![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Parowan offers not only outstanding soaring with plentiful landing
locations (for the most part), but it is also one long days travel from some 10 western states. The waiting list is gigantic............some 80+ last year! How do (did) we deal with all these folks that want to fly Parowan? Last year, everyone within region 9 was automatically in + another 5 reverse seeded pilots from outside the region. This resulted in an overloaded sports class that took up some 20 slots, leaving the other 3 classes to fight over the remaining 30 slots (50 max). Now, let's look at the sports class. We had quite a group with no experience, save a silver badge and who were they competing against? Top of the line; Striedeck, Wills, Harrison; Guys with high seeding, because that's what it took to get in! Is this what we want for our entry lavel competitor, raw recruits racing against national / international class pilots? I believe the rules committee dealt with this discrepancy in a fair way, let 0-50% from within region 9, with no questions asked, then let the individual seeding decide the rest. I was 68th on the list and got in just 2 days before it started. A couple of those already in had to drop out, one broke his bird and the other had job issues. Most couldn't drop everything, so the list quickly got to me at 68th. Those who couldn't drop everything were good pilots that really wanted to come, were they treated fairly? This problem only happens at Parowna and Mifflin and I say the Super Regionals is a good idea. Newbies, if you can't get into Parowan, come to Air Sailing for some "not so intense" entry level racing. JJ Sinclair |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If that part of the country is so good, have another contest at Ely!
Parowan is so tight, I understand one could not even fly there with a wingspan of more than 20 m? You guys just have to get your act together and arrange contests at Ely or similar. If pilots want to race there! One should not have to tell anyone to stay home? soarski On Dec 31, 12:07*pm, Bullwinkle wrote: On 12/31/07 11:37 AM, in article , "JJ Sinclair" wrote: Parowan offers not only outstanding soaring with plentiful landing locations (for the most part), but it is also one long days travel from some 10 western states. The waiting list is gigantic............some 80+ last year! How do (did) we deal with all these folks that want to fly Parowan? Last year, everyone within region 9 was automatically in + another 5 reverse seeded pilots from outside the region. This resulted in an overloaded sports class that took up some 20 slots, leaving the other 3 classes to fight over the remaining 30 slots (50 max). Now, let's look at the sports class. We had quite a group with no experience, save a silver badge and who were they competing against? Top of the line; Striedeck, Wills, Harrison; Guys with high seeding, because that's what it took to get in! Is this what we want for our entry lavel competitor, raw recruits racing against national / international class pilots? I believe the rules committee dealt with this discrepancy in a fair way, let 0-50% from within region 9, with no questions asked, then let the individual seeding decide the rest. I was 68th on the list and got in just 2 days before it started. A couple of those already in had to drop out, one broke his bird and the other had job issues. Most couldn't drop everything, so the list quickly got to me at 68th. Those who couldn't drop everything were good pilots that really wanted to come, were they treated fairly? This problem only happens at Parowna and Mifflin and I say the Super Regionals is a good idea. Newbies, if you can't get into Parowan, come to Air Sailing for some "not so intense" entry level racing. JJ Sinclair Just because Parowan is a great place to fly and people from outside R9 want to fly there, shouldn't give everyone who wishes to fly in our Regional the right to do so. The "problem" that was solved with the new rules is this: how to make it easier for outsiders wanting to invade the R9 Regionals and prevent R9 residents from flying in our own contest. I personally think the three you mentioned, plus all the others from outside R9, should stay home. Why not just have a National contest at Parowan every year to satisfy the easterners (and New Zealanders, apparently), and quit stacking the rules against residents of Region 9? Let our Regional contest be truly a Regional contest. This is manipulation of the system pure and simple, to benefit the few and discriminate against the little guy. Sorry, that's just my opinion. I respectfully recognize that others disagree.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 31, 5:14*pm, wrote:
If that part of the country is so good, have another contest at Ely! Parowan is so tight, I understand one could not even fly there with a wingspan of more than 20 m? You guys just have to get your act together and *arrange contests at Ely or similar. If pilots want to race there! One should not have to tell anyone to stay home? soarski On Dec 31, 12:07*pm, Bullwinkle wrote: On 12/31/07 11:37 AM, in article , "JJ Sinclair" wrote: Parowan offers not only outstanding soaring with plentiful landing locations (for the most part), but it is also one long days travel from some 10 western states. The waiting list is gigantic............some 80+ last year! How do (did) we deal with all these folks that want to fly Parowan? Last year, everyone within region 9 was automatically in + another 5 reverse seeded pilots from outside the region. This resulted in an overloaded sports class that took up some 20 slots, leaving the other 3 classes to fight over the remaining 30 slots (50 max). Now, let's look at the sports class. We had quite a group with no experience, save a silver badge and who were they competing against? Top of the line; Striedeck, Wills, Harrison; Guys with high seeding, because that's what it took to get in! Is this what we want for our entry lavel competitor, raw recruits racing against national / international class pilots? I believe the rules committee dealt with this discrepancy in a fair way, let 0-50% from within region 9, with no questions asked, then let the individual seeding decide the rest. I was 68th on the list and got in just 2 days before it started. A couple of those already in had to drop out, one broke his bird and the other had job issues. Most couldn't drop everything, so the list quickly got to me at 68th. Those who couldn't drop everything were good pilots that really wanted to come, were they treated fairly? This problem only happens at Parowna and Mifflin and I say the Super Regionals is a good idea. Newbies, if you can't get into Parowan, come to Air Sailing for some "not so intense" entry level racing. JJ Sinclair Just because Parowan is a great place to fly and people from outside R9 want to fly there, shouldn't give everyone who wishes to fly in our Regional the right to do so. The "problem" that was solved with the new rules is this: how to make it easier for outsiders wanting to invade the R9 Regionals and prevent R9 residents from flying in our own contest. I personally think the three you mentioned, plus all the others from outside R9, should stay home. Why not just have a National contest at Parowan every year to satisfy the easterners (and New Zealanders, apparently), and quit stacking the rules against residents of Region 9? Let our Regional contest be truly a Regional contest. This is manipulation of the system pure and simple, to benefit the few and discriminate against the little guy. Sorry, that's just my opinion. I respectfully recognize that others disagree.- Hide quoted text - Well I'm a bit torn on this one. I flew my first contest in 20 years at Parowan in 2004 and have flown there in 2005 and 2007. I'm from out of Region 9. I've gotten in every time, but it's always a nail biter, which is a problem given how much I have to plan ahead to take time off. Speaking pesonally, I am thankful to to have an easier time getting in as it is an exceptional soaring venue. I don't really agree that Parowan is not a good place for new contest pilots. In the west prety much all the sites have some rough terrain and I find Parowan to be more friendly than most. I also don't necessarily agree that newbies shouldn't mix with top pilots in the sports class. If top pilots elect to fly Duos and end up in Sports, that's a fine choice an it's kind of cool fo a newbie to go toe to toe with the top guns even if they kick your butt in the end (I am a personal recipient of said butt kicking at Parowan in 2004. I had a fine time just the same and I don't think I got in any one's way). I think it's not a bad way to get new folks up the curve a bit faster - have them fly with experienced pilots sooner rather than later. I guess I find the Super Regional idea feels a bit too much like it started with a particular end in mind, like "get the following guys in at Mifflin and Parowan". I would rather see some ability to admit out of Region pilots to ALL regionals while preserving the character of Regionals as stepping stones for pilots in developing contest flying skills. I think a longer lead time for a non-refundable deposit will eliminate a few casual entrants and avoid some of the "last minute shuffle" at the bottom of the entry list - that's probably a good thing for all concerned. I also think allowing some leeway for organizers to set minimum/maximum class sizes to balance the field and reserve a specified number or percent of spots as preferential for in-Region makes sense in general for regionals, not just for specific sites. That said, I expect the contest committee elected to do it the way the did for a reason, so I'm willing to see how it goes in 2008. 9B |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Soarski wrote........ One should not have to tell anyone to stay home? When a contest is over-subscribed, some MUST be told to stay home. The issue is how to fairly deal with all those who wish to enter. The entrant list spikes to over 80 just before the 60 day cut-off and then a good dozen or so drop out about 2 weeks before the contest. This "casual interest", isn't fair to those who really would like to fly, but aren't in a position to jump up and go, a day or two before it starts. I believe the proposed 50% rule deals fairly with both groups. Parowan was found and nurtered by region 11 folks and then region 2 folks (KS & crew) held the first regionals there followed by sports nats. I see the place as a national treasure, not unlike a national park, and should be made available to all. I say again.............good on ya' rules committee! JJ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah, one of my fav topix.
I lean with Bullwinkle on this one. I only agree with the Super Regional to a certain degree from an organizer's point of view; were I the organizer, I would want some leeway in the type of contest I was going to have. But it's an SSA sanctioned *regional* contest. That means something. Getting sanctioning means you have to satisfy someone else's requirements first, then do your own thing. The medals awarded at the end will still say "Region 9", not "Super Region 9". Maybe they should sanction/approve a "Super" regional only after a non- Super regional has already been scheduled in the same region. Even if I had a single-digit national pilot ranking, it should not be an automatic ticket to fly in every contest I like. ~ted/2NO |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 31, 12:27�pm, Tuno wrote:
Ah, one of my fav topix. I lean with Bullwinkle on this one. I only agree with the Super Regional to a certain degree from an organizer's point of view; were I the organizer, I would want some leeway in the type of contest I was going to have. But it's an SSA sanctioned *regional* contest. That means something. Getting sanctioning means you have to satisfy someone else's requirements first, then do your own thing. The medals awarded at the end will still say "Region 9", not "Super Region 9". Maybe they should sanction/approve a "Super" regional only after a non- Super regional has already been scheduled in the same region. Even if I had a single-digit national pilot ranking, it should not be an automatic ticket to fly in every contest I like. ~ted/2NO JJ, trust me on this. You can put a group together, call Dave at Parowan Air, and book your group over whatever period of days are available. You can even do it a year in advance to get the best time. He gives no preference to the contest folks. The contest folks just fill all the ramp spots plus some, so theirs no more room for a week or so. Your group can fly as much as they want, have nightly BBQ's and post your flights to the OLC for daily winners, You don't need a contest to go to Parowan. Ya, you can even play your own music to dance too. The folks who got into the 07 Parowan regionals, like the big guns such as KS and Wills/Newfield, Itner, and others, did so under our present rules. They choose what class they wanted to fly in. KS could of brought his 27, and I am sure the others could of gotten other rides. BUT they choose their toys for their reasons, and Sports Class was their choice. The winner of Sports Class in 07, was a quiet guy, came from within region, who flys with a big grinn, and whipped them all. They also were asked to help us set the place up for the racers, hold morning racing camps and be daily advisors for "lite". Because of them, I will be forever grateful. Not one of them ever complained, but I did get some strange looks ever so often. Gunter and Wolfgang ( hes ok now, but he became very ill) showed up, folks from Warner Springs helped out big time, as many did and we had our "girls for Nick". Also, within the region, I did get an angel, her name is " Mickie", and she was the one who really came forward and put in long hours for all of you. Ever racer that I remember asked if they could be of some help, all I had to do was ask. Folks make the place, and they are the ones who make it safe. That's a fact. Period. What I am getting at, JJ, is their really an answer for Parowan. Well, maybe, just maybe, as history has given us, are that the past Regionals and Sports Class Nationals, never filled up. Yep, never filled up. Maybe the answer is an earlier "full no refund entry fee" would be a better idea, as it would cause more to really "THINK" about it and giving more notice to those on the waiting list to move up. Maybe Parowan or Perry, or any other "oversubscribed contest" such as New Castle, the full entry fee should be required to be paid 60 days in advance and "no refunds except emergences unless deemed OK by the Contest manager" should be put into place, as a better idea. Thermal tight, Soar high, Fly safe, # 711 retired CM, born again racer. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am sure JJ is familiar with this option #711, since he was in the
group that we organized and brought our own tow planes when we first opened Parowan to big time soaring in the early 90's Retired Racer NK |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let me look at this another way... Pareto's law says that 80% of your
entrants are cannon fodder. The top pilots will always win, the 80 % guys will always lose. The BIG BUT in this is the unrecognised fact that the race is built on the backs of, and funded by the guys with no chance to win. Excluding these people is not the way to grow the sport. The guys on top need to recognise this, and while I respectfully disagree with both groups because they are drawing lines in the sand in different places, NOBODY has address the real fact. This race looks to be a priveledge instead of a right........... So why can't you have "qualifying" for Parawon. Seeded pilots have a process to do this at a national level. Region 9 pilots might want to consider a method to seed themselves so the guys putting in the time to "earn" the entry get in. As magnanimus as it sounds, the race is open to everybody, and maybe THAT in itself is the issue. There are some, like ME, a very low time beginner that could write the check to enter this thing, and probably have a great time, that are the wrong guys to be there. Gently filtering them out is critical to growing the event. Contests of this caliber are for competent cross country guys, not guys like me who just haven't got the experience........ Regional pilots need to be seeded and the organisers just need to ask how many of the local guys get slotted before accepting out of region contestants. It IS there contest after all...... I see the issue being Region 9's lack of a seeding process, and the non-9 pilots hard feelings at being excluded by the numbers. Both can be worked on..................... What does a guy like me do? I'm calling Karl to set up a "talking ballast" day..... Enjoy the new year. Scott. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
XYZ wrote:
Let me look at this another way... Pareto's law says that 80% of your entrants are cannon fodder. The top pilots will always win, the 80 % guys will always lose. The BIG BUT in this is the unrecognised fact that the race is built on the backs of, and funded by the guys with no chance to win. Excluding these people is not the way to grow the sport. The guys on top need to recognise this, and while I respectfully disagree with both groups because they are drawing lines in the sand in different places, NOBODY has address the real fact. This race looks to be a priveledge instead of a right........... So why can't you have "qualifying" for Parawon. Seeded pilots have a process to do this at a national level. Region 9 pilots might want to consider a method to seed themselves so the guys putting in the time to "earn" the entry get in. As magnanimus as it sounds, the race is open to everybody, and maybe THAT in itself is the issue. There are some, like ME, a very low time beginner that could write the check to enter this thing, and probably have a great time, that are the wrong guys to be there. Gently filtering them out is critical to growing the event. Contests of this caliber are for competent cross country guys, not guys like me who just haven't got the experience........ Regional pilots need to be seeded and the organisers just need to ask how many of the local guys get slotted before accepting out of region contestants. It IS there contest after all...... I see the issue being Region 9's lack of a seeding process, and the non-9 pilots hard feelings at being excluded by the numbers. Both can be worked on..................... What does a guy like me do? I'm calling Karl to set up a "talking ballast" day..... Enjoy the new year. Scott. Scott, There is a seeding process in place. The national pilot ranking system is used. Previously, the entrants are accepted as 1. In region pilots by seeding order 1a - some spots are reserved for reverse seeding order to let in some new guys 2. Any spots left for out of region pilots by seeding order. Ties broken by date of entry. This is slightly oversimplified, but its all detailed in the rules. The change is to reserve somewhere for 0-50% of the slots for in region pilots, still by seeding order. The rest from anywhere, again by seeding order. The issue the rules writers are dealing with is there are enough region 9 pilots entering that very few, if any spots have been left for out of region pilots. And they keep hearing the stories of how wonderful it is and want to play, too. Well, they are really trying to solve the generic problem with popular regional contests, not just Parowan and Region 9. It just has a bigger effect on the excluded Region 9 pilots than it might on pilots in the east half of the country where there are many more "nearby" regional contests to choose from. Distances between soaring sites and competition pilot population density is much lower out here. The oversubscribed regional is a fairly recent problem. The old rules have been in place for a long time, but the success of some sites and organizers in attracting entries have brought the rules into question. Its a nice problem to have, too many glider pilots, unfortunately its very localized. -Dave Leonard |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Freestate Regionals 2006 | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | April 10th 06 11:52 AM |
Lasham Regionals | Steve Dutton | Soaring | 0 | July 2nd 04 06:00 PM |
Lasham Regionals July 3 - 11 | Steve Dutton | Soaring | 0 | May 27th 04 09:34 PM |
Why no 18m class at Regionals? | John | Soaring | 7 | October 17th 03 02:41 AM |
Gransden regionals traces | Martin Gregorie | Soaring | 5 | September 8th 03 05:48 PM |