![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article pan.2008.06.08.14.02.43.820278
@meower.flonker.kookologist.sf-fan.callahanian, TransWench says... I was busily flonking away in talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, rec.crafts.metalworking, misc.survivalism, and alt.usenet.kooks, when The Goddess Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to ZeD: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:44:09 -0700, Max Isn't Well wrote: Aratzio says... On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:03:51 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, "RD (The Sandman)" got double secret probation for writing: Aratzio wrote: biggus snippus I don't think there is a right to own an assault weapon. I don't think you know what an assault weapon is. It is a media term used to describe *semi* auto military look alikes. They fire a medium powered round one shot at a time just like a revolver. Now, if you wish to use the term "assault rifle" that is an actual term that describes *full* auto capable weaponry like what is actually used by the military. Full auto weaponry has been controlled by federal law since 1934. Ownership of full auto is banned in some states. The media also uses this term incorrectly in describing what are assault "weapons". Specific types of military grade weapons should be tightly controlled. They are.....like since 1934. And demonstrates that controlling specific types of weapons is legal. 'Legal' but unconstitutional. The second amendment does NOT specify semi-automatic arms or even small arms. The purpose of the second amendment being to provide the citizenry with protection from the government, I an entitled to any weapon they have. That's a fact. The anti gun nuts must think they have nothing to fear from their government. I'm still waiting for you gun nuts to actually *do something* about the foaming-at-the-mouth government you now have...At the rate you're "mobilising", I figure you should be ready to move a week or two after Way Too ****ing Late. Why in the world would they do that? The way the situation sits at the moment, they get to look downright moderate by comparison. -- "Tis an ill wind that blows no minds" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hail Eris! On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:58:42 -0700, Eris Kallisti Discordia was
laughing at the antics of Max Isn't Well, when they suddenly burst out in tears: TransWench says... I was busily flonking away in talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, rec.crafts.metalworking, misc.survivalism, and alt.usenet.kooks, when The Goddess Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to ZeD: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:44:09 -0700, Max Isn't Well wrote: Aratzio says... On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:03:51 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, "RD (The Sandman)" got double secret probation for writing: Aratzio wrote: biggus snippus I don't think there is a right to own an assault weapon. I don't think you know what an assault weapon is. It is a media term used to describe *semi* auto military look alikes. They fire a medium powered round one shot at a time just like a revolver. Now, if you wish to use the term "assault rifle" that is an actual term that describes *full* auto capable weaponry like what is actually used by the military. Full auto weaponry has been controlled by federal law since 1934. Ownership of full auto is banned in some states. The media also uses this term incorrectly in describing what are assault "weapons". Specific types of military grade weapons should be tightly controlled. They are.....like since 1934. And demonstrates that controlling specific types of weapons is legal. 'Legal' but unconstitutional. The second amendment does NOT specify semi-automatic arms or even small arms. The purpose of the second amendment being to provide the citizenry with protection from the government, I an entitled to any weapon they have. That's a fact. The anti gun nuts must think they have nothing to fear from their government. I'm still waiting for you gun nuts to actually *do something* about the foaming-at-the-mouth government you now have...At the rate you're "mobilising", I figure you should be ready to move a week or two after Way Too ****ing Late. Why in the world would they do that? The way the situation sits at the moment, they get to look downright moderate by comparison. Well, the ones who're still totally co-opted by BushCo, I wouldn't see getting in on that action, no, but not all of them _are_, going by what some of them have said. But it appears even the moderate pro-gun advocates would rather play politics with those they see as opposing them, rather than making so much as an attempt to go after the ones who're turning the US into one big corporation. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ PorscheMonkey4Life COOSN-029-06-71069; Lits Slut #16 Butcher Knife Natalia; Gutter Chix0r #17; AUK Psycho & Felon #21 BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4; Parrot & Zombie #2 Usenet Ruiner #5; Top Asshole #3; Official Chung Demon Official Chung Demon; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13 Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18 No holy posting of any kind, to email. "It can't rain all the time" "Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." -- John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID: http://www.runescape.com/ Join my RuneScape clan! http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel Xander: "I still don't get why we had to come here to get info about a killer snot monster." Giles: "Because it's a killer snot monster from outer space. (pause) I did not say that." -- "Listening to Fear" (87/509), Buffy the Vampire Slayer "Actually, I quit. Nobody takes my frock." -- Captain Jack, "The Doctor Dances" (27.10), Doctor Who Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/ The MonkeyLJ: http://porchmonkey.livejournal.com/ -- nuked! 8. OK, so who's this "Dev McKinHole", then? I dunno, some guy named Devon McKinnon of Dawson Creek, allegedly, and according to the Monkey, a pedophile. However, I wouldn't take that too seriously. The Monkey keeps changing his mind about who I am, so there's no reason to think he won't change it about Mr. McKinnon, too. "I am mentally stable, fool...I am going to be a bishop's wife." -- Sure you are, Olympiada. MID: "yes you are definitely retarded. See a neurologist immediate. And if you don't have monet, blow a neurologist immediately." -- Farky the Monkey-man to peachy ashie passion. No, no trace of irony in his post. MID: 4h6xh.802$hH2.233@trnddc02 "I was told there would be cookies." Cross-Poasters For Goddess! Remember: Straight people can't help it! A petition to make the Five-Fingered Hand of Eris the official symbol for the planet Eris: http://www.petitiononline.com/ffhoeris/ "If you don't have pedicures AT LEAST every two weeks, don't talk to me. If you don't floss every night and morning and brush at least twice a day, don't talk to me. If you don't spend money on you hair and get great cuts and color, don't talk to me. If you are heavy, don't talk to me. If you don't shower every morning and take a nice bubble bath every night, don't talk to me. If you don't have a loved one in your arms, don't talk to me. If you don't keep an immaculate house, don't talk to me. If you don't work, don't talk to me." -- Clearly, Martha Vandella never wants to talk to me, which is for the best, really. MID: . com "You're fighting a Furry Giant "He delivers a long speech about how you shouldn't judge him just because he's an animal deep down inside and you're all intolerant and dressing up like an animal in easy-access furry pants doesn't make you a pervert... you fall asleep halfway through." -- The Kingdom of Loathing To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a stalker. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1st AMENDMENT PROTECTS TROLLS FROM BEING TOSed FROM ISP, SUPREME COURT RULES | Bertie the Bunyip[_24_] | Piloting | 8 | February 16th 08 04:32 PM |
Departure procedures notice | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 4 | January 25th 07 10:21 PM |
FAA safety notice on ground ops/TO | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 8 | September 7th 06 02:18 AM |
China has taken notice it would seem | Mike Keown | Military Aviation | 8 | August 29th 03 07:09 PM |
China has taken notice it would seem | Mike Keown | Naval Aviation | 5 | August 29th 03 05:13 PM |