![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
be tuned to make 100 HP?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 8:22*am, "oilsardine" wrote:
be tuned to make 100 HP? Probably. But finding a prop to spin at 4500 RPM might be a problem :-) ======================== Leon McAtee |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "oilsardine" wrote in message ... be tuned to make 100 HP? Stick a supercharger on it with fuel injection, and then a bigger oil pump and oil cooler to get rid of the exxtra heat, and no problem. How long it will last is another story. If you set it to not boost too high, it might last a thousand hours. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 2:50*pm, "Morgans" wrote:
How long it will last is another story. *If you set it to not boost too high, it might last a thousand hours. I doubt it. They're an 1800-hour engine that almost always need top overhauls well before then, sometimes before mid-time. Boosting it would overstress already-weak valves and it wouldn't go too far at all. And with the traditionally low oil pressure these things have, the bottom ends wouldn't last too long either. The crank was not nitrided and wears rather rapidly anyway. The same basic engine was boosted to 75 hp (A-75) using a higher redline and heavier piston pins and a slightly larger carb venturi and main jet. They got 80 hp (A-80) by raising the compression to 7.55:1 from 6.5 as well as the higher redline and bigger carb. And that's about as much as they dared get from 140 cubic inches with the engine being as light as it is. Dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hmmm....
thought to replace my Revmaster with this Conti, but now, mybe I better stay with the VDub? schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... On Apr 16, 2:50 pm, "Morgans" wrote: How long it will last is another story. If you set it to not boost too high, it might last a thousand hours. I doubt it. They're an 1800-hour engine that almost always need top overhauls well before then, sometimes before mid-time. Boosting it would overstress already-weak valves and it wouldn't go too far at all. And with the traditionally low oil pressure these things have, the bottom ends wouldn't last too long either. The crank was not nitrided and wears rather rapidly anyway. The same basic engine was boosted to 75 hp (A-75) using a higher redline and heavier piston pins and a slightly larger carb venturi and main jet. They got 80 hp (A-80) by raising the compression to 7.55:1 from 6.5 as well as the higher redline and bigger carb. And that's about as much as they dared get from 140 cubic inches with the engine being as light as it is. Dan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 3:13*am, "oilsardine" wrote:
hmmm.... thought to replace my Revmaster with this Conti, but now, mybe I better stay with the VDub? Now you have me confused. If you are thinking that you need to up the hp of the Cont to match the performance of the Revmaster you've been drinking someones Kool-aid....................by the pool full :-) Seriously, more info would help. What is you goal? What kind of plane? If your plane can handle the extra weight, required prop length and the C 65 is a good buy you might be better off with the C 65. If your flying something like a KR originally designed around a VW your probably going to be better off letting the C 65 rest. Is your Reve giving you problems or less than expected performance? There are other options to consider. Subaru n 'Vair pop to mind. ============== Leon McAtee |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... ..... Seriously, more info would help. What is you goal? What kind of plane? I have a Revmaster (normal aspirated) in an slightly :-) overweight Sonex. The plane hasn't flown yet. Some extra HP could help. The Conti would fit weight-wise, but seems also underpowered for this application. The Conti turns slower than the Revmaster, but my prop diameter is limited by ground clearance... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 5:54*pm, wrote: question about
a-65-8. The 80-hp version is cranky because the pistons are so heavy. And there's an AD on the wrist pins because they break, and the rods will break too. The only way to go 80 is with bootleg pistons and a few other mods. There's a Cub in SC with Chevy pistons. It makes more power than a C-85 Cub, or at least climbs out faster. You can't get a Cub to cruise faster because it is so aerodynamically dirty. Stay with an A-65-8. It is great reliable power and will last a long time if you fly it regularly. Jugs will last a max of 500-700 hours. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Continental 757 18R @ MCO | Glen in Orlando | Aviation Photos | 4 | November 30th 06 03:15 AM |
Continental O-200 ? | Stealth Pilot | Home Built | 48 | September 23rd 06 06:32 PM |
continental 4 banger | Philippe Vessaire | Home Built | 2 | May 19th 06 04:27 AM |
Continental 0-200 | Robert | Home Built | 0 | August 31st 05 11:57 AM |
Continental 0-200 | Robert | Home Built | 0 | April 3rd 04 03:08 AM |