![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
About this time of year, I like visit the ANN site and see Zoom rant about
how we shouldn't fly within 200 miles of SNF because of the dangers involved. And how I will be killed just by parking in the dangerous parking lot! Was he finally silenced? Not only was he banned from the grounds, but now, (hopefully) can't talk about it? What? No more 10 part series? I'm gonna take my chances. I'm heading down (from Ohio) tomorrow at 9am. Wish me luck! Cheers, Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:54:39 GMT, "Bob Knot" wrote:
About this time of year, I like visit the ANN site and see Zoom rant about how we shouldn't fly within 200 miles of SNF because of the dangers involved. And how I will be killed just by parking in the dangerous parking lot! Was he finally silenced? Not only was he banned from the grounds, but now, (hopefully) can't talk about it? What? No more 10 part series? Zoom's lawyer has been busy over the past three months. I'm not a lawyer, but in going through the filings, it appears to me that Zoom has a decent attorney this time. I suspect he has strongly suggested that Zoom leave SnF alone until this case is settled. The papers filed included a couple that provided some answers to SnF's interrogatories, added another defendant to the case, and claimed that SnF's attorney was being too slow in responding to filings. There are been one or two amusing points in Campbell's responses to SnF's interrogatories. He claims, for instance, that SnF's actions have caused him financial injury. As part of its interrogatories, SNF thus requested..."Plaintiffs financial statements, profit and loss statements, balance sheets, and all other financial documents of Plaintiff for the years, 2000,2001, and 2002." Campbell's response: "There are no documents relevant to [the] request." Seems odd that he has *no* financial records for ANN. Could be hard to prove the financial damages he claims in his suit. He also gives the same response when asked for circulation figures... "No documents showing the circulation" of ANN. (Plaintiff's Response to Request to Produce by Defendant, 4 February 2004) Sun-N-Fun also requested the names of advertisers who dropped their advertising with ANN because of SnF's alleged transgressions. Allow me to quote from Zoom's response: "The names of the advertisers who were influenced not to advertise with the Plaintiff s business as a result of the slander alleged in the complaint a ..... "4] Pulsar Aircraft Co. in El Monte, California for $3,500.00." (Additional and Amended Answers to Interrogatories, 3 Feb 2004) Keep in mind that Campbell's lawsuit is based on actions taken by the Fly-In during SnF 2002...and Campbell sued Pulsar that same week, claiming they'd ordered advertising but hadn't paid for it. Pulsar won that case, of course. But I don't really imagine Zoom will ask them to testify in his behalf.... This has an odd echo in another area, where Zoom has identified an individual as one who would attest to some of SnF's actions. Rumor has it that this person had a falling-out with Zoom. Just speculation based on one or two external signs. But it might be interesting, if SnF insists that he be deposed. There have been a couple of interesting filings in the past two weeks (a Motion to Compel and a Consent Order), but I haven't got copies of them yet. If there's anything interesting, I'll post it. I wouldn't be at all surprised if these were filings made in an attempt to get admittance this year. Could happen, depending on whether SnF's attorney wants to make the Fly-In look "reasonable" to the judge and thus not fight the request. BTW, another judge recently ruled in favor of SnF in an unrelated case, the one involving the overrun crash at the ultralight runway several years ago that killed the pilot and injured a teenager. The kid's family had sued the estate of the pilot and SnF, but SnF was quickly dismissed from that case. The estate settled out of court, then turned around and sued SnF. The judge ruled in favor of SnF in February, but the pilot's estate has filed an appeal. Ron Wanttaja |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() (Plaintiff's Response to Request to Produce by Defendant, 4 February 2004) Sun-N-Fun also requested the names of advertisers who dropped their advertising with ANN because of SnF's alleged transgressions. Allow me to quote from Zoom's response: "The names of the advertisers who were influenced not to advertise with the Plaintiff s business as a result of the slander alleged in the complaint a .... "4] Pulsar Aircraft Co. in El Monte, California for $3,500.00." (Additional and Amended Answers to Interrogatories, 3 Feb 2004) Keep in mind that Campbell's lawsuit is based on actions taken by the Fly-In during SnF 2002...and Campbell sued Pulsar that same week, claiming they'd ordered advertising but hadn't paid for it. Pulsar won that case, of course. But I don't really imagine Zoom will ask them to testify in his behalf.... This has an odd echo in another area, where Zoom has identified an individual as one who would attest to some of SnF's actions. Rumor has it that this person had a falling-out with Zoom. Just speculation based on one or two external signs. But it might be interesting, if SnF insists that he be deposed. There have been a couple of interesting filings in the past two weeks (a Motion to Compel and a Consent Order), but I haven't got copies of them yet. If there's anything interesting, I'll post it. I wouldn't be at all surprised if these were filings made in an attempt to get admittance this year. Could happen, depending on whether SnF's attorney wants to make the Fly-In look "reasonable" to the judge and thus not fight the request. Bob Reed www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site) KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress.... "Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!" (M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Seems odd that he has *no* financial records for ANN. Could be hard to prove the financial damages he claims in his suit. He also gives the same response when asked for circulation figures... "No documents showing the circulation" of ANN. (Plaintiff's Response to Request to Produce by Defendant, 4 February 2004) Sun-N-Fun also requested the names of advertisers who dropped their advertising with ANN because of SnF's alleged transgressions. Allow me to quote from Zoom's response: "The names of the advertisers who were influenced not to advertise with the Plaintiff s business as a result of the slander alleged in the complaint a .... "4] Pulsar Aircraft Co. in El Monte, California for $3,500.00." (Additional and Amended Answers to Interrogatories, 3 Feb 2004) Keep in mind that Campbell's lawsuit is based on actions taken by the Fly-In during SnF 2002...and Campbell sued Pulsar that same week, claiming they'd ordered advertising but hadn't paid for it. Pulsar won that case, of course. But I don't really imagine Zoom will ask them to testify in his behalf.... This has an odd echo in another area, where Zoom has identified an individual as one who would attest to some of SnF's actions. Rumor has it that this person had a falling-out with Zoom. Just speculation based on one or two external signs. But it might be interesting, if SnF insists that he be deposed. It would be very interesting indeed since one of the reasons for Sun-N-Fun baring Campbell was his use of the show to harras some of the vendors there. He used the Sun-N-Fun event once again in 2002 to serve the lawsuit against Pulsar and forced Pulsar to return to Florida from California to respond in court regarding that lawsuit. The obvious idea that nobody would spend more money on lawyers and commercial airfares to fight a suit that could settled for just $3500. He was wrong, Pulsar won and the owner represented himself in court. Seems that zoom had tried to use the old if you don't reply to the negative, we will run the ad and bill you for it anyway tactic. Apparently didn't accept that as a valid contract for services. Bob Reed www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site) KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress.... "Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!" (M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|