![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many of you may not know these places by the phrase "141 school" so I
will give you some great ways to spot them. If the school is a university flight department, if the name includes the word Academy, or if their ad says anything that refers to training pilots for an airline position it is a 141 school and you should carefully consider sending anyone there. Here¡¦s your quick evaluation test: Do I want my offspring to be a pilot or do I want them to be a regulation expert with average skills? If it¡¦s the first, you should consider finding another school. Now if you happen to be a 141 graduate, please do not take this personally. I know many pilots who made it through a 141 school without the skills learned prior being stripped from them. If you are a 141 grad and you get this newsletter, you likely know better than anyone what I am talking about. And if you run a 141 school, there is a chance you are one of the few who have received FAA approval despite your good reputation. With that said, let¡¦s get to the meat of the subject. Why do people go to these schools and why do flight schools go to a 141 method of training? 141 Schools are typically accelerated programs that are eligible for government grants, and whose students are eligible for student loans. For this reason, it is very hard for me to blame a flight school that chooses this route as it is sure to guarantee more income. Likewise it is hard for me to blame students as they are apt to seek out the quickest route through training. But does this encourage the best training? Because these programs are FAA sanctioned, these schools tend to focus first on regulation, preparation for the airlines, and all the ways you can get violated instead of how to fly an airplane well. Due to this, the typical 141 graduate is an amazing encyclopedia of regulation that can tell you what page and paragraph of the FAA bible describes the current situation while simultaneously freezing at the yoke because they have no idea how to read the weather ahead. But, as you fly headlong into a level 5 or try to convince them you don¡¦t need to deviate a hundred miles around a cloud the size of a VW Beetle, they WILL tell you the technical term for that specific type of cloud. Did you realize that a 141 school student: ¡E can get a full license in less hours ¡E can become a CFI in less hours ¡E is teaching the next class of students ¡E is allowed to do this because the program is a certified FAA approved program Knowing pilots are inherently cheap, I can confidently say that most are tempted to get excited about fewer training hours but answer these questions: How many of the ¡§highest quality products¡¨ in the world come from ¡§sweatshops¡¨ or the phrase ¡§FAA approved", how many high schools let sophomores teach the freshman, and how many people put their best into ¡§sweatshop¡¨ style jobs? NONE¡K¡Kand WHY? Do I really have to explain?. Strangely, it is never advertised that most 141 students don¡¦t actually earn those ratings quicker. Yet with all this, those at the top of aviation continue to support these schools in the interest of pumping out pilots. ON the positive side, I have flown with many 141 graduates and most of them have a great pilot inside dying to come out. In fact, many of them have great unused skills and knowledge. The only problem is that their school did them a disservice in their training. Years ago when I was spending the winter in the Keys, I helped pump gas at an FBO and was witness to one of the most ridiculous aviation spectacles ever seen. Back then most every Saturday brought a flight of 10-15 Embry Riddle planes to the Marathon airport that would somehow arrive together. I watched this over and over trying to figure it out until I had to ask one of the student pilots what was going on. It turned out they were doing their long cross countries to one of two syllabus approved airports; DAYTONA TO MARATHON KEY. Go look at a map and tell me what you would learn doing this long cross country, flying down the beach in formation with 12 or so others, while following the wealthiest airline offspring who happens to have a GPS . Today whenever I run into an Embry grad I mention this to them and they all know exactly what I am talking about. But what you may have missed in this example was the fact that these schools are pumping out pilots like crazy. This is a great opportunity in disguise. Our aviation organizations need to be bringing these pilots into our flock with the intention of making ¡§real pilots¡¨ out of them. If this were the case, we could have many more people on our side. The option is to have a future majority of pilots who say scary things like ¡§ I will never fly another small plane¡¨ and who will gladly sell out our freedoms and theirs to go along with an airlines efforts to get user fees passed. All because they believe it will save their jobs. These are the pilots of tomorrow. Bring them in or be cursed by them later. Is there anything else that could be done? As long as the FAA continues to support (promote) these programs it is unlikely. But if aviation as a whole would insist on a change in their methods, something could be done. My suggestions would be to make the hour requirement for a CFI higher, and make any flight school eligible to instruct and receive payment from students using student loans and grants. This would encourage a more professional and qualified group of instructors and create the opportunity for students to learn from smaller flying oriented organizations. Once again, we find ourselves asking "Why is it so?" . . . |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dear Mr. Pie, You seem to have a problem with 141 schools. Do you have a clue as to what a school must to to be a Part 141 school? If not http://www.gofir.com/fars/part141/frame.htm Just like Part 61 there are good and there are bad. RC_Moonpie wrote: Did you realize that a 141 school student: ‧ can get a full license in less hours ‧ can become a CFI in less hours ‧ is teaching the next class of students ‧ is allowed to do this because the program is a certified FAA approved program |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please observe the oxygen requirements in the regs.
-- Regards, BobF. "RC_Moonpie" wrote in message ... Many of you may not know these places by the phrase "141 school" so I will give you some great ways to spot them. If the school is a university flight department, if the name includes the word Academy, or if their ad says anything that refers to training pilots for an airline position it is a 141 school and you should carefully consider sending anyone there. Here¡¦s your quick evaluation test: Do I want my offspring to be a pilot or do I want them to be a regulation expert with average skills? If it¡¦s the first, you should consider finding another school. Now if you happen to be a 141 graduate, please do not take this personally. I know many pilots who made it through a 141 school without the skills learned prior being stripped from them. If you are a 141 grad and you get this newsletter, you likely know better than anyone what I am talking about. And if you run a 141 school, there is a chance you are one of the few who have received FAA approval despite your good reputation. With that said, let¡¦s get to the meat of the subject. Why do people go to these schools and why do flight schools go to a 141 method of training? 141 Schools are typically accelerated programs that are eligible for government grants, and whose students are eligible for student loans. For this reason, it is very hard for me to blame a flight school that chooses this route as it is sure to guarantee more income. Likewise it is hard for me to blame students as they are apt to seek out the quickest route through training. But does this encourage the best training? Because these programs are FAA sanctioned, these schools tend to focus first on regulation, preparation for the airlines, and all the ways you can get violated instead of how to fly an airplane well. Due to this, the typical 141 graduate is an amazing encyclopedia of regulation that can tell you what page and paragraph of the FAA bible describes the current situation while simultaneously freezing at the yoke because they have no idea how to read the weather ahead. But, as you fly headlong into a level 5 or try to convince them you don¡¦t need to deviate a hundred miles around a cloud the size of a VW Beetle, they WILL tell you the technical term for that specific type of cloud. Did you realize that a 141 school student: ¡E can get a full license in less hours ¡E can become a CFI in less hours ¡E is teaching the next class of students ¡E is allowed to do this because the program is a certified FAA approved program Knowing pilots are inherently cheap, I can confidently say that most are tempted to get excited about fewer training hours but answer these questions: How many of the ¡§highest quality products¡¨ in the world come from ¡§sweatshops¡¨ or the phrase ¡§FAA approved", how many high schools let sophomores teach the freshman, and how many people put their best into ¡§sweatshop¡¨ style jobs? NONE¡K¡Kand WHY? Do I really have to explain?. Strangely, it is never advertised that most 141 students don¡¦t actually earn those ratings quicker. Yet with all this, those at the top of aviation continue to support these schools in the interest of pumping out pilots. ON the positive side, I have flown with many 141 graduates and most of them have a great pilot inside dying to come out. In fact, many of them have great unused skills and knowledge. The only problem is that their school did them a disservice in their training. Years ago when I was spending the winter in the Keys, I helped pump gas at an FBO and was witness to one of the most ridiculous aviation spectacles ever seen. Back then most every Saturday brought a flight of 10-15 Embry Riddle planes to the Marathon airport that would somehow arrive together. I watched this over and over trying to figure it out until I had to ask one of the student pilots what was going on. It turned out they were doing their long cross countries to one of two syllabus approved airports; DAYTONA TO MARATHON KEY. Go look at a map and tell me what you would learn doing this long cross country, flying down the beach in formation with 12 or so others, while following the wealthiest airline offspring who happens to have a GPS . Today whenever I run into an Embry grad I mention this to them and they all know exactly what I am talking about. But what you may have missed in this example was the fact that these schools are pumping out pilots like crazy. This is a great opportunity in disguise. Our aviation organizations need to be bringing these pilots into our flock with the intention of making ¡§real pilots¡¨ out of them. If this were the case, we could have many more people on our side. The option is to have a future majority of pilots who say scary things like ¡§ I will never fly another small plane¡¨ and who will gladly sell out our freedoms and theirs to go along with an airlines efforts to get user fees passed. All because they believe it will save their jobs. These are the pilots of tomorrow. Bring them in or be cursed by them later. Is there anything else that could be done? As long as the FAA continues to support (promote) these programs it is unlikely. But if aviation as a whole would insist on a change in their methods, something could be done. My suggestions would be to make the hour requirement for a CFI higher, and make any flight school eligible to instruct and receive payment from students using student loans and grants. This would encourage a more professional and qualified group of instructors and create the opportunity for students to learn from smaller flying oriented organizations. Once again, we find ourselves asking "Why is it so?" . . . |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 28, 12:53*pm, RC_Moonpie wrote:
Many of you may not know these places by the phrase "141 school" so I will give you some great ways to spot them. * If the school is a university flight department, if the name includes the word Academy, *or if their ad says anything that refers to training pilots for an airline position it is a 141 school and you should carefully consider sending anyone there. * * No. A 141 school is a flight school that holds an FAA part 141 certificate. Universities may or may not hold 141 certificates. The main benefit of part 141 is the ability to finance through VA loans. You can also get an instrument rating without the 50 hours cross country time. Otherwise, its about the same for students. You cannot tell if an operation is part 141 without asking or looking them up at your FSDO. -Robert, CFII |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:15:18 -0700 (PDT), Robert M. Gary wrote:
On Apr 28, 12:53*pm, RC_Moonpie wrote: Many of you may not know these places by the phrase "141 school" so I will give you some great ways to spot them. * If the school is a university flight department, if the name includes the word Academy, *or if their ad says anything that refers to training pilots for an airline position it is a 141 school and you should carefully consider sending anyone there. * * No. A 141 school is a flight school that holds an FAA part 141 certificate. Universities may or may not hold 141 certificates. The main benefit of part 141 is the ability to finance through VA loans. You can also get an instrument rating without the 50 hours cross country time. Otherwise, its about the same for students. You cannot tell if an operation is part 141 without asking or looking them up at your FSDO. -Robert, CFII http://www.leebottom.com/nordo/ARCHIVES/dec2005.htm |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 1, 11:26*am, RC_Moonpie wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:15:18 -0700 (PDT), Robert M. Gary wrote: http://www.leebottom.com/nordo/ARCHIVES/dec2005.htm- Hide quoted text - Posting your opinion on the internet doesn't make it true. It still does not show any evidence or studies to say that 141 schools are not great. It also includes numerous factual errors. -Robert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RC_Moonpie wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:15:18 -0700 (PDT), Robert M. Gary wrote: On Apr 28, 12:53 pm, RC_Moonpie wrote: Many of you may not know these places by the phrase "141 school" so I will give you some great ways to spot them. If the school is a university flight department, if the name includes the word Academy, or if their ad says anything that refers to training pilots for an airline position it is a 141 school and you should carefully consider sending anyone there. No. A 141 school is a flight school that holds an FAA part 141 certificate. Universities may or may not hold 141 certificates. The main benefit of part 141 is the ability to finance through VA loans. You can also get an instrument rating without the 50 hours cross country time. Otherwise, its about the same for students. You cannot tell if an operation is part 141 without asking or looking them up at your FSDO. -Robert, CFII http://www.leebottom.com/nordo/ARCHIVES/dec2005.htm You do realize that those same freshly certificated CFIs can train under Part 61 as well don't you? At least at a Part 141 school they are supervised by a chief instructor who... (b) For a course of training leading to the issuance of a recreational or private pilot certificate or rating, a chief instructor must have: (1) At least 1,000 hours as pilot in command; and (2) Primary flight training experience, acquired as either a certificated flight instructor or an instructor in a military pilot flight training program, or a combination thereof, consisting of at least— (i) 2 years and a total of 500 flight hours; or (ii) 1,000 flight hours. (c) For a course of training leading to the issuance of an instrument rating or a rating with instrument privileges, a chief instructor must have: (1) At least 100 hours of flight time under actual or simulated instrument conditions; (2) At least 1,000 hours as pilot in command; and (3) Instrument flight instructor experience, acquired as either a certificated flight instructor-instrument or an instructor in a military pilot flight training program, or a combination thereof, consisting of at least— (i) 2 years and a total of 250 flight hours; or (ii) 400 flight hours. (d) For a course of training other than one leading to the issuance of a recreational or private pilot certificate or rating, or an instrument rating or a rating with instrument privileges, a chief instructor must have: (1) At least 2,000 hours as pilot in command; and (2) Flight training experience, acquired as either a certificated flight instructor or an instructor in a military pilot flight training program, or a combination thereof, consisting of at least— (i) 3 years and a total of 1,000 flight hours; or (ii) 1,500 flight hours. (e) To be eligible for designation as chief instructor for a ground school course, a person must have 1 year of experience as a ground school instructor at a certificated pilot school. An even the assistant chief instructor at a part 141 school must... (b) For a course of training leading to the issuance of a recreational or private pilot certificate or rating, an assistant chief instructor must have: (1) At least 500 hours as pilot in command; and VerDate Dec132002 14:30 Jan 18, 2003 Jkt 200043 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200043T.XXX 200043T 11 Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 141.37 (2) Flight training experience, acquired as either a certificated flight instructor or an instructor in a military pilot flight training program, or a combination thereof, consisting of at least— (i) 1 year and a total of 250 flight hours; or (ii) 500 flight hours. (c) For a course of training leading to the issuance of an instrument rating or a rating with instrument privileges, an assistant chief flight instructor must have: (1) At least 50 hours of flight time under actual or simulated instrument conditions; (2) At least 500 hours as pilot in command; and (3) Instrument flight instructor experience, acquired as either a certificated flight instructor-instrument or an instructor in a military pilot flight training program, or a combination thereof, consisting of at least— (i) 1 year and a total of 125 flight hours; or (ii) 200 flight hours. (d) For a course of training other than one leading to the issuance of a recreational or private pilot certificate or rating, or an instrument rating or a rating with instrument privileges, an assistant chief instructor must have: (1) At least 1,000 hours as pilot in command; and (2) Flight training experience, acquired as either a certificated flight instructor or an instructor in a military pilot flight training program, or a combination thereof, consisting of at least— (i) 11?2 years and a total of 500 flight hours; or (ii) 750 flight hours. (e) To be eligible for designation as an assistant chief instructor for a ground school course, a person must have 6 months of experience as a ground school instructor at a certificated pilot school. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 May 2008 15:18:13 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
No. A 141 school is a flight school that holds an FAA part 141 certificate. Universities may or may not hold 141 certificates. The main benefit of part 141 is the ability to finance through VA loans. You can also get an instrument rating without the 50 hours cross country time. Otherwise, its about the same for students. You cannot tell if an operation is part 141 without asking or looking them up at your FSDO. -Robert, CFII http://www.leebottom.com/nordo/ARCHIVES/dec2005.htm You do realize that those same freshly certificated CFIs can train under Part 61 as well don't you? At least at a Part 141 school they are supervised by a chief instructor who... snipped rambling bull**** Do you relly think I was going to read all that crap? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RC_Moonpie wrote:
On Thu, 01 May 2008 15:18:13 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote: No. A 141 school is a flight school that holds an FAA part 141 certificate. Universities may or may not hold 141 certificates. The main benefit of part 141 is the ability to finance through VA loans. You can also get an instrument rating without the 50 hours cross country time. Otherwise, its about the same for students. You cannot tell if an operation is part 141 without asking or looking them up at your FSDO. -Robert, CFII http://www.leebottom.com/nordo/ARCHIVES/dec2005.htm You do realize that those same freshly certificated CFIs can train under Part 61 as well don't you? At least at a Part 141 school they are supervised by a chief instructor who... snipped rambling bull**** Do you relly think I was going to read all that crap? I assume you are classifying as rambling bull**** the FAR which govern something you seem to have such a hard-on about, so yes one would hope that if you were interested enough to come out of the woodwork and bash something that you would take the couple of minutes to read the regulation. THe fact that you didn't says a lot about you. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 28, 12:53 pm, RC_Moonpie wrote:
Did you realize that a 141 school student: ¡E can get a full license in less hours ¡E can become a CFI in less hours ¡E is teaching the next class of students ¡E is allowed to do this because the program is a certified FAA approved program This is very odd considering the FAA has never issued a license to anyone. Technically you can earn your private pilot certificate in 35 hrs vs 40 at a 141 school but I've only met one student in my life who took a checkride with less than 40 hours. The rest of what you say is just plain baseless crap. You site no studies or statistics to prove your point because there are none. -Robert, CFII |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying Schools in the U.S. | [email protected] | Piloting | 12 | October 6th 06 03:54 AM |
On flying schools in the US | [email protected] | Piloting | 4 | May 4th 06 10:42 AM |
UK Gliding schools | Trevor Bailey | Soaring | 9 | January 3rd 06 11:05 PM |
Deciding between two schools. | John | Rotorcraft | 0 | August 16th 04 04:55 AM |
Schools | timeh | Piloting | 2 | April 27th 04 11:35 PM |