![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
from reading in the threads relating to nuclear war in the '80s, they mention "cobalt weapons". Can anyone explain what these are? I very vaguely remember a mention to them a book once but have no real idea. cheers dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Welch" wrote in message ... Hello, from reading in the threads relating to nuclear war in the '80s, they mention "cobalt weapons". Can anyone explain what these are? I very vaguely remember a mention to them a book once but have no real idea. cheers dan The theory is that if you put a cobalt sheath around a nuclear weapon you get lots of rather nasy cobalt 60 in the fallout zone. The doomsday merchants would have you believe this could wipe out all life on earth. The reality is nasty to be sure but not quite that bad. Keith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thanks Keith. I take it Co-60 is particularly nasty. I didn't know if the
whole idea of Cobalt bombs was enhanced blast, radiation, etc. Were Co-60 weapons developed / deployed? Cheers dan "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Dan Welch" wrote in message ... Hello, from reading in the threads relating to nuclear war in the '80s, they mention "cobalt weapons". Can anyone explain what these are? I very vaguely remember a mention to them a book once but have no real idea. cheers dan The theory is that if you put a cobalt sheath around a nuclear weapon you get lots of rather nasy cobalt 60 in the fallout zone. The doomsday merchants would have you believe this could wipe out all life on earth. The reality is nasty to be sure but not quite that bad. Keith |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Welch" wrote in news:3fd7c4ad$1_2@mk-nntp-
1.news.uk.worldonline.com: thanks Keith. I take it Co-60 is particularly nasty. I didn't know if the whole idea of Cobalt bombs was enhanced blast, radiation, etc. Were Co-60 weapons developed / deployed? Cheers dan "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Dan Welch" wrote in message ... Hello, from reading in the threads relating to nuclear war in the '80s, they mention "cobalt weapons". Can anyone explain what these are? I very vaguely remember a mention to them a book once but have no real idea. cheers dan The theory is that if you put a cobalt sheath around a nuclear weapon you get lots of rather nasy cobalt 60 in the fallout zone. The doomsday merchants would have you believe this could wipe out all life on earth. The reality is nasty to be sure but not quite that bad. Keith Cobalt bombs were to be extremely DIRTY enhanced-fallout bombs,Cobalt-60 being a hi-level radioactivity isotope. I don't know what the half-life is for it,though. Reasonably long,I suppose. It's used for food irradiation sources in the US. -- Jim Yanik,NRA member jyanik-at-kua.net |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Yanik" wrote:
| "Dan Welch" wrote in news:3fd7c4ad$1_2@mk-nntp- | 1.news.uk.worldonline.com: | | thanks Keith. I take it Co-60 is particularly nasty. I didn't know if the | whole idea of Cobalt bombs was enhanced blast, radiation, etc. | Were Co-60 weapons developed / deployed? | | Cheers | dan | | "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message | ... | | "Dan Welch" wrote in message | ... | Hello, | from reading in the threads relating to nuclear war in the '80s, they | mention "cobalt weapons". Can anyone explain what these are? I very | vaguely | remember a mention to them a book once but have no real idea. | cheers | dan | | | | The theory is that if you put a cobalt sheath around a nuclear | weapon you get lots of rather nasy cobalt 60 in the | fallout zone. The doomsday merchants would have you believe this | could wipe out all life on earth. The reality is nasty to be sure | but not quite that bad. | | Keith | | | | | | | Cobalt bombs were to be extremely DIRTY enhanced-fallout bombs,Cobalt-60 | being a hi-level radioactivity isotope. I don't know what the half-life is | for it,though. Reasonably long,I suppose. | | It's used for food irradiation sources in the US. And the original "cobalt bomb" was a cancer radiotherapy device. http://www.usask.ca/research/news/994316710.shtml |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jim Yanik wrote: Cobalt bombs were to be extremely DIRTY enhanced-fallout bombs,Cobalt-60 being a hi-level radioactivity isotope. I don't know what the half-life is for it,though. Reasonably long,I suppose. A little over five years, which makes for a very nasty fallout pattern. The thing is, you would have needed a *lot* of cobalt bombs to kill (or even seriously harm) all life on Earth. Outside of prompt fallout patterns, you wouldn't see a lot of cobalt-60 contamination (the jacket of cobalt would have been pretty inefficient at making the -60 isotope). Basically, every Soviet warhead would have had to have been coated with a hundred pounds or so of cobalt, and that was never going to happen. You couldn't get a single bomb to vaporize enough cobalt, either, even in the 100 megaton range. Due to the way weather patterns work, the southern hemisphere would have been mostly spared, too - you don't get a lot of mixing between north and south. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Yanik wrote:
"Dan Welch" wrote in news:3fd7c4ad$1_2@mk-nntp- 1.news.uk.worldonline.com: The theory is that if you put a cobalt sheath around a nuclear weapon you get lots of rather nasy cobalt 60 in the fallout zone. The doomsday merchants would have you believe this could wipe out all life on earth. The reality is nasty to be sure but not quite that bad. Keith Cobalt bombs were to be extremely DIRTY enhanced-fallout bombs,Cobalt-60 being a hi-level radioactivity isotope. I don't know what the half-life is for it,though. Reasonably long,I suppose. According to http://www.epa.gov/superfund/resourc...pdf/cobalt.pdf, 5.2 years. See also http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives...1111.Ph.r.html for the potential effects of Goldfinger's fictional, but quite nasty, cobalt/iodine weapon on the contents of Fort Knox, KY. /------------------------------------------------------------\ | George Ruch | | "Is there life in Clovis after Clovis Man?" | \------------------------------------------------------------/ It's used for food irradiation sources in the US. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Yanik" wrote in message .. . "Dan Welch" wrote in news:3fd7c4ad$1_2@mk-nntp- 1.news.uk.worldonline.com: Cobalt bombs were to be extremely DIRTY enhanced-fallout bombs,Cobalt-60 being a hi-level radioactivity isotope. I don't know what the half-life is for it,though. Reasonably long,I suppose. About 5 years IRC Keith |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Dan Welch" wrote: thanks Keith. I take it Co-60 is particularly nasty. I didn't know if the whole idea of Cobalt bombs was enhanced blast, radiation, etc. Enhanced fallout, mainly. Co60 is a gamma and beta emitter, with a half-life of about 5 years; pretty hot, and if ingested will dump most of its load during the ingestees normal life, assuming a sublethal dose. It's used for some medical applications. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"Dan Welch" wrote in message ... Hello, from reading in the threads relating to nuclear war in the '80s, they mention "cobalt weapons". Can anyone explain what these are? I very vaguely remember a mention to them a book once but have no real idea. cheers dan http://thomasmc.com/0828a.htm Here's some info you might find useful, Keith Willshaw notwithstanding... Rob |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIRCRAFT MUNITIONS - THE COBALT BOMB | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 1 | August 29th 03 09:22 AM |