Another Addition to the Rec.Aviation Rogue's Gallery!

YES sir mister sixkiller now go F yourself. I got your poinit the first time.
My second post was a correction to where I said "RON" instead of "ED" as Ed was
the orginal poster. NOW why don't you "READ VERY CLOSELY?"

Tom Sixkiller wrote:

"Jerry Springer" wrote in message
link.net...

Correction that should have said "I agree with ED"

Jerry



Listen VERY closely:

POINT #1 - Ed was bitching that Jay's points were SPAM.

POINT #2 - They pointers to Jay's web site are the part that is DEDICATED
TO THIS NEWS GROUP

You might also...


Jerry Springer wrote:



Tom Sixkiller wrote:


"Ed Wischmeyer" wrote in message
...


Enough of this spam in disguise advertising your motel...

Ed Wischmeyer



Ummmm...Ed? You can remove your foot from your mouth anytime

now...we'll

pretend not to notice.




Why does he need to remove foot? I agree with Ron, I like Jay and he
contributes to this NG but I really don't think we need to know each
time someone posts to his web site.

Jerry

On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:52:07 -0700, Tom Sixkiller wrote:

Maybe because the web site he references is DEDICATED TO THIS NEWSGROUP?
^^^^^^^^

the web SITE is (hopefully) dedicated to his business.

#m
--
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19990509

Jeezuz, people, lighten up. If you don't like Jay's posts, don't read them. It
ain't rocket science to figure out how your killfile works.

I for one like to see the new pictures. If Jay didn't post, I probably wouldn't
go there once a year. It isn't like he is directing you to the main page where
you have to wade through a bunch of advertising bushwa to get to the
pictures...the URL takes you directly to the pictures page.


Jim


Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

Some people will complain even when hung with a new rope!

"Jim Weir" wrote in message
...
Jeezuz, people, lighten up. If you don't like Jay's posts, don't read
them. It
ain't rocket science to figure out how your killfile works.

I for one like to see the new pictures. If Jay didn't post, I probably
wouldn't
go there once a year. It isn't like he is directing you to the main page
where
you have to wade through a bunch of advertising bushwa to get to the
pictures...the URL takes you directly to the pictures page.


Jim


Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

"Jerry Springer" wrote in message
link.net...
YES sir mister sixkiller now go F yourself. I got your poinit the first
time.
My second post was a correction to where I said "RON" instead of "ED" as
Ed was
the orginal poster. NOW why don't you "READ VERY CLOSELY?"

Read it again: The point I was making was the reference to SPAM...you're use
of the wrong name was immaterial.

Considering your propensity for grammatical and other mistakes, I won't make
the point of your incredible lack of reading, comprehension, and other
skills.


Why don't you go away...your mothers calling you.

"Jim Weir" wrote in message
...
Jeezuz, people, lighten up. If you don't like Jay's posts, don't read
them. It
ain't rocket science to figure out how your killfile works.

I for one like to see the new pictures. If Jay didn't post, I probably
wouldn't
go there once a year. It isn't like he is directing you to the main page
where
you have to wade through a bunch of advertising bushwa to get to the
pictures...the URL takes you directly to the pictures page.


Forget it, Jim. There are some that just won't grow up.

"Cy Galley" wrote in message
news:mGCOb.95717$na.51203@attbi_s04...
Some people will complain even when hung with a new rope!

Only if it's one of those that itches a lot.


"Jim Weir" wrote in message
...
Jeezuz, people, lighten up. If you don't like Jay's posts, don't read
them. It
ain't rocket science to figure out how your killfile works.

I for one like to see the new pictures. If Jay didn't post, I probably
wouldn't
go there once a year. It isn't like he is directing you to the main
page
where
you have to wade through a bunch of advertising bushwa to get to the
pictures...the URL takes you directly to the pictures page.


Jim


Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

You are the moron that seem to have a reading problem, now go play with yourself
somewhere else. It is spam to post the same thing over and over in a newsgroup.
think how cluttered the NG would be if everyone that had a web site posted
everytime something was added to it. We all know Jay has a section dedicated to
aircraft pictures so maybe once a week he should just post his URL insteead of
each time someone adds to it.
BTW my mother has been dead for two years. Now as I said go F yourself somewhere
else.


Tom Sixkiller wrote:
"Jerry Springer" wrote in message
link.net...

YES sir mister sixkiller now go F yourself. I got your poinit the first

time.

My second post was a correction to where I said "RON" instead of "ED" as

Ed was

the orginal poster. NOW why don't you "READ VERY CLOSELY?"


Read it again: The point I was making was the reference to SPAM...you're use
of the wrong name was immaterial.

Considering your propensity for grammatical and other mistakes, I won't make
the point of your incredible lack of reading, comprehension, and other
skills.


Why don't you go away...your mothers calling you.

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote:

Ed was bitching that Jay's points were SPAM.

Ed was right, it is spam. It is crossposted commercial spam guised as
update notices. One would have to be quite naive to think that Jay has
no commercial motive in his almost daily crossposted update notices.
Most people resent commercial spam no matter how guised. That's why
there is so little of it here. If people didn't resent it, then all
sorts of aviation related companies would be posting frequent website
and product "update" notices here. Yes, it's been tried by many
companies in the past but virtually all gave it up eventually. It
would be a mistake for Jay to take the support of a handful of his RAP
homeys as an indication of majority support in this.

Lance W wrote:

It
would be a mistake for Jay to take the support of a handful of his RAP
homeys as an indication of majority support in this.

I suspect that Jay's RAP friends ARE the majority.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."