![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Off & on over the years since turbo prop cropdusters (more politely,
ag-aircraft) have been being converted from radial engines to PT-6 or Garret power, I've wondered if anyone has converted an AT-6/SNJ to a turbo prop. Surely some well-to-do (or just eccentric) type has at least considered it. Anyone ever hear of or see one? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no, since how do you improve on perfection ?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, let's see. A turbine has been hung on the P-51D & someone
figured a Cessna 182 needed a non-fuel injected *******ized IO-520 hung on it. Beech 18s & DC-3s have been getting it done for years. I didn't say anything about 'improving perfection'. I do understand the improved reliability & other benefits of a turbine, tho. IIRC, Taiwan had a turbo prop trainer that's essentially a T-28 with a Lycoming T-55 turbo prop on it. iespam (N329DF) wrote in message ... no, since how do you improve on perfection ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, let's see. A turbine has been hung on the P-51D
None of these are flying today........why? VL |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope, no Turbo Mustangs, but quite a few DC-3s & Beech 18s with
turbines are, IIRC. I guess no Turbo Mustangs are around since the military never pursued them. Which brings up another point. That new-fangled homebuilt composite Mustang look-a-like with a Lycoming T-55 (I think). That's almost expensive as buying a real P-51, isn't it? (MLenoch) wrote in message ... Well, let's see. A turbine has been hung on the P-51D None of these are flying today........why? VL |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
in 1968 there was a turbine powered P-51 called the Cavalier Turbo Mustang
III http://cavaliermustang.tripod.com/intro.html (scroll down the page to read about it). It was later marketed as the Piper Enforcer http://cavaliermustang.tripod.com/enforcer.html -- Les Matheson F-4C(WW)/D/E/G(WW), AC-130A, MC-130E WSO/EWO (ret) "frank may" wrote in message om... Nope, no Turbo Mustangs, but quite a few DC-3s & Beech 18s with turbines are, IIRC. I guess no Turbo Mustangs are around since the military never pursued them. Which brings up another point. That new-fangled homebuilt composite Mustang look-a-like with a Lycoming T-55 (I think). That's almost expensive as buying a real P-51, isn't it? (MLenoch) wrote in message ... Well, let's see. A turbine has been hung on the P-51D None of these are flying today........why? VL --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/19/2004 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
USN still uses the Beech Mentor, powered by turbine in T-34C configuration.
frank may wrote: Well, let's see. A turbine has been hung on the P-51D & someone figured a Cessna 182 needed a non-fuel injected *******ized IO-520 hung on it. Beech 18s & DC-3s have been getting it done for years. I didn't say anything about 'improving perfection'. I do understand the improved reliability & other benefits of a turbine, tho. IIRC, Taiwan had a turbo prop trainer that's essentially a T-28 with a Lycoming T-55 turbo prop on it. iespam (N329DF) wrote in message ... no, since how do you improve on perfection ? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "frank may" wrote in message om... Off & on over the years since turbo prop cropdusters (more politely, ag-aircraft) have been being converted from radial engines to PT-6 or Garret power, I've wondered if anyone has converted an AT-6/SNJ to a turbo prop. Surely some well-to-do (or just eccentric) type has at least considered it. Anyone ever hear of or see one? Hmmm. How many ag aircraft were *converted* to turbo power after aleady being built as recip powered aircraft? I know that some of them have undergone second production lives as turbo-powered aircraft, but has there been any actual conversion of aircraf that were already flying? Brooks |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've wondered if anyone has converted an AT-6/SNJ to a
turbo prop. Why would anyone do that? That snorting radial engine is half the fun of the airplane. VL |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd imagine that about 1/2 or so turbine ag planes have been
converted, maybe more. At least the ones I know of. Most of the turbine AgCats I see have been converted. About 1/2 of the turbine Air Tractors I see have been converted. OTOH, most of the turbine Thrushes that I see are factory built, but they were doing that in the late '70s. It's a lot cheaper to do a conversion to an airframe than to go buy a new one. "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... "frank may" wrote in message om... Off & on over the years since turbo prop cropdusters (more politely, ag-aircraft) have been being converted from radial engines to PT-6 or Garret power, I've wondered if anyone has converted an AT-6/SNJ to a turbo prop. Surely some well-to-do (or just eccentric) type has at least considered it. Anyone ever hear of or see one? Hmmm. How many ag aircraft were *converted* to turbo power after aleady being built as recip powered aircraft? I know that some of them have undergone second production lives as turbo-powered aircraft, but has there been any actual conversion of aircraf that were already flying? Brooks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? | Gus Rasch | Aerobatics | 1 | February 14th 08 10:18 PM |
Ivo Prop on O-320 | Dave S | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 04 03:04 AM |
Prop Pitch Question | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 2 | April 25th 04 03:22 AM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |
Metal Prop vs. Wood Prop | Larry Smith | Home Built | 21 | September 26th 03 07:45 PM |