![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have seen phased array aircraft radars that look as if they still
mechanically sweep the dish. I thought the entire reason for phased arrays was so they wouldn't need to mechanically move. I know how phased arrays work in principle, but that's as far as I go. What am I missing here? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Yanik" wrote in message .. . (B2431) wrote in : Uh,I don't believe weather radars are phased arrays. It would be overkill,and an unnecessary expense. http://www.oudaily.com/vnews/display...2?in_archive=1 Keith |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in
: http://www.oudaily.com/vnews/display...ca4e76e2d2?in_ archive=1 This article says that the phased array radar is NEW in this application(weather radar),and was just introduced at a first site. I may have ASSumed that he was referring to weather radar used by TV stations and metrological stations,not airborne civilian aircraft instrumentation. Apologies. -- Jim Yanik jyanik-at-kua.net |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Jim Yanik
(B2431) wrote in : From: (Regnirps) snip Anyway, for these to work well the plane of the array needs to be normal to the target. I'm just amazed the darn things work so well, and when will I be able to get one surplus? -- Charlie Springer Civilian colour weather radar sets show up occasionally on e-bay. As a matter of fact that's what got me to finally break down and ask the question. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Uh,I don't believe weather radars are phased arrays. It would be overkill,and an unnecessary expense. The color part come from computer processing of the radar return -- Jim Yanik jyanik-at-kua.net I could be wrong about its function, but there was a phased array system for civil aircraft on e-bay a week or so ago. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B2431" wrote in message ... I have seen phased array aircraft radars that look as if they still mechanically sweep the dish. I thought the entire reason for phased arrays was so they wouldn't need to mechanically move. I know how phased arrays work in principle, but that's as far as I go. What am I missing here? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Some phased arrays rotate but and are only phase steered in the vertical for height finding purposes. For instance the antenna on US AWACS aircraft use this technique, though the Israeli AWACS use fixed antena inside the dome. This technique goes back to the 2nd world war. (I think the German radars Wassermann and Jagdschloss used it as did the radars for the Soviet missiles SA1 and SA2) Alternatively and cluster of 4 antena as seen on the USN Aegis system can be used. There must be great difficulty in integrating the 4 antena to work together. Having a phased array is pretty important these days. Modern fighter tactics involve splitting in such a way that the enemy can not track the multiple targets with a mechanical antenna anymore and using this as an opportunity to attack. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "The
Enlightenment" wrote: Some phased arrays rotate but and are only phase steered in the vertical for height finding purposes. For instance the antenna on US AWACS aircraft use this technique, though the Israeli AWACS use fixed antena inside the dome. This technique goes back to the 2nd world war. (I think the German radars Wassermann and Jagdschloss used it as did the radars for the Soviet missiles SA1 and SA2) Alternatively and cluster of 4 antena as seen on the USN Aegis system can be used. There must be great difficulty in integrating the 4 antena to work together. Having a phased array is pretty important these days. Modern fighter tactics involve splitting in such a way that the enemy can not track the multiple targets with a mechanical antenna anymore and using this as an opportunity to attack. As with most things, there are pro's and con's. AESAs let you track more targets effectively instantly, when the nose is pointed in the right direction. But a mechanically scanned array has a larger off-boresite look angle. Above statements for fighter aircraft, not surveillance types. -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[AU] Light plane sparked terror alert | David Bromage | Military Aviation | 41 | September 11th 03 05:37 PM |