Bush admits he wanted regime change before 11 September

From: "George Z. Bush" am


The significance of that glitch is that he must have been speaking with
forked tongue during his election campaign, which meant that he was willing to
lie to the voters in order to earn their support. And if that's not true, then
he's
lying now in claiming an early need for regime change in Iraq.

It's got to be one or the other.....you can't have it both ways.
Truthfulness does not seem to be one of our President's virtues.

George Z.

Or any other president so why bother bringing it up?

Our last one was impeached for lying and Nixon was for resign for lying.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

B2431 wrote:

From: "George Z. Bush" am





The significance of that glitch is that he must have been speaking with
forked tongue during his election campaign, which meant that he was willing to


lie to the voters in order to earn their support. And if that's not true, then
he's


lying now in claiming an early need for regime change in Iraq.

It's got to be one or the other.....you can't have it both ways.
Truthfulness does not seem to be one of our President's virtues.

George Z.



Or any other president so why bother bringing it up?

Our last one was impeached for lying and Nixon was for resign for lying.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired


Hmmm, maybe nothing ever changes?!? Once a president says something, it
is set in stone?!? Where I'm at, priorities change on a daily basis.
Lying is one thing, priority changes are a completely different thing.

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:34:17 +1100, David Bromage wrote:

Hugo S. Cunningham wrote:
Were we going to buy political ads on Iraqi television asking Iraqi
voters to vote against Saddam at the next election?

Anything is for sale. Just depends how much you are prepared to spend.

You could have easily offered Saddam, Uday and Qusay a 9 or 10 figure
sum in a Swiss bank account of their choice on condition they sod off to
some tropical island and stay there. That would have cost less than the war.

Cheers
David

That is not how megalomaniacal dictators operate

Al Minyard

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:13:59 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:


"John Mullen" wrote in message
...

If it was only one country, you'd be right. But since the Monroe
Doctrine, you've been regularly invading other countries in the name of
Freedom and Democracy, often leaving them less free and less democratic
than before. I can provide a list if you like, but I'm sure that you
know what I'm talking about. That is a definition of Empire.


I don't know what you're talking about. Please provide that list.

He must be thinking of all of the troops we sent to "invade" the UK
1n 1943-44.

Al Minyard