![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Unfortunately, the action is so barbaric that I nearly barfed. (Example: A ten minute scene with Jesus being whipped -- nearly to death -- with fishhook-laden whips. If you want to see a human have his skin torn off in slow, graphic detail -- front AND back -- this is the movie for you.) Lol - Reminds me of "Itchy and Scratchy" sub-cartoon of The Simpsons where they take blood and gore to ridiculous proportions - mainly as a jab at the desensitization of the American public (they always show the kids laughing hysterically at the cat's ultimate demise). Keep in mind the only goal of this movie is to make money, and exploitation films are very profitable. The question is: what or who is being exploited? ![]() |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 03:50:02 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: Just visited "alt.religion" for the first time (after taking the kids to see "The Passion of the Christ" this evening. Tip of the Day: Don't waste your money -- we ended up walking out mid-way through. This movie makes "Scarface" look like a Disney flick...), and what a bizarre walk on the Dark Side THAT was! After ten minutes of lurking in that group, I started to feel unclean and began pining for "home" amongst you guys and gals. Man, their fights make ours look like the polite discussions they really are... Thank you, all, for being voices of sanity amongst the rabble. Getting religion after a life of sin is the first sign of insanity. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Doze people over dere be CRAZY! |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:42:51 -0500, "Dennis O'Connor"
wrote: You simply demonstrated that you are capable of rational thought... And, I was not able to get past the opening of Saving Private Ryan, so I have not seen it either obviously... During the holidays, my family was upstairs with the big screen TV and the Sorround Sound shaking the house as they watched it... I went out to the shop and tinkered with the RV7... Actually, I'm not big on cinema fantasy in any event... I think the last movie I watched in it's entirety was when the original Star Wars screened, so as usual I am the odd man out - though I did manage almost half of Batman recently, before I got bored and wandered downstairs to watch the cat chase her tail... denny For me it's strictly escapist stuff. Sci-fi, fantasy, and wellll... some documentaries. I've never even seen a so called "reality show" and rarely even bother to turn on the local network affiliates. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com "Jay Honeck" wrote The movie is quite disturbing, IMHO. It takes a lot to make me ill, and I can't remember the last movie I walked out of before the end -- but this movie managed to get me to do both. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damian writes:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:52:13 GMT, "Jay Honeck" wrote: That was a good flick. Unless you'd actually read the books by Patrick O'Brian (the Far Side of the World is number 10 of 20) - arguably the finest fiction of the Royal Navy in the Napoleonic period, when you'd realise the film was a pale imitation of the books. Go find them - they are absolutely excellent. The first volume is Master and Commander. I'm not knocking the film, or your enjoyment, just saying if you enjoyed that, you'd love the books even more. As always with movies made from the book, the movie is just a pale imitation. However, for people who like to *see* things it has quite a lot to see -- some rather nice footage of the ship sailing through a storm, firing the big guns, and the confusion of a boarding action come to mind as particularly well done. Great books, certainly. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Photos: dd-b.lighthunters.net Snapshots: www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" writes:
"Damian" wrote: That was a good flick. Unless you'd actually read the books by Patrick O'Brian (the Far Side of the World is number 10 of 20) - arguably the finest fiction of the Royal Navy in the Napoleonic period, when you'd realise the film was a pale imitation of the books. Go find them - they are absolutely excellent. Amen. Easily the most entertaining, absorbing fiction I've ever read. Not just for the thrilling sea action but also for the wonderful insights into early 19th century life. They're funny, too. O'Brian was a great writer - sad he's gone. Warning: these books are utterly addicting, and there are 20 (?) of them. Yep, 20 of the Aubrey-Maturin books. (There are some other O'Brian books, but they're not part of the series and not very similar.) When you run out of that there's always Dudley Pope, and C.S. Forrester, and even Alexander Kent if you're really desperate (I never made it all the way through the Kent books). And David Donachie, and Walter Jon Williams, and lots of other people. It's interesting to see the different research coming out :-). -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Photos: dd-b.lighthunters.net Snapshots: www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ......(after taking the kids to see "The Passion of the Christ" this evening. What on earth would have induced you to take kids to that movie? Have you been unaware of the controversy? Oddly, the controversy seems to have centered on whether the movie is anti-Semitic, not its violence. Since the only people who consider the movie to be anti-Semitic are a bunch of intransigent hotheads who think any mention of the crucifixion of Jesus is anti-Semitic, many people felt that it was reasonable to ignore such extremist views. Seriously, the only way that the ADL would not have been offended is if Mel Gibson had depicted Christ as dying of appendicitis despite the heroic efforts of his rabbinical doctors. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... He elaborated: "Put it this way. My wife is a saint. She's a much better person than I am. Honestly. She's, like, Episcopalian, Church of England. She prays, she believes in God, she knows Jesus, she believes in that stuff. And it's just not fair if she doesn't make it; she's better than I am. But that is a pronouncement from the chair. I go with it." That's creepy. No. Mel Gibson does not feel like arguing with God. However, he has been misinformed as to what God's opinion is. :-) |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "cn8cg" wrote in message ... Religious nut stuff. As opposed to anti-religious nuts, I suppose. Frankly, the supposedly non-religious appear to be every bit as dangerous and bigoted as the very devout. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article puT1c.461993$I06.5242721@attbi_s01, Jay Honeck
wrote: The movie is quite disturbing, IMHO. It takes a lot to make me ill, and I can't remember the last movie I walked out of before the end -- but this movie managed to get me to do both. Why it isn't rated NC-17, I have no clue. That's what this country has turned into. Unspeakable violence gets an R-rating, but one flash of frontal nudity merits an immediate NC-17. With all this talk about "desensitizing" kids to violence, which one would you rather have then see as a teenager? Here's a clip from the last paragraph of Roger Ebert's review of /Passion/ : == Note: I said the film is the most violent I have ever seen. It will probably be the most violent you have ever seen. This is not a criticism but an observation; the film is unsuitable for younger viewers, but works powerfully for those who can endure it. The MPAA's R rating is definitive proof that the organization either will never give the NC-17 rating for violence alone, or was intimidated by the subject matter. If it had been anyone other than Jesus up on that cross, I have a feeling that NC-17 would have been automatic. == Interesting. -- Garner R. Miller ATP/CFII/MEI Manchester, CT =USA= |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tony Cox wrote: "Cecil E. Chapman" wrote in message om... If Christ was born in the time and place that the Bible(s) claim, then he would have been a bit over 5 feet tall, have dark brown to nearly black skin, and be of distinctly non Caucasian visage... Oh come on! Don't ya know he looked like Ted Nuggent?,,,, Funny, I always think of Paul Rubin (Peewee Herman). Oh well, to each his own... Unlikely. A carpenter in that period would be a very muscular man, though not in the way body builders are. And someone a bit over 5 feet tall would be about the same height as everyone else, so, unless you're going to photograph the actor standing beside a yardstick, it doesn't matter how tall the actor actually is as long as he's about the same height as the other guys in the picture. In this day and age, anything from 5'9" to 6' would do. Dennis is, of course, absolutely correct about the complexion, but Christ hasn't been portrayed correctly since about 300 AD (if then). George Patterson A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|