![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All,
Can anyone tell me in this day and age if it's practical to run a 135, IFR one-man, one-plane operation and make at least some money, considering insurance and FAA related red-tape that would accompany such an endeavor? If so, how many hours would one require (from a realistic perspective) beyond the 1200 required to act as PIC in a 135 operation? Would adding a second pilot increase the red tape exponentially? I assume there must be plenty of bush pilots flying float planes in Alaska doing just this same thing, right? --Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan wrote:
All, Can anyone tell me in this day and age if it's practical to run a 135, IFR one-man, one-plane operation and make at least some money, considering insurance and FAA related red-tape that would accompany such an endeavor? If so, how many hours would one require (from a realistic perspective) beyond the 1200 required to act as PIC in a 135 operation? Would adding a second pilot increase the red tape exponentially? I assume there must be plenty of bush pilots flying float planes in Alaska doing just this same thing, right? --Dan It *could* be practical if a series of circumstances existed for you such as: a) you have a ready, reliable and not too expensive IA/A&P that can work with you and keep you flying, b) you have a customer (or customers) that will guarantee you have work for the foreseeable future and c) you are happy working long and/or weird hours worrying about things that could go wrong for little money. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 1:04*am, Dan wrote:
All, Can anyone tell me in this day and age if it's practical to run a 135, IFR one-man, one-plane operation and make at least some money, considering insurance and FAA related red-tape that would accompany such an endeavor? *If so, how many hours would one require (from a realistic perspective) beyond the 1200 required to act as PIC in a 135 operation? Would adding a second pilot increase the red tape exponentially? I assume there must be plenty of bush pilots flying float planes in Alaska doing just this same thing, right? * * * * --Dan Three years ago my mechanic/fbo put a ton of money into an Aztec, hired a pilot, hired a firm to create the books, had the FAA in on 3 different trips inspecting the plane, the office, the books, taking the pilot for a check ride, yadda, yadda... Then once approved to operate 135 he began bidding for jobs... He found that the competition was playing hardball, even running a Learjet on jobs for less than he was willing to do with the Aztec, they often bid jobs for barely more than their fuel costs apparently losing money to establish rapport with the shipper... The competitors took jobs where they would be deadheading back after the run and still underbid him, plus they beat him to the punch by taking the run a half day sooner because he was still trying to find cargo for both directions... In the end he went belly up... If you are going to succeed you will do most of the flying yourself, you will need to be an A&P to hold your maintenance costs down, you will be ready to live out of the airplane yes, sleep in it for a week at a time as you hopscotch across the country taking cargo from a to b, then deadheading to c for a run to d, and so on, you will likely have to get by with only insurance for for PL & PD and take the chance you won't destroy the plane which means your family will have to front the money for the plane instead of a bank loan ... Other than that, it should be a piece of cake! denny |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 5:26*am, Denny wrote:
Three years ago my mechanic/fbo put a ton of money into an Aztec, hired a pilot, hired a firm to create the books, had the FAA in on 3 different trips inspecting the plane, the office, the books, taking the pilot for a check ride, yadda, yadda... Then once approved to operate 135 he began bidding for jobs... He found that the competition was playing hardball, even running a Learjet on jobs for less than he was willing to do with the Aztec, they often bid jobs for barely more than their fuel costs apparently losing money to establish rapport with the shipper... The competitors took jobs where they would be deadheading back after the run and still underbid him, plus they beat him to the punch by taking the run a half day sooner because he was still trying to find cargo for both directions... *In the end he went belly up... If you are going to succeed you will do most of the flying yourself, you will need to be an A&P to hold your maintenance costs down, you will be ready to live out of the airplane yes, sleep in it for a week at a time as you hopscotch across the country taking cargo from a to b, then deadheading to c for a run to d, and so on, you will likely have to get by with only insurance for for PL & PD and take the chance you won't destroy the plane which means your family will have to front the money for the plane instead of a bank loan ... Other than that, it should be a piece of cake! denny Wow! That sounds like quite a nightmare. Apparently aviation and successful entrepreneurialism do NOT go hand in hand. You paint a picture so bleak (and it might well be true) that it makes me wonder why anyone goes into aviation. I have a good paying job now, but I'd like to do something more fun when I get to a point in my life I can work and not be concerned with making top dollar (i.e. 10-20 years out). I'm trying to plan out how I might prepare for doing something in aviation. Currently, when thinking about what I'd like to do when I "retire" I think I'd like to fly a lot. However, it is expensive so it would be better to get paid to do it rather than spend big money on a hobby. I'm not sure the CFI route is for me. I prefer cross country flights with a definate destination. --Dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:37:49 -0800 (PST), Dan wrote in
: Currently, when thinking about what I'd like to do when I "retire" I think I'd like to fly a lot. However, it is expensive so it would be better to get paid to do it rather than spend big money on a hobby. If your motivation is revenue generation, consider real estate investment. If you start buying foreclosures, and put enough equity in them so that the rental income makes the mortgage payment, you will be able to leverage your equity investment's appreciation by something like 80%. Think about it. In twenty years, you'll have more money than you'll know what to do with, and owning some acreage with a private airstrip, hangar, and an airplane will be affordable for you. My 2¢ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 2:40*pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
If your motivation is revenue generation, consider real estate investment. *If you start buying foreclosures, and put enough equity in them so that the rental income makes the mortgage payment, you will be able to leverage your equity investment's appreciation by something like 80%. *Think about it. *In twenty years, you'll have more money than you'll know what to do with, and owning some acreage with a private airstrip, hangar, and an airplane will be affordable for you. * My 2¢ By the time you add property taxes, insurance, the time spent dealing with tenants, etc. could you really beat out other investments such as stocks and other equities? The closest I've come to real-estate so far are REITs. Has the method you described above worked for you? What is your average annual rate of return? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 1:40*pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:37:49 -0800 (PST), Dan wrote in : Currently, when thinking about what I'd like to do when I "retire" I think I'd like to fly a lot. *However, it is expensive so it would be better to get paid to do it rather than spend big money on a hobby. If your motivation is revenue generation, consider real estate investment. *If you start buying foreclosures, and put enough equity in them so that the rental income makes the mortgage payment, you will be able to leverage your equity investment's appreciation by something like 80%. * What about your equity? Doesn't it deserve a return too? You could put it in eTrade savings account and get 4% FDIC insured so why put it into real-estate hoping to just get your payment out of it?? -Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 3:46*pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
What about your equity? Doesn't it deserve a return too? You could put it in eTrade savings account and get 4% FDIC insured so why put it into real-estate hoping to just get your payment out of it?? -Robert Here's my recommendation - buy Garmin (GRMN). It's on "sale" right now. Forward PE = 14 with a huge growth rate. We all know that Garmin dominates the aviation GPS and avionics market, but their automotive products are top notch as well. --Dan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:46:03 -0800 (PST), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in : On Feb 20, 1:40*pm, Larry Dighera wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:37:49 -0800 (PST), Dan wrote in : Currently, when thinking about what I'd like to do when I "retire" I think I'd like to fly a lot. *However, it is expensive so it would be better to get paid to do it rather than spend big money on a hobby. If your motivation is revenue generation, consider real estate investment. *If you start buying foreclosures, and put enough equity in them so that the rental income makes the mortgage payment, you will be able to leverage your equity investment's appreciation by something like 80%. * What about your equity? Doesn't it deserve a return too? Huh? That's the whole point. Let's use $100,000 as the home price. If the real estate appreciates at 10% annually, with a 20% down payment (the equity), you are able to realize a gain of, not 10% of $20,000 ($2,000), but 10% of $100,000 ($10,000) annually. You could put it in eTrade savings account and get 4% FDIC insured so why put it into real-estate hoping to just get your payment out of it?? For the appreciation in property value. The rent payment just covers your costs (approximately) over the life of the investment. Real estate goes up and down, but over the long run, .... With the rate of population growth worldwide, I don't see how it can miss. The only true downside is the lack of liquidity, but that's not really an issue for retirement income. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An-2 starting | Jaroslaw Manek | Aviation Photos | 0 | May 27th 07 08:30 PM |
Starting at the right age | Photoplasm | Aviation Photos | 4 | April 24th 07 08:37 PM |
Just starting out... | Jase Vanover | Piloting | 20 | April 24th 05 08:23 PM |
Starting FS9 | Hector Relva | Simulators | 1 | September 22nd 03 02:21 PM |
Boeing 307 Starting Up! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 5 | August 8th 03 06:53 PM |