![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Somehow, in 6 years of flying, I missed the fact that not all light piston
airplanes have oil coolers. Why is this so? What factor determines when an O-320, for instance, must have an oil cooler? ISTR that the oil does a large percentage of the cooling in aircraft piston engines. How does the engine get rid of this heat without an oil cooler? -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"mikem" wrote:
Oil doesn't do "coolling" per se; When an "oil cooler" is added to an engine, it simply increases the total surface area of the engine assembly that the cooling airflow can interact with. These two statements don't quite jibe, do they? The oil cooler removes heat from the engine and the medium that conveys heat to the cooler is oil. I don't see any difference between that and how water cools a water-cooled engine. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 19:19:30 -0500, "Dan Luke"
wrote: "mikem" wrote: Oil doesn't do "coolling" per se; What I tried to convey is that the oil doesnt cool the engine; Oil is used to reduce temperature gradients inside the engine. "Cooling" takes place where the airflow comes in contact with metal... When an "oil cooler" is added to an engine, it simply increases the total surface area of the engine assembly that the cooling airflow can interact with. You started the thread by acting surprised that not all aircraft engines have oil coolers. I tried to point out that aircraft engines have such large external surface areas, that if appropriately cowled, they can get rid of heat without an external oil cooler. Adding an oil cooler has more to do with automatically regulating engine oil temperature for water vapor boil off and constaining sizes of cowling openings for streamlining (ala LoPriesti) than out of pure heat-transfer necessity. The oil cooler removes heat from the engine and the medium that conveys heat to the cooler is oil. I don't see any difference between that and how water cools a water-cooled engine. In those cases where a cooler has been designed in to acheive those other criteria, niether do I, and I said so... MikeM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't underestimate the amount of heat the oil removes from the engine...
It is critical... Without it's help pistons would burn up within minutes, valve springs would overheat, etc...High powered engines often have a an oil spray directed to the bottom of the piston... The oil cooler is needed where the oil pan, case, prop hub, and tappet covers, cannot radiate the heat load adequately... Denny Oil doesn't do "coolling" per se; |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ask a performance boater about a "Drive Shower". Oil cools well there too.
Doesn't make it necessary or even helpful in all cases though. Mikes post makes sense too. Wayne "Dennis O'Connor" wrote in message ... Don't underestimate the amount of heat the oil removes from the engine... It is critical... Without it's help pistons would burn up within minutes, valve springs would overheat, etc...High powered engines often have a an oil spray directed to the bottom of the piston... The oil cooler is needed where the oil pan, case, prop hub, and tappet covers, cannot radiate the heat load adequately... Denny Oil doesn't do "coolling" per se; |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"mikem" wrote:
You started the thread by acting surprised that not all aircraft engines have oil coolers. I tried to point out that aircraft engines have such large external surface areas, that if appropriately cowled, they can get rid of heat without an external oil cooler. Where are you getting this from? I don't mean to sound insulting, but this seems dubious. Appropriately cowled? All the light piston aircraft I am familiar with are cowled the same: a forced air plenum above the cylinders creates a differential pressure across the cylinders and heat is conveyed out of the cowling by the resulting airflow. In some installations, an oil cooler is installed to use this same d. p. for additional cooling. Adding an oil cooler has more to do with automatically regulating engine oil temperature for water vapor boil off... So in hot weather it's not needed? ...and constaining sizes of cowling openings for streamlining (ala LoPriesti) than out of pure heat-transfer necessity. On a Cessna 172? The oil cooler removes heat from the engine and the medium that conveys heat to the cooler is oil. I don't see any difference between that and how water cools a water-cooled engine. In those cases where a cooler has been designed in to acheive those other criteria, niether do I, and I said so... Well, you started out by saying that oil doesn't do cooling. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:04:58 -0400, "Dennis O'Connor"
wrote: Don't underestimate the amount of heat the oil removes from the engine... It is critical... Without it's help pistons would burn up within minutes, valve springs would overheat, etc...High powered engines often have a an oil spray directed to the bottom of the piston... Yes, but spraying oil on the underside of the pistons does nothing to remove that heat from the engine! The oil just carries the heat from the piston into the oil pan. The piston/cylinder is cooler than it would be without the oil spray, but the oil/lower end of the engine is now much hotter. This is why I said that oil just reduces temperature gradients. Getting the heat out of the lower end is another matter entirely. How does the heat get carried away from the engine's lower end? If the engine has no oil cooler, then the temperature of the lower end/crankcase/oil pan will stabilize when the heat being carried away by the airflow through the cowling just matches the heat being produced inside the engine (convection). Heat loss from the engine due to radiation does a very small part of the total heat flow. The oil cooler is needed where the oil pan, case, prop hub, and tappet covers, cannot radiate the heat load adequately... I prefer to think that this is just a choice made by the designer. Clearly in high performance engines/aircraft, it is advantageous to "concentrate" some of the heat transfer from the engine to the cooling airflow into one spot, which we call an "oil cooler". As I have already pointed out, this makes possible automatic regulation of oil temperature, and LoPresti-small opening cowling. However, there are many aircraft flying without oil coolers, so a cooler is not mandantory The reason I got into this thread in the first place it to try to dispell the OWT that you cited above: "Don't underestimate the amount of heat the oil removes from the engine.". If an aircraft has no oil cooler, then the amount of heat removed from the engine by the oil is ZERO! (Unless you have a BIG leak). MikeM |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well, you're experience is somewhat limitted then. Granted. The Navions (and some others for sure) come with a large intake on the bottom of the cowl and blow air UP on to the cylinders. The principle is the same: a pressure differential is created across the cylinders. Other planes just blow air horizontally accross the engine with no vertical separation, What airplanes? some just have the cylinders stuck out in the airstream. Yes, like a radial in a Stearman, for instance. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"mikem" wrote:
The reason I got into this thread in the first place it to try to dispell the OWT that you cited above: "Don't underestimate the amount of heat the oil removes from the engine.". If an aircraft has no oil cooler, then the amount of heat removed from the engine by the oil is ZERO! (Unless you have a BIG leak). You are just splitting hairs. No, oil is not dumped out of my airplane's engine taking excess heat with it. Neither is water dumped out of my car's engine, yet the car engine is still a "water cooled" design. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:30:14 -0500, "Dan Luke"
wrote: You are just splitting hairs. No, oil is not dumped out of my airplane's engine taking excess heat with it. Neither is water dumped out of my car's engine, yet the car engine is still a "water cooled" design. But there are not many cars without a radiator, either! (except dragsters). I haven't seen a "water cooled" car for more than fifty years. Nowadays, they use a witches brew of Silicates to carry heat from the block to the radiator. The cooling takes place when air blows through the radiator... MikeM |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
oil coolers.... Areo classics vs Positech | bd-4 flyer | Home Built | 1 | January 29th 05 02:26 PM |
Sun'n Fun Used to Be the Gathering of the Good Ol' Boys of Flying | jls | Home Built | 29 | April 7th 04 01:29 AM |
Liquid to liquid coolers | Paul Millner | Home Built | 2 | July 5th 03 02:32 PM |