![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 11, 7:51 am, Jeb in Richmond wrote:
On May 10, 7:55 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote: On May 10, 3:42 pm, "Paul J. Adam" wrote: Ken S. Tucker wrote: On May 10, 12:23 pm, "Keith Willshaw" wrote: standards) to search, select, aim and fire. And be shot down by a Standard 2 missile - oops Maybe 80% of the time, but you forget PROBABILTY. I'm well acquainted with PROBABILITY. This is why you do "shoot-look-shoot" - and suddenly your threatening track now only has a 4% chance of surviving. (And this assumes that you only have time for one follow up) Note that any soft-kill countermeasures still get to play with the surviving threat seekers Hmm, I was generous enabling the 80%. Paul you pushed to 96%... You (Paul & Keith) are pushin' our BS detector off scale!!! Have either of you ever designed and fired a missile? Who do you mean by "our"? What they're saying is perfectly valid, and probably even understating the actual use. Operationally, I would expect a USN carrier group's guided missile ships to loft multiples EACH if an inbound ballistic was detected. What does the Pk for a half- dozen SM-3 guiding on a target that's mid-apex and not maneuvering look like? And assuming that nothing even gets a mission kill on the target, you're still tracking it and the battle group's got dozens more SM-3 in the cells ready to go. Russia can do it easily, and here's China... http://www.janes.com/defence/naval_f...0118_1_n.shtml I'm afraid that looking ahead 1 decade, our CVN's could be vulnerable. One cheap IRBM can carry 10 (in the 3rd stage) cheap guided missiles inbound, steering subsonically even using only gravity for thrust. 1st stage, solid, cheap, coarse fin guidance. 2nd stage, solid, cheap, minor gimbal guidance. we're now in space, ballistic, sub-orbital. 3rd stage, solid, advanced refined guidance, final course set, 10 missiles separate. Re-entry, each missile deploys speed-brakes using atmosphere on inertial guidance, for initial targeting. At 80k, subsonic, speed brakes in conjuction with gliding fins (smart bomb style) adjust course to image of locked on target, velocity ~ 1000'/sec. At 60k, 1 minute to target, image refinement improving, course corrections occuring. At 10k, selection of strike location on selected target is locked in. Last Fail-Safe is Go. At Ok, penetration at assigned vulnerable location with 100# of ordinance, velocity 900'/sec. 0+2 seconds, the Control Tower and Bridge are decommisioned, by 2 inbounds. Other targeted areas are the reactors, fuel, ammo and the head. Sorry I adopted a sort of drama style of writing, but I think it's reasonable to try to understand the risks to our navy. Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"PENTAGON WORKING TO GIVE F-35 JSF NUCLEAR-STRIKE CAPABILITY" | Mike | Naval Aviation | 126 | May 28th 09 01:18 PM |
"Pentagon Wants Kill Switch for Planes" | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 24 | June 16th 08 03:27 PM |
Spinner strobing as a "Bird Strike Countermeasure" | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 259 | December 13th 07 05:43 AM |
"British trace missile in copter strike to Iran" | Mike[_7_] | Naval Aviation | 8 | March 10th 07 08:20 PM |
"Pentagon Command Shuffle Rekindles Equity Debate" | Mike | Naval Aviation | 1 | January 26th 07 03:04 PM |