![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Greetings from the Great snowed in North.... I called Titebond and asked about mech properties of TB3 glue and heard something I didn't like. I ewas told it wsnt approved for structural applications because it creeped over time.. Now exactly what that relationship is is is not too clearly defined. It seems that the glue will exhibit creep under constant loads over time. This means you dont want to do glue lams for house parts, but it is unclear if this applies to airplanes. They dont see stress except when carrying flight loads, and the question of duration meeting the meaning of the term "over time" isnt defined. I'd build ribs right now with it, but I might use epoxy on the spars...... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ With that message from the Great Snowed-in North, you should be aware that Leonard Mulholland has used Titebond-III on his Legal Eagle and Double Eagle wings, which are the only wooden parts. (The other parts are steel tubing and were assembled using smoke & flames!) To creep or not to creep, that is the question. But knowing how much weight was involved in the creep test would be a good place to start. As I recall, the FPL used something like 200 psi and 80F degrees for their standard creep test. Leonard's wing has surely seen the 80F factor a time or two but even the springiest leading edge ply is only a few pounds, far, FAR away from the factor used by the FPL. So I THINK Titebond-III is okay... that their definition of 'creep' will not be a factor in my usage of the adhesive. The tests I have run -- an some continuing even now -- were started in March of 2007. (It is now Dec of 2008) Of those completed (ie, tested to destruction) there was no evidence of creep at the time the ribs were destroyed. Of those left hanging... I'll have to take them down in order to use the space... one is supporting a weight of about 200 pounds, the other has the same weight but the rib is oriented differently. Neither shows any evidence of creep but then, neither has been subjected to CONSTANTLY high temperatures; only the ambient temps here at the shop, which have ranged from the 50's to the 80's with an occasional excursion higher or lower. No creep there, either. -Bob Hoover |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 18, 2:22*pm, " wrote:
wrote: * * Greetings from the Great snowed in North.... * * * I called Titebond and asked about mech properties * * of TB3 glue and heard something I didn't like. *I ewas told it wsnt approved for * * structural applications because it creeped over time.. *Now exactly what that relationship is * * is is not too clearly defined. *It seems that the glue will exhibit creep under constant loads * * over time. *This means you dont want to do glue lams for house parts, but it is unclear * * if this applies to airplanes. *They dont see stress except when carrying flight loads, and * * the question of duration meeting the meaning of the term "over time" isnt defined. * * I'd build ribs right now with it, but I might use epoxy on the spars...... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--------------------------------------------- With that message from the Great Snowed-in North, you should be aware that Leonard Mulholland has used Titebond-III on his Legal Eagle and Double Eagle wings, which are the only wooden parts. *(The other parts are steel tubing and were assembled using smoke & flames!) To creep or not to creep, that is the question. *But knowing how much weight was involved in the creep test would be a good place to start. As I recall, the FPL used something like 200 psi and 80F degrees for their standard creep test. *Leonard's wing has surely seen the 80F factor a time or two but even the springiest leading edge ply is only a few pounds, far, FAR away from the factor used by the FPL. So I THINK Titebond-III is okay... that their definition of 'creep' will not be a factor in my usage of the adhesive. *The tests I have run -- an some continuing even now -- were started in March of 2007. (It is now Dec of 2008) *Of those completed (ie, tested to destruction) there was no evidence of creep at the time the ribs were destroyed. *Of those left hanging... I'll have to take them down in order to use the space... one is supporting a weight of about 200 pounds, the other has the same weight but the rib is oriented differently. *Neither shows any evidence of creep but then, neither has been subjected to CONSTANTLY high temperatures; only the ambient temps here at the shop, which have ranged from the 50's to the 80's with an occasional excursion higher or lower. *No creep there, either. -Bob Hoover Good information to know about TB3, thanks' Bob, I've already tried some TB3 on some test part's to see it's level of adheasion. Strong stuff at a nice price, which is a big plus for me. Joe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tube wing spars | [email protected] | Home Built | 10 | March 20th 08 06:44 PM |
Woodstock spars | MartyH | Soaring | 11 | June 22nd 07 03:13 AM |
Titanium spars and composites on F-22 | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 1 | December 4th 03 03:21 PM |
Props? | Toks Desalu | Home Built | 2 | November 13th 03 09:39 AM |
S-H Spars: Anyone check for voids laterally? | Mark Grubb | Soaring | 1 | September 20th 03 04:27 AM |