![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pilots all:
The US rules have for several years had the option of "drop your worst day" scoring. So far noone has used it, but I for one would like to give it a try. Most of all, I think pilots will like it a lot. Yes, in the end somebody has to win, but that horrible feeling of “now I’m screwed I might as well go home” after a landout or a bad day will vanish, making the contest a lot more fun. I think it can help safety. I think pilots would more quickly give up on awful days, choosing to take their “drop day” rather than press on causing the usual landout damage we see on weak days. I think it would also help pilots to make that hard decision to abandon the task in thunderstorms or clearly dangerous weather. There is a bit of a counterargument. Perhpas pilots will strike out and fly more aggressively knowing they can drop a landout. This might get worse on the last day, and pilots might feel the need to do more math and strategizing. I don't think this is true, but that's why we need to try it in regionals. I also our team selection also puts too much emphasis on avoiding one bad day, and thus too much emphasis on flying lots of contests in lots of different classes. Moving this to nationals and team selection will take years of course, but if everyone thinks it's great that could happen eventually. The rule is rather carefully crafted. If you just “drop your worst score” you might end up dropping the day you won, if it was devalued to 500 points. Instead you “get the winner’s score” on whichever day that helps you the most. And it phases in, as it should for short contests. The actual text is below. I'm talking to one CD about trying this at a regional this year, and will talk to more as the schedule gets finalized. Certainly, a groundswell from pilots of "hey, could we try the drop a day (or more accurately, worst day adjustement) at this contest?" would give us more chances to try it. So, I'm posting this in the hope that lots of pilots will talk to the CDs of contests they plan to go to and encourage them to give it a try, or that CDs will see the post directly and get the bug. In all fairness, the decision to use this should be made early and well publicized. John Cochrane BB 11.4.4 † Worst Day Score Adjustment If this is declared to be in effect, an adjustment is calculated and added to the cumulative score of each entrant. 11.4.4.1 † Worst Day Score Differential For each entrant, WDSD is the greatest difference on any contest day between the entrant's score (before application of a Contest penalty) and the highest score achieved by any regular entrant in the class on that day. 11.4.4.2 † A Worst Day Score Adjustment is added to each entrant's cumulative score, as follows: After one official day: WDSA = zero After 2 official days: WDSA = 0.25 * WDSD After 3 official days: WDSA = 0.5 * WDSD After 4 official days: WDSA = 0.75 * WDSD After 5 or more official days: WDSA = WDSD |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 21, 7:52*am, wrote:
Pilots all: The US rules have for several years had the option of "drop your worst day" scoring. So far noone has used it, but I for one would like to give it a try. This is an interesting concept. In our club contest series we have, for many years, scored best half days plus one. So in a series with 10 contest days everyone is scored on their best 6 days. The idea of dropping bad days has been popular. This rule seems a bit harder to get to grips with, and I'm wonder what the surprise scenarios are. For example what if a few pilots close to the bottom of the cumulative score sheet get home one day and every one else lands out. It seems that could make this day everyone elses drop day but perhaps a different drop day would be more favorable in terms of closing a gap on the cumulative winner. Do you have any examples of past contests that are scored with and without this rule? If so, do they always show that the automatically selected drop is the most favorable for each pilot? Andy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Do you have any examples of past contests that are scored with and without this rule? *If so, do they always show that the automatically selected drop is the most favorable for each pilot? By definition, yes, the automatically selected drop is the one that raises your score the most. I haven't rescored any old contests -- that would be fun and I'd be interested in seeing the results. But of course that won't answer the question, how will people's tactics and enjoyment of the contest differ if we try the new rule. John |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like this rule and I hope the CD uses it at R9 Parowan this year. I
doubt it will have any impact on final results (all pilots will benefit), but I do believe it will have some impact on the decision making process (read: safety). 2NO |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hang the ******* and anyone who utters this crap. All of you who want
this should start your own organization and hold hands as you start. Perhaps we should have a 7th class, the crying class. This is a tough sport and it's the tough that makes it great. It is how the Great claw above us all. I want to see the Great , even if it takes them years to get there. It must be frozen solid in Chicago, for the blood hath stop flowing above the neck. R |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 21, 1:55*pm, " wrote:
Hang the ******* and anyone who utters this crap. All of you who want this should start your own organization and hold hands as you start. Perhaps we should have a 7th class, the crying class. This is a tough sport and it's the tough that makes it great. It is how the Great claw above us all. I want to see the Great , even if it takes them years to get there. It must be frozen solid in Chicago, for the blood hath stop flowing above the neck. R Henry Stop holding back and say what you think. Hold it in long enough, you will explode. UH |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought I was quite eloquent. A bit Shakespearean with a touch
Southern charm. R |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not so sure about this.
It takes us one more step away from the way the rest of the world runs competitions. Is this a good idea, given that one of the principal purposes of the national contest hierarchy is to prepare pilots for the US Team? Alternatively, we could adopt the international rules, which don't penalize bad days quite as severely (the WGC01 winner in Standard Class landed out on Day 4). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 21, 9:52*am, wrote:
Pilots all: The US rules have for several years had the option of "drop your worst day" scoring. So far noone has used it, but I for one would like to give it a try. Most of all, I think pilots will like it a lot. Yes, in the end somebody has to win, but that horrible feeling of “now I’m screwed I might as well go home” after a landout or a bad day will vanish, making the contest a lot more fun. I think it can help safety. I think pilots would more quickly give up on awful days, choosing to take their “drop day” rather than press on causing the usual landout damage we see on weak days. *I think it would also help pilots to make that hard decision to abandon the task in thunderstorms or clearly dangerous weather. There is a bit of a counterargument. Perhpas pilots will strike out and fly more aggressively knowing they can drop a landout. This might get worse on the last day, and pilots might feel the need to do more math and strategizing. I don't think this is true, but that's why we need to try it in regionals. I also our team selection also puts too much emphasis on avoiding one bad day, and thus too much emphasis on flying lots of contests in lots of different classes. Moving this to nationals and team selection will take years of course, but if everyone thinks it's great that could happen eventually. The rule is rather carefully crafted. If you just “drop your worst score” you might end up dropping the day you won, if it was devalued to 500 points. *Instead you “get the winner’s score” on whichever day that helps you the most. And it phases in, as it should for short contests. The actual text is below. I'm talking to one CD about trying this at a regional this year, and will talk to more as the schedule gets finalized. *Certainly, a groundswell from pilots of "hey, could we try the drop a day (or more accurately, worst day adjustement) at this contest?" would give us more chances to try it. So, I'm posting this in the hope that lots of pilots will talk to the CDs of contests they plan to go to and encourage them to give it a try, or that CDs will see the post directly and get the bug. *In all fairness, the decision to use this should be made early and well publicized. John Cochrane BB 11.4.4 † Worst Day Score Adjustment If this is declared to be in effect, an adjustment is calculated and added to the cumulative score of each entrant. 11.4.4.1 † Worst Day Score Differential For each entrant, WDSD is the greatest difference on any contest day between the entrant's score (before application of a Contest penalty) and the highest score achieved by any regular entrant in the class on that day. 11.4.4.2 † A Worst Day Score Adjustment is added to each entrant's cumulative score, as follows: After one official day: WDSA = zero After 2 official days: WDSA = 0.25 * WDSD After 3 official days: WDSA = 0.5 * WDSD After 4 official days: WDSA = 0.75 * WDSD After 5 or more official days: WDSA = WDSD Mulligans, anyone? No, thank you. -T8 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS; ASG29 option | pat | Soaring | 2 | August 31st 06 10:30 PM |
Carrier Tanker Option | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 9 | November 21st 05 02:54 PM |
Where is the 4th option? | JohnH | Piloting | 0 | May 13th 05 05:07 PM |
DG goes the sustainer option. | Paul | Soaring | 25 | June 4th 04 12:16 AM |
Lease with option to buy | Jim Burns | Owning | 1 | May 3rd 04 02:16 PM |