We will all regret it, if John Kerry is not endorsed ! -he's the REAL FIGHTER !

Jack Nichols wrote:
I endorse Senator John Kerry for President and Senator John Edwards
for Vice President, and that is not a premature selection. It is what
Republicans fear.

So did you post this in honor of Kerry's birthday? (He turned 60 on
Thursday)

Not to mention it has sod-all to do with military aviation...

-Marc
--
Marc Reeve
actual email address after removal of 4s & spaces is
c4m4r4a4m4a4n a4t c4r4u4z4i4o d4o4t c4o4m

In rec.food.cooking Jack Nichols wrote:
Al Gore made a huge mistake when he endorsed Howard Dean.

I couldn't disagree more. Howard Dean is a breath of fresh air
for the Democratic Party. He has good ideas and he's not afraid
to speak his mind on liberal issues. Is Howard Dean the perfect
presidential candidate? No, but he's a heck of a lot better than
the other Democrats who're seeking the nomination, esp. Joe Lieberman
who's way too conservative for my taste.

In rec.food.cooking Jack Nichols wrote:
Al Gore made a huge mistake when he endorsed Howard Dean.


Gore is probably looking to 2008 and doing what Nixon did in 1964 by endorsing
Goldwater. Most pros could see that Goldwater stood no chance in the general
election so long as Johnson did not blow it. Johnson did not. Similarly Dean
stands no chance with the majority of the electorate who have not forgotten
9-11-2001 and want payback until terrorism is not a threat. Of course the
election is still Bush's to loose and the family history at least is not good
there. By endorsing Dean on the left of the party Gore will shore up his
position with the left wing in time to challenge Hillary in 08.

Also Gore makes a stand against the Clintons who are still trying to control
the Democrat party even though through thier control the Democrats have lost
the Presidency, the Senate and House and many governorships and legislatures
across the country. Many of the behind the scenes movers and shakers in the
Party are growing tired of the Clintons who always stand first for themselves.

John F'ing Kerry has no chance and is imploding more and more. Since the
election of Clinton a military record does not have the cachet it once had,
particularly one gained in a flawed losing effort, no matter how valorous the
individual effort. (Just ask Bob Kerrey MOH winner.) Kerry is Clinton with a
Patrician background. Kerry can't tie his shoes without a focus group for
advice and can never simply make a decision and stand by it. Kerry always
tries to get on both sides of every issue and that kind of phoniness draws
pretty thin with a war on.

John Dupre'

In article , wrote:



I couldn't disagree more. Howard Dean is a breath of fresh air
for the Democratic Party. He has good ideas and he's not afraid
to speak his mind on liberal issues. Is Howard Dean the perfect
presidential candidate? No, but he's a heck of a lot better than
the other Democrats who're seeking the nomination, esp. Joe Lieberman
who's way too conservative for my taste.


We've got about a month until the first caucuses, and I still don't know
what the Nine Mondales stand FOR. I know they are anti-Bush, anti-war,
and anti-tax cut, but they haven't proposed solutions. Don't you think
Hillary would have entered the race by now if all it took was to hate
Bush? I think so.

My prediction is that hating Bush just isn't going to be enough to carry
the Dems to the White House.

Kate