![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
GC: I'd recommend a copy of *Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators* It's a
good start at explaining it all without getting too involved in the math. KL: Thanks for the tip. I seem to collect every book except the right one! ------------------------------------------------------ You don't seem to have any trouble with the math, so I'm not sure what value that AFNA would have for you. You're looking for more intuitive explanations than what the math provides, and that's really hard to come by. Most aerodynamics books don't have a lot of interest in providing what you want. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 at 15:34:14 in message
.net, cddb wrote: So somehow, the magic equations seem to explain my confusion...but I am not quite at peace. Au contraire. I've only talked about L/D, weight, and thrust. What about drag? I am still claiming that you'll experience an increase in drag with a weight increase REGARDLESS of whether or not you have thrust. Thus, due to the increase in drag and REGARDLESS of thrust or not, your angle THETA will be affected (i.e. theta will get larger, more negative, airplane will pitch DOWN). In the case of gliding flight, everybody but me agrees that your glide angle won't be affected. Obviously, I am wrong but I don't know why. To reiterate, that's why I've been writing all this stuff, 'cause I don't get why THETA happens to change only when you have thrust but doesn't when you don't have any and are gliding. By rearranging the simple equations I may be able to help you with that one. W= weight, L = Lift, D = Drag, t = Thrust, theta = angle of climb (if negative implies descent, V = forward speed You started with L = W*cos (theta) and T = D + W*sin(theta) For a change eliminate W from the above by taking W = L/(cos(theta) Then T = D + L*tan(theta) Let K = 0.5*density* wing area Then T = K*V^2*Cd + K*V^2*Cl Divide both sides by K*V^2 T/(K*V^2) = (Cd + Cl*tan(theta))..........................[1] Now if T= 0 the left hand side must be 0 and it follows that Cd = - Cl*tan(theta) this means that theta must be negative and tan(theta) = -Cd/Cl as one would expect. The reverse of this is that positive or negative thrust is always needed _except_ when Tan(theta) = -Cd/Cl At any other climb angle, thrust or extra drag would be needed for balance. To glide more steeply at the same Cl and Cd negative thrust would be needed Perhaps it does not help after all? Also in [1] if theta = 0 then T = K*V^2*Cd which is a necessary condition for steady level flight.. -- David CL Francis |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 at 16:59:43 in message
, Greg Esres wrote: I vote with Peter. Minimum sink is least POWER required, not least THRUST. But surely minimum sink rate is only relevant when there is no power or thrust? It requires finding a minimum value of V*sin(theta) where theta is the angle of climb (negative when descending). As I recall for a gliding aircraft minimum sink comes roughly at the AoA where (Cl^(3/2)/Cd is a maximum. This is normally at a higher AoA than maximum Cl/Cd and is some cases is quite close to the stall. Power is drag (or thrust) times velocity. -- David CL Francis |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But surely minimum sink rate is only relevant when there is no power
or thrust? I suppose so. If power were constant with airspeed, then minimum sink would also be Vy. It requires finding a minimum value of V*sin(theta) where theta is the angle of climb (negative when descending). Sounds good. As I recall for a gliding aircraft minimum sink comes roughly at the AoA where (Cl^(3/2)/Cd is a maximum. I'd have to look it up to be sure, but it looks right. This is normally at a higher AoA than maximum Cl/Cd and is some cases is quite close to the stall. Agreed, except, according to the books, the velocity of minimum power is ALWAYS less than least drag. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But surely minimum sink rate is only relevant when there is no power
or thrust? I suppose so. If power were constant with airspeed, then minimum sink would also be Vy. Yes, if power available was constant with airspeed, Vy would also be your min. sink rate speed. The books indicate that power for a piston-engine propeller combination increases with velocity. The increase is not linear though. The derivative dP/dV looks to be of the form y = -mx + b. Kinda like an upside down smiley face with only the left side showing. Thrust available looks fairly constant w.r.t. velocity. It requires finding a minimum value of V*sin(theta) where theta is the angle of climb (negative when descending). Sounds good. As I recall for a gliding aircraft minimum sink comes roughly at the AoA where (Cl^(3/2)/Cd is a maximum. I'd have to look it up to be sure, but it looks right. That's correct. Min sink rate would occur at the AOA where 1/[(Cl^3/2)/cd] is a minimum as it is the point of least power required. Min. thrust required is proportional to 1/(Cl/Cd). This is normally at a higher AoA than maximum Cl/Cd and is some cases is quite close to the stall. Agreed, except, according to the books, the velocity of minimum power is ALWAYS less than least drag. What book are you reading Greg? My references indicate the same for a Cessna Skylane. If you assume no power available, then, your min. sink (best endurance) speed is less than your best glide speed. My Cessna 172SP POH lists a best glide speed of 68 kts. Best endurance speed isn't exactly mentioned but I've heard it's close to stall. I just recall someone saying "If you want to stay up for as long as you can, fly close to stall". Do you know why the POH doesn't mention that speed? Would that be giving away too much? Oh, by the way, could you please give a shot at answering my questions that are contained in my Nov. 27 reply to Gerry Caron? (in this same overall post) Thanks, Alex |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dunno if this has already come up in these threads, but John Denker has a
great geometric presentation of the interdependency of weight, power, speed, and flight angle at http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/power.html#sec-power-curve. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 at 01:19:53 in message
, Greg Esres wrote: This is normally at a higher AoA than maximum Cl/Cd and is some cases is quite close to the stall. Agreed, except, according to the books, the velocity of minimum power is ALWAYS less than least drag. Sounds reasonable and I don't think it is inconsistent. -- David CL Francis |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|