![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This was a little fun quiz that was circulated on a type specific
email list a few days ago. It was authored by George Braly of Advanced Pilot Seminars, and principle of GAMI. If you're familiar with George, you know he backs everything up with HARD DATA obtained from his own research. In a couple of days I'll post the correct answers (no, I didn't get them all) so that most can learn and a few can refute. Have fun. Ok... little MOGAS quiz for you. You run the Left tank dry and fill it up with premium unleaded car gas. Right tank has 100LL. Takeoff on the RH tank and climb, level off, and set up the mixture for cruise flight. Either ROP or LOP. Your choice. THEN, you switch to the LEFT tank. You change nothing else. Later you download your JPI and plot the data. 1 What is it going to show happened to the EGTs when you switched tanks? 2 What is it going to show happened to the CHTS when you switched tanks? 3 (not in the JPI, but: ) What is the airspeed going to do? Increase? Decrease? Stay the same? Why? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() - -1 What is it going to show happened to the EGTs when you switched -tanks? The EGT should show a very slight increase. The higher the octane, the smoother and cooler the burn. You have gone from 100 octane to (arguably) 87 or 93 octane and the car gas should burn hotter. - -2 What is it going to show happened to the CHTS when you switched -tanks? If the EGT (internal temperature of the cylinders) goes up, the CHT must follow suit, but at an even reduced value as regards the EGT rise. - -3 (not in the JPI, but: ) What is the airspeed going to do? Increase? -Decrease? Stay the same? Increase, ever so slightly. The efficiency (and therefore power output) of any Carnot cycle engine is a function of the temperature difference between intake and exhaust temperatures. If the intake remains constant (ambient) and the exhaust rises, the horsepower produced goes up and the airspeed...EVER SO SLIGHTLY...increases. Then again, I'm a sparky. What the hell do I know about engines. Jim Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 11:34:57 -0500, Jim Weir wrote:
- -1 What is it going to show happened to the EGTs when you switched -tanks? The EGT should show a very slight increase. The higher the octane, the smoother and cooler the burn. You have gone from 100 octane to (arguably) 87 or 93 octane and the car gas should burn hotter. I was under the (perhaps mistaken) understanding that mogas was measured on a differing octane rating system, and that 93 mogas was ~100 octane measured on the avgas system? (The question specified "premium" mogas). Given that, I'd have thought everything would have been the same, across the board. Addison |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stu Gotts wrote:
1 What is it going to show happened to the EGTs when you switched tanks? I was taught that 87 and 100LL avgas burns at the same temperature. The octane only allows the flame front to propagate smoothly through the cylinder. Autogas is a different formulation, so it may burn at a different temperature. If autogas burns cooler, the EGTs will decrease. If autogas burns hotter, the EGTs will increase. 2 What is it going to show happened to the CHTS when you switched tanks? CHTs will follow EGTs. 3 (not in the JPI, but: ) What is the airspeed going to do? Increase? Decrease? Stay the same? Why? Depends on the energy content of the fuel, not the temperature. Pistons work on pressure. The more energy released by the fuel, the more pressure is generated to drive the piston. More energy means the engine is turning faster (higher torque?). More torque transmitted to the prop produces more airspeed. That's my reasoning. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Addison Laurent wrote: I was under the (perhaps mistaken) understanding that mogas was measured on a differing octane rating system, and that 93 mogas was ~100 octane measured on the avgas system? They use a different system, but it works the other way 'round. There is no mogas that comes close to 100 octane avgas. Fortunately, most engines that are burning 100LL are actually certified for a lower octane. According the the EAA fact sheet on autogas, you can get a good idea of the octane equivalent by subtracting 5 from the mogas anti-knock index (the "octane" rating on the pump). So 93 octane mogas would be about 88 octane on the avgas scale. http://www.eaa.org/education/fuel/detonation.html George Patterson Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would not yield to the tongue. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john smith" wrote in message ... Stu Gotts wrote: 1 What is it going to show happened to the EGTs when you switched tanks? I was taught that 87 and 100LL avgas burns at the same temperature. The octane only allows the flame front to propagate smoothly through the cylinder. Autogas is a different formulation, so it may burn at a different temperature. If autogas burns cooler, the EGTs will decrease. If autogas burns hotter, the EGTs will increase. http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182149-1.html April 27, 2002 Pelican's Perch #55: Lead in the Hogwash Tetraethyl lead has been gone from automobile gasoline for two decades, and it's only a matter of time before leaded avgas goes away as well. Despite a huge amount of industry research, nobody yet has a suitable replacement fuel, and nobody's yet quite sure what will happen to today's piston-powered fleet when the supply of 100LL dries up. AVweb's John Deakin dispels a bunch of myths about TEL, explains what it does and why it's so indispensable in high-performance recips, and talks about one solution to the coming unleaded-avgas crisis that actually works. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Addison Laurent wrote: I was under the (perhaps mistaken) understanding that mogas was measured on a differing octane rating system, and that 93 mogas was ~100 octane measured on the avgas system? They use a different system, but it works the other way 'round. There is no mogas that comes close to 100 octane avgas. Fortunately, most engines that are burning 100LL are actually certified for a lower octane. According the the EAA fact sheet on autogas, you can get a good idea of the octane equivalent by subtracting 5 from the mogas anti-knock index (the "octane" rating on the pump). So 93 octane mogas would be about 88 octane on the avgas scale. http://www.eaa.org/education/fuel/detonation.html And this article as well: http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182132-1.html May 27, 2001 Pelican's Perch #43: Detonation Myths We've all been taught about detonation in piston aircraft engines. It's what occurs when combustion pressure and temperature get so high that the fuel/air mixture to explodes violently instead of burning smoothly, and it can destroy an engine in a matter of seconds. Right? Well, not exactly. AVweb's John Deakin reviews the latest research, and demonstrates that detonation occurs in various degrees - much like icing and turbulence - with the milder forms not being particularly harmful. Heavy detonation is definitely destructive, and the Pelican offers some concrete data on how to avoid it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim Weir wrote: - -1 What is it going to show happened to the EGTs when you switched -tanks? The EGT should show a very slight increase. The higher the octane, the smoother and cooler the burn. You have gone from 100 octane to (arguably) 87 or 93 octane and the car gas should burn hotter. Are not the auto and aviation octane scales different? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote in message news:1UQ2c.82422$PR3.1197113@attbi_s03... Jim Weir wrote: - -1 What is it going to show happened to the EGTs when you switched -tanks? The EGT should show a very slight increase. The higher the octane, the smoother and cooler the burn. You have gone from 100 octane to (arguably) 87 or 93 octane and the car gas should burn hotter. Are not the auto and aviation octane scales different? From http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182149-1.html April 27, 2002 Pelican's Perch #55: Lead in the Hogwash By John Deakin "If the theory of "octane" is simple, the numbers are not. It is a very common mistake in pilot lounges and coffee shops to talk about octane at the gas pump where you fill your automobile, and the pump where you fill your airplane. The calculations are VERY DIFFERENT, and they cannot be directly compared! It's like talking about knots vs. miles per hour, or using "gallons." Is that American gallons, or imperial gallons? There are several entirely different ways of measuring "octane." There is "Research Octane Number" (RON), "Motor Octane Number" (MON), "(R+M)/2" which is nothing more than an average of the two, and "Observed Road Octane Number," (RdON). Finally, there is the octane number we talk about in GA. It is close to "Motor Octane Number" but not identical. So much for standards. Actually, there are fairly good reasons for several different octane measurements, as "octane" works differently in different situations (race engines, road engines, aircraft engines, air cooled vs. water cooled, intake air temperature, RPM, etc.). For more on this, there's a short but decent explanation at http://www.osbornauto.com/octane.htm." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Before this morfs into how the innkeeper built his homemade fuel
pumper, I thought I would post the answers. I'm surprised many more didn't take a shot at this but then again, it's not regular hangar chat. How well did you do? EGT = Exhaust Gas Temperature CHT = Cylinder Head Temperature ROP = Rich of Peak LOP = Lean of Peak (and I should have listed this earlier, sorry!) The lower octane should cause a faster overall burn time and short interval to peak pressure - - and that should result in lower EGTs. For the same reasons, the peak pressure increase should cause higher CHTs. And the horsepower ?? It probably would not change much... 1-2 % . The overall effect is the same as if you had improperly advanced the timing 3-7 degrees. Regards, George Contact George at gami.com for any further explanations. Ok... little MOGAS quiz for you. You run the Left tank dry and fill it up with premium unleaded car gas. Right tank has 100LL. Takeoff on the RH tank and climb, level off, and set up the mixture for cruise flight. Either ROP or LOP. Your choice. THEN, you switch to the LEFT tank. You change nothing else. Later you download your JPI and plot the data. 1 What is it going to show happened to the EGTs when you switched tanks? 2 What is it going to show happened to the CHTS when you switched tanks? 3 (not in the JPI, but: ) What is the airspeed going to do? Increase? Decrease? Stay the same? Why? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mogas for an O-320 with 160 HP? | jls | Home Built | 3 | December 31st 04 07:48 PM |