![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike
wrote: ....By 1997 officials had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11, 2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States. Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful. What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money? What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears and long range escorts? Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's happened before. At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia". And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough. TL |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 1, 1:16*am, T.L. Davis wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike wrote: ...By 1997 officials had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11, 2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States. Unbelievable, isn't it? *14 aircraft to protect the entire continental United States... *This was what NORAD was reduced to?? *Pitiful. What was the defense budget in 2001?? *Who got all the money? What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears and long range escorts? Just incredible. *I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft available on 9/11. *I overestimated. *This is what happens when a country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's happened before. At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia". And the best is too good for America. *F-35s are good enough. TL I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able to handle them. You don't? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Linthicum wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike wrote: ...By 1997 officials had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11, 2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States. Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful. What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money? What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears and long range escorts? Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's happened before. At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia". And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough. TL I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able to handle them. You don't? Yes, there are no more "waves" of Bears. And the number of Blackjacks is almost insignificant. There is no plausible reason for Russia to use those planes in such fashion. I am curious as to what a "ong range escort" would be. Dean |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
damarkley wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote: On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike wrote: ...By 1997 officials had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11, 2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States. Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful. What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money? What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears and long range escorts? Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's happened before. At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia". And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough. TL I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able to handle them. You don't? Yes, there are no more "waves" of Bears. And the number of Blackjacks is almost insignificant. There is no plausible reason for Russia to use those planes in such fashion. I am curious as to what a "ong range escort" would be. Dean "Long range escort" = call girl along for the ride? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan wrote:
damarkley wrote: Jack Linthicum wrote: On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike wrote: ...By 1997 officials had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11, 2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States. Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful. What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money? What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears and long range escorts? Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's happened before. At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia". And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough. TL I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able to handle them. You don't? Yes, there are no more "waves" of Bears. And the number of Blackjacks is almost insignificant. There is no plausible reason for Russia to use those planes in such fashion. I am curious as to what a "ong range escort" would be. Dean "Long range escort" = call girl along for the ride? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired The Russians do claim to be capitalists, so its possible! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:43:59 -0800 (PST), Jack Linthicum
wrote: On Feb 1, 1:16*am, T.L. Davis wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike wrote: ...By 1997 officials had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11, 2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States. Unbelievable, isn't it? *14 aircraft to protect the entire continental United States... *This was what NORAD was reduced to?? *Pitiful. What was the defense budget in 2001?? *Who got all the money? What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears and long range escorts? Just incredible. *I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft available on 9/11. *I overestimated. *This is what happens when a country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's happened before. At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia". And the best is too good for America. *F-35s are good enough. TL I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able to handle them. You don't? The 14 aircraft do not include those in Alaska and the Canadian Forces aircraft. In other words, they don't include the folks tasked with providing defense against the threat he's ranting about. Peter Skelton |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
... On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:43:59 -0800 (PST), Jack Linthicum wrote: On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike wrote: ...By 1997 officials had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11, 2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States. Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful. What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money? What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears and long range escorts? Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's happened before. At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia". And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough. TL I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able to handle them. You don't? The 14 aircraft do not include those in Alaska and the Canadian Forces aircraft. In other words, they don't include the folks tasked with providing defense against the threat he's ranting about. True, but I think the Canadian aircraft only bring the total to 20, 22 at the most. I am not sure how many QRA are stood to in Alaska at any one time. -- Andrew Chaplin SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:51:56 -0500, "Andrew Chaplin"
wrote: "Peter Skelton" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:43:59 -0800 (PST), Jack Linthicum wrote: On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike wrote: ...By 1997 officials had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11, 2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States. Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful. What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money? What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears and long range escorts? Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's happened before. At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia". And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough. TL I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able to handle them. You don't? The 14 aircraft do not include those in Alaska and the Canadian Forces aircraft. In other words, they don't include the folks tasked with providing defense against the threat he's ranting about. True, but I think the Canadian aircraft only bring the total to 20, 22 at the most. I am not sure how many QRA are stood to in Alaska at any one time. Four at each of two bases on immediate plus eight each that could be available in time less whatever has been siphoned off by Noble Eagle isn't it? Peter Skelton |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Skelton wrote in
: [snip] The 14 aircraft do not include those in Alaska and the Canadian Forces aircraft. In other words, they don't include the folks tasked with providing defense against the threat he's ranting about. I think the al-Qanadian contribution might have amounted to maybe 8 aircraft on a good day. They only have some 4 dozen or so in in service. IBM |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Linthicum wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike wrote: ...By 1997 officials had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11, 2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States. Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful. What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money? What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears and long range escorts? Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's happened before. At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia". And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough. TL I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able to handle them. You don't? Not to mention Russia has nothing to gain using bombers instead of ICBM and SLBM if they wish to start something stupid. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help Us Protect Wickenburg Municipal Airport | Mike[_22_] | Piloting | 0 | September 10th 08 05:39 AM |
Help Us Protect Wickenburg Municipal Airport | [email protected] | Piloting | 1 | September 7th 08 09:46 AM |
Wichita Airspace Question and overlapping airspace | Owen[_4_] | Piloting | 1 | February 14th 07 09:35 PM |
Two airspace classes for one airspace? (KOQU) | John R | Piloting | 8 | June 30th 04 04:46 AM |
String in the middle does not protect you from a spin | Jim | Soaring | 10 | January 30th 04 02:57 PM |