![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
I am training for my PPL in the UK at Liverpool John Lennon Airport, I have passed the 55 hour mark which includes my Qualifying X-Country. Not long to go now.... anyway, back to the subject of my posting. ![]() At Liverpool, we do our power checks on the GA Apron and not at the holding point, after the power checks we check the ATIS then request taxi. I have been taught by my instructor(s) to make the call something like this: G-ABCD: Liverpool Tower, this is G-ABCD at Kilo with information Alpha QNH 1234, QFE 1234 request Taxi To which the tower will reply confirming the AN/QFE and give taxi instructions. However, When re-entering the Liverpool zone (or any other FIR), the first call is usually (Station, callsign) i.e. G-ABCD: Liverpool Approach, this is G-ABCD Approach: G-ABCD, Pass your message etc. etc. etc. I was told this was to just 'Introduce Yourself' first to ensure the controller is ready to accept your message, My question is: Why not do the same when on the Apron? i.e. G-ABCD: Liverpool Tower, this is G-ABCD Tower: G-ABCD, Pass your message G-ABCD: G-ABCD is at Kilo with information Alpha AN 1234, QFE 1234 request Taxi Surely it would be better to 'just introduce' yourself to the Tower before babbling for 10 seconds only to be told by the Tower to 'Stand By' as he is about to vector a 737 in for an approach. I hate it (especially earlier in my training) when I would make a rushed tongue tied call to the Tower only to be either told to Stand By or realise I was talking over someone else. Any comments or advice? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "karel adams" wrote in message ... "Paul" schreef in bericht ... Hi I am training for my PPL in the UK at Liverpool John Lennon Airport, I have passed the 55 hour mark which includes my Qualifying X-Country. Not long to go now.... anyway, back to the subject of my posting. ![]() At Liverpool, we do our power checks on the GA Apron and not at the holding point, after the power checks we check the ATIS then request taxi. I have been taught by my instructor(s) to make the call something like this: G-ABCD: Liverpool Tower, this is G-ABCD at Kilo with information Alpha QNH 1234, QFE 1234 request Taxi even stranger than the rest of your story, it seems quite needless to read back both QNH and QFE surely the controller is aware of his (lack of) elevation? KA (continental PPL student) I don't know about Liverpool but at Exeter you have to give then the ATIS information identifier with the QNH on first contact. I suppose it helps confirm that you have understood the ATIS. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul wrote:
Hi I am training for my PPL in the UK at Liverpool John Lennon Airport, I have passed the 55 hour mark which includes my Qualifying X-Country. Not long to go now.... anyway, back to the subject of my posting. ![]() At Liverpool, we do our power checks on the GA Apron and not at the holding point, after the power checks we check the ATIS then request taxi. I have been taught by my instructor(s) to make the call something like this: G-ABCD: Liverpool Tower, this is G-ABCD at Kilo with information Alpha QNH 1234, QFE 1234 request Taxi To which the tower will reply confirming the AN/QFE and give taxi instructions. However, When re-entering the Liverpool zone (or any other FIR), the first call is usually (Station, callsign) i.e. G-ABCD: Liverpool Approach, this is G-ABCD Approach: G-ABCD, Pass your message etc. etc. etc. I was told this was to just 'Introduce Yourself' first to ensure the controller is ready to accept your message, My question is: Why not do the same when on the Apron? i.e. G-ABCD: Liverpool Tower, this is G-ABCD Tower: G-ABCD, Pass your message G-ABCD: G-ABCD is at Kilo with information Alpha AN 1234, QFE 1234 request Taxi Surely it would be better to 'just introduce' yourself to the Tower before babbling for 10 seconds only to be told by the Tower to 'Stand By' as he is about to vector a 737 in for an approach. I hate it (especially earlier in my training) when I would make a rushed tongue tied call to the Tower only to be either told to Stand By or realise I was talking over someone else. Any comments or advice? My first advice is - do what your instructor tells you :-) Seriously, aside from giving you the necessary skills, the instructor is also teaching you how to pass the forthcoming tests, so if that's how it's done, that's how it's done. But you're right - it does seem inconsistent. I've always assumed that the first, brief call to a tower on approaching their airspace was to wake up the controller and give him time to find a pencil. I've lost count of the number of times this has happened: Me: Sleepy Tower, F-GACD. [slight pause] Tower: Ugh ... aircraft calling Sleepy Tower, say again callsign. Of course, I fly in France and most of the towers around here aren't that busy! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As already explained by Jim, the readback of pressure is mandatory, you'll
have a violation filed against you if you dont do ti, similarly all clearances, but thats maybe outside your area of ops, so to speak. When you fisrt call up, LISTEN first. That way you'll get to hear whats going on and you WON'T talk over someone else except by chance. Like Jim I use r/t all day at work (flying) and the occurrences of being "blocked" are rare. If you LISTEN. Also, if you lisrten you can glean a lot of information and so prevent the tower having to repeat. As for being tongue tied, well, just LISTEN first to get your ear in, the if you have to, write down what you re going to say, especially pressures, nd other NUMBERS that often confuse pilots (of all levels). Write down what he tells you so your readback is clear and concise. Trust me, even full time jet jockeys write stuff down...how those ATC guys expect me to remember a speed, a heading, a pressure, a flight level AND a hosties phone number beats me! D |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul" wrote in message
... I am training for my PPL in the UK at Liverpool John Lennon Airport, I have passed the 55 hour mark which includes my Qualifying X-Country. Not long to go now.... anyway, back to the subject of my posting. ![]() I have been taught by my instructor(s) to make the call something like this: G-ABCD: Liverpool Tower, this is G-ABCD at Kilo with information Alpha QNH 1234, QFE 1234 request Taxi ... However, When re-entering the Liverpool zone (or any other FIR), the first call is usually (Station, callsign) i.e. G-ABCD: Liverpool Approach, this is G-ABCD Approach: G-ABCD, Pass your message I find that the easiest way to proceed, regardless of whether you're on the apron or rejoining the, is to listen for a quiet spot and then simply call "Liverpool Tower, G-ABCD" and wait to be asked to pass your message. There's nothing worse (and more pointless) than spouting a load of extra stuff only to find out that you hit the "transmit" button at the same time as someone else, so I find it best to keep it short until you know he's listening to you. Remember, of course, that you should always use your full callsign until the controller uses an abbreviated version, e.g. G-CD; it's not all that often that you come across another G-CD or whatever, and so nine times out of ten you end up abbreviating, but it's a good thing to remember in case, like me, the first time you have to start using the entire callsign is your final skill test! Couple of extra points, though. First, when I've just started up, I do tend to append the words "radio check please" to my first greeting to the tower, just to get an idea of whether the radio's in shape (okay, it's not a brilliant measure, but if I'm sat outside my normal hangar I expect to hear "readability five", and if he says "readability one" it flags a potential issue). At Norwich they're pretty good and they give you the readability even if you don't bother asking, but at some places you need to ask. Secondly, one the controller had acknowledged my existence, I wouldn't bother reading both the QNH and the QFE. Generally the ATIS gives the QNH, and so I'd read that out; if I was staying in the circuit (which he'd know because I told him when I booked out) he would inform me of the current QFE, which I would acknowledge on receipt, and if he didn't tell me then I'd ask him. Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"david" wrote in message
... As already explained by Jim, the readback of pressure is mandatory, you'll have a violation filed against you if you dont do ti, similarly all clearances, but thats maybe outside your area of ops, so to speak. I suspect that it's only in rare cases that you actually get a violation filed, though the option is there for the controller if he or she so wishes. However, particularly when a controller is quite busy, he or she will be annoyed with you, and I've heard some very scathing comments from controllers to people who've not read back the necessary bits. Incidentally, do also try not to read back the stuff you don't have to read back, particularly if you're in a busy area (e.g. Norwich at 11:30 on a summer Saturday), as it does get in the way if every student in the sky is telling the controller what the wind's doing. To continue on the first point, though: do practise your RT, know what you're doing and what your intentions are, and try to sound professional, because it does make a difference to the controller's attitude to you. If you sound uncertain as you call downwind, he'll send you miles away and put you behind the gaggle of stuff on 15-mile final; if you're crisp and you know what your next move is, you often find yourself hearing "Call on finals, number one". I also find being polite works wonders. For instance, even if it's a nice day, I like to try the occasional holding pattern and/or ILS or NDB approach, just in case I need them on a crappy day sometime. I can remember at least one instance when just before I rejoined my local airport, a shirty-sounding instructor in an aircraft a couple of minutes closer to the field than me requested, and was bluntly denied, an ILS approach; I pretended not to have heard, called up for a rejoin, said something like "Good afternoon sir, G-XXXX overhead X, routing X, maintaining two thousand feet; request radar vectors for ILS approach if convenient to yourself", and was immediately granted my vectored approach. D. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Cartwright" wrote in message
... try to sound professional, because it does make a difference to the controller's attitude to you. If you sound uncertain as you call downwind, he'll send you miles away and put you behind the gaggle of stuff on 15-mile final; if you're crisp and you know what your next move is, you often find yourself hearing "Call on finals, number one". I have the opposite problem. At 300 hours and with my own plane, I sound fairly confident over the RT. However if I haven't flown for 2 or 3 weeks, my piloting skills may not be up to making that curved approach to the threshold in a crosswind while doing my checks and then getting off the runway at the first exit to let the next plane land! Paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After 16 years of flying across UK and Europe as a hobby, I completed my
Night Rating on thursday at London Luton. The radio calls you do there are the same as at Luton, with the exception that we have tower and ground frequencies. The power checks are done at the best place for you that does not inconvenience the heavies that pay for the upkeep of the airport. With regard to the radio calls, airports with significant volumes of IFR traffic need a common system, with checks and balances to ensure everyone is singing from the same hymnsheet. Stick with it, it will stand you in good stead. Better to learn at learn that level, than to learn at a grass strip and be frightened of going near a control zone. "Paul" wrote in message ... Hi I am training for my PPL in the UK at Liverpool John Lennon Airport, I have passed the 55 hour mark which includes my Qualifying X-Country. Not long to go now.... anyway, back to the subject of my posting. ![]() At Liverpool, we do our power checks on the GA Apron and not at the holding point, after the power checks we check the ATIS then request taxi. I have been taught by my instructor(s) to make the call something like this: G-ABCD: Liverpool Tower, this is G-ABCD at Kilo with information Alpha QNH 1234, QFE 1234 request Taxi To which the tower will reply confirming the AN/QFE and give taxi instructions. However, When re-entering the Liverpool zone (or any other FIR), the first call is usually (Station, callsign) i.e. G-ABCD: Liverpool Approach, this is G-ABCD Approach: G-ABCD, Pass your message etc. etc. etc. I was told this was to just 'Introduce Yourself' first to ensure the controller is ready to accept your message, My question is: Why not do the same when on the Apron? i.e. G-ABCD: Liverpool Tower, this is G-ABCD Tower: G-ABCD, Pass your message G-ABCD: G-ABCD is at Kilo with information Alpha AN 1234, QFE 1234 request Taxi Surely it would be better to 'just introduce' yourself to the Tower before babbling for 10 seconds only to be told by the Tower to 'Stand By' as he is about to vector a 737 in for an approach. I hate it (especially earlier in my training) when I would make a rushed tongue tied call to the Tower only to be either told to Stand By or realise I was talking over someone else. Any comments or advice? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Better to learn at learn that [Luton] level, than to learn at a grass
strip and be frightened of going near a control zone. Yes, definitely. I learned to fly at Norwich, and actually did about 10 hours out of RAF Coltishall, and so I got to do a lot of R/T that those flying from little rural places wouldn't do. My R/T examiner commented that he can always tell someone who's done their course at a fully-featured, busy airport versus someone who's learned at a dinky place with an oft-silent air-ground station and has no actual experience of (say) calling a military guy for a MATZ crossing, or having a radar advisory service, or whatever. D. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly my point. I used to own a Warrior and flew virtually every week. I
just restarted after a three year layoff, although I flew with a friend sometimes from Stapleford. My instructor at Luton said he could always tell if someone had learned their R/T at a grass strip or a controlled airfield. I learnt at Southend in the days when it had a control zone. If you learnt at Norwich, you might have been to Earls Colne (EGSR). That's where my plane was (and still is) based. Did a lot of flying around E.Anglia John "David Cartwright" wrote in message ... Better to learn at learn that [Luton] level, than to learn at a grass strip and be frightened of going near a control zone. Yes, definitely. I learned to fly at Norwich, and actually did about 10 hours out of RAF Coltishall, and so I got to do a lot of R/T that those flying from little rural places wouldn't do. My R/T examiner commented that he can always tell someone who's done their course at a fully-featured, busy airport versus someone who's learned at a dinky place with an oft-silent air-ground station and has no actual experience of (say) calling a military guy for a MATZ crossing, or having a radar advisory service, or whatever. D. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(sorta OT) Free Ham Radio Course | RST Engineering | Home Built | 51 | January 24th 05 08:05 PM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
1944 Aerial War Comes to Life in Radio Play | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 25th 04 10:57 PM |
Radio silence, Market Garden and death at Arnhem | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | February 12th 04 12:05 AM |