Whose War? Patrick J. Buchanan - The American Conservative

http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html
March 24, 2003 issue
The American Conservative

Whose War?

A neoconservative clique seeks to
ensnare our country in a series of
wars that are not in America's interest.

by Patrick J. Buchanan

"torresD" wrote in news:vvxkc.625$Hs1.308
@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

A neoconservative clique seeks to
snip
by Patrick J. Buchanan

There is nothing more ludicrous than Pat trying to distance
himself from neocons. Pat is the prototypical neocon, and
always has been. Big government, intrusive government Pat.

Then again, the Indianapolis LP ran Greg Dixon. Go figure.


--
"It's obvious to me that this country is rapidly dividing itself into
two camps - the wimps and the warriors. The ones who want to argue
and assess and appease, and the ones who want to carry this fight to
our enemies and kill them before they kill us."
--The Hon. Zell Miller

"Asmodeus" wrote in message
6.16...
....
--
"It's obvious to me that this country is rapidly dividing itself into
two camps - the wimps and the warriors. The ones who want to argue
and assess and appease, and the ones who want to carry this fight to
our enemies and kill them before they kill us."
--The Hon. Zell Miller

If Zell had been running things in 1962 he would have rolled over for the
joint chiefs and we would have had a nice little nuclear war. Kennedy
argued.

SG

If Zell had been running things in 1962 he would have rolled over for the
joint chiefs and we would have had a nice little nuclear war. Kennedy
argued.

Kennedy is often --usually-- seen as this playboy cheater, but he faced down
old Iron Pants himself -- Curtis Lemay -- and the other generals who had
convinced themselves that a nuclear exchange with the USSR was a good thing.

Walt

Asmodeus wrote:
"torresD" wrote in news:vvxkc.625$Hs1.308
@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

A neoconservative clique seeks to

snip

by Patrick J. Buchanan

There is nothing more ludicrous than Pat trying to distance
himself from neocons. Pat is the prototypical neocon, and
always has been. Big government, intrusive government Pat.

Which planet have you been on for the past few years? Uranus?

Buchanan is absolutely right -- Israel hijacked our foreign policy
the old-fashioned way: they bought it fair and square. Bribery works.
And now, we are fighting a war for the benefit of Israel.

It's time to try Richard Perle for treason.

"Ken Smith" wrote in message ...
Asmodeus wrote:
"torresD" wrote in news:vvxkc.625$Hs1.308
@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

A neoconservative clique seeks to

snip

by Patrick J. Buchanan

There is nothing more ludicrous than Pat trying to distance
himself from neocons. Pat is the prototypical neocon, and
always has been. Big government, intrusive government Pat.

Which planet have you been on for the past few years? Uranus?

Buchanan is absolutely right -- Israel hijacked our foreign policy
the old-fashioned way: they bought it fair and square. Bribery works.
And now, we are fighting a war for the benefit of Israel.


Yeah, sure.

-*MORT*-

Morton Davis wrote:
"Ken Smith" wrote in message ...
Asmodeus wrote:
"torresD" wrote in news:vvxkc.625$Hs1.308
:

A neoconservative clique seeks to

snip

by Patrick J. Buchanan

There is nothing more ludicrous than Pat trying to distance
himself from neocons. Pat is the prototypical neocon, and
always has been. Big government, intrusive government Pat.

Which planet have you been on for the past few years? Uranus?

Buchanan is absolutely right -- Israel hijacked our foreign policy
the old-fashioned way: they bought it fair and square. Bribery works.
And now, we are fighting a war for the benefit of Israel.

Yeah, sure.

So tell me, why *ARE* we fighting this war? Because Dubya is a sick
religious nutter who hears voices (like our Teddi)? It *sure* as hell
ain't the WMD (none left, as Ritter predicted) or the links to al-Qaeda
(couldn't find those, either). Powell was right.

"Ken Smith" wrote
So tell me, why *ARE* we fighting this war?

Because Islam has come for us and we've got it to do with them.
Saddam got to ride the pipe because he was a secular muslim and nobody would
get ****ed from a religious standpoint. Iraq and Afghanistan provide good
platforms for confronting Islam on their own ground- better to fight there
than here.

Chas

"Ken Smith" wrote in message ...
....

Buchanan is absolutely right -- Israel hijacked our foreign policy
the old-fashioned way: they bought it fair and square. Bribery works.
And now, we are fighting a war for the benefit of Israel.

It's time to try Richard Perle for treason.

Wait a minute, I thought the war was fought to prop up the Saudi regime and
their extreme sect of Islam, Wahhibism. At any rate the usg does support
them, I doubt Israel likes that very much.

SG

Ken Smith wrote in :

Which planet have you been on for the past few years? Uranus?

No, that would be the location of your head.

--
"It's obvious to me that this country is rapidly dividing itself into
two camps - the wimps and the warriors. The ones who want to argue
and assess and appease, and the ones who want to carry this fight to
our enemies and kill them before they kill us."
--The Hon. Zell Miller