![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 00:59:57 -0800, Hobo wrote:
I've read that the vertical tail buffeting problem on the F-22 prototype was solved by replacing composites with titanium spars. This makes me wonder why the titanium wasn't used in the first place. Was it cost/weight/stealth or something else? The same thing happened with the wing spars. They were all composite and apparently when they did the live fire tests on a fuel filled wing the composite spars got obliterated (did not degrade "gracefully" :-) ) So now every thrid spar is made of titanium. They didn't do this from the start because of weight. I imagine a machined titanium rib probably costs more than a composite one. Stealth had nothing to do with it as the spars are inside the wing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hobo" wrote in message ... I've read that the vertical tail buffeting problem on the F-22 prototype was solved by replacing composites with titanium spars. What you read is speculation that the titanium spar has fixed the F-22's structural integrity problem. There is no way for anyone to know that until the aircraft has flown at least 500 hours. This makes me wonder why the titanium wasn't used in the first place. The tail boom was stiffened in the first place and then an air damn was tried, but both failed to fix the "buffeting" problem. Was it cost/weight/stealth or something else? Shotgun, to fix a poorly understood problem. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|