. I'm wondering if an airline pilot friend of mine who is flying today is sitting up there in the cockpit enjoying the world going by, or thinking about the approach he has to make in the next 30 minutes. I once sat in on a meeting with about 10 combat veterans, all fighter pilots, all aces, some several times over. The discussion was about survival in the combat arena. Probably the single most talked about factor in that meeting was the mental attitude of new pilots going into combat for the first time. The guys all agreed that most pilots going through the training program bring into the program with them, a feeling of high emotion concerning flying and wanting to fly. Almost to an individual, these newbies are flushed with the "excitement" and "wonder" of being one of the "lucky ones" accepted to flight training after fierce competition to get there. All the veterans agreed that probably the first thing that had to be accomplished with these newbies was to purge all that emotional feeling out of their systems; the sooner the better. There was and still is a critical reason for this. When you choose to fly airplanes for a living or fly airplanes in any high risk or extended exposure professional environment, the scenario involving the "emotional approach" to flying is best left on the ground if you intend living for any length of time in this environment. The long and short of it is that in the professional cockpit, there's little room for the "High Flight" types. The professional pilot has much more important things to be concerned with. As for the fighter pilots; it was the general consensus of the people in that meeting that the newbies flying into combat who were still enamored with their "wonder of it all" feelings about actually being there and involved, didn't last very long as a group. In short, they were the ones who got themselves killed early on after deployment into operational squadrons. All this I'm saying here doesn't mean that pilots like myself are cold and hard and that we don't feel things as other people do. What it means is that we might look at flying a bit differently than the average pleasure pilot. I happen to have a copy of High Flight hanging on the wall here in the den. I actually know people who knew the Magees in South Africa. The poem is a beautiful sentiment, but for pilots like myself, it's a private sentiment. I don't take things like this to work. During my years in flying, I've buried 32 of my friends and associates. It's a tough business where you are allowed emotion, but not at the office! I can give you a perfect example of what I've been talking about. I had a friend when I was younger, an ANG fighter pilot. He was killed flying an F86 Sabre when his engine threw a turbine bucket and exploded. He stayed with it too long, ejected low and out of the seat envelope and the chute couldn't deploy. The papers carried the oft used story in such situations about Jim staying with the airplane to avoid populated areas thus costing him his life. Even the ANG accident inquiry stated this as a probable cause of his death. Understanding that I loved this man, you can imagine how much this ending to his life meant to me. Many years later, acting as a flight safety advisor giving a safety lecture on low altitude emergency bailout, the issue of my friend's ejection came up in the Q&A. You can only imagine how difficult it was for me, now having thousands of hours of experience to stand there and contradict the accident report. The truth involved with low altitude bailout in high performance jets is that the pilot involved seldom has the time or even the inclination to either spot on the ground or attempt to avoid that "school house full of innocent children" down there. The pilot usually has his hands full controlling a stricken aircraft while trying to eject in time to save his own life. The simple fact is that unless the emergency is stable and the altitude situation dictates that the aircraft can be pointed to a large obviously open area, the pilot will have little control over exactly where the aircraft impacts the ground. In covering these aspects of low altitude ejection, I had to use the example of my closest friend as a negative example. I had to actually detract from what had been written about him to present a more reasonable probable cause. Knowing Jim, he would have wanted it this way, and this is but one example of the difference between flying for fun and flying professionally. -- Dudley Henriques |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote in
: Tina wrote: And then, Mr Dudley, there were John Gillespie Magee, Jr's thoughts on your profession. I doubt you've lost that joy and awe. I am struck with the humor I envision merely from the thought of beginning to recite "High Flight" Mostly ~I just don't want them to think I ****ed up Bertie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote:
The reason for this is complex and is much more deeply rooted in professional aviation than it is in general aviation as that relates to pilots who fly for pleasure. In the professional community, many pilots don't like this sentiment. First of all, it assumes that the person stating the sentiment knows or knew the pilot in question well enough to make such a statement and in almost every instance, this couldn't be further from the truth. Well, first I posted a rather brusque response and then I read what you'd said. I've almost died twice in my life: once cave diving (oddly enough for this thread) and once in an airplane. I'd rather have a few seconds of terror followed by the deep peace that comes with acceptance of impending death than to sit in a nursing home waiting for my cancer to eat me alive. So yeah, I'd rather go doing something I enjoyed even if it caused me momentary pain. The alternatives aren't attractive. I used to joke that I hoped I would go out at the hands of a jealous husband but I believe the window of opportunity has slammed shut on me. Now the best I can hope for is to go in my sleep. Or doing something I enjoy.... I would fully expect folks to discuss and dissect such an event. And I'd hope others could learn something that might help them avoid a similar fate... -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|