![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run
it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights). What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me plan a flight to and from it. A minor but irritating problem. It wasn't a problem with the earlier tool. Going to have to call them since there doesn't seem to be any online help or support on the topic. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I called AOPA to inquire about the fact the Flight Planner didn't allow
a user defined route; it's direct or airways. They said they had to keep it simple. You can go and strech the rubber band route. You know, for simple flight planning, the DUATS Cirrus dial-up application cannot be beat. Gives you interface with DUATs winds, can plan airways, direct, user defined. I have my plane profiled and I usually am within 5 to 10 minutes of my flight time and a couple of gallons of fuel burn. I get a real simple printable flight plan to take away with me. Ross N7905U Maule Driver wrote: I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights). What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me plan a flight to and from it. A minor but irritating problem. It wasn't a problem with the earlier tool. Going to have to call them since there doesn't seem to be any online help or support on the topic. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maule Driver" writes:
I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights). I flight plan on whatever machine I have handy. Often is borrowed. It continues to amaze me that companies try *so* hard to avoid making applications that just work on the Web. What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me plan a flight to and from it. From the related thread, I gather this means that AOPA assumes that only a small fraction of their members would ever want to use that airport so it's not worth spending resources to support it. --kyler |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyler Laird wrote:
From the related thread, I gather this means that AOPA assumes that only a small fraction of their members would ever want to use that airport so it's not worth spending resources to support it. Laugh Uh oh. A small fraction of AOPA members use any airport. - Andrew |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Maule Driver" said:
I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights). Isn't the old AOPA one just http://www.duats.com/ with the AOPA name plastered on it? What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me It's on duats.com. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ Microsoft - Where quality is job 1.0.1 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is
not in the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me plan a flight to and from it. A minor but irritating problem. I see it more of as a major flaw. It's a pretty useless tool to me. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Tomblin" In a previous article, "Maule Driver" said: I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights). Isn't the old AOPA one just http://www.duats.com/ with the AOPA name plastered on it? What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me It's on duats.com. You are right. It was just duats.com with AOPA on it. I think I'll go back to it. The 8nc8 omission is a real pain. AOPA seems to be paying a lot of attention to the airspace restrictions so maybe that's what it's good for. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
********* Shameless Plug ************
While not free, my Win32 planner is low cost compared to the competition and it includes digital sectionals. It will run on any version of windows from 95 on, and can run under Virtual PC on a Mac. It may run under WINE on a Linux machine. It was developed using Delphi, and I can easily offer it in a .NET version. Rumor has it that .NET will soon be supported on both Linux and Mac machines. Download the demo and give it a try: http://www.razorsedgesoft.com/airplan I will have a booth at Oshkosh this year, so stop by and see me there. Dean Wilkinson "Maule Driver" wrote in message m... I preferred the earlier one because it was web based and allowed me to run it wherever I was on whoever's system I was using (including my friend's Macs where I've planned and filed dozens of flights). What really is irritating me is the fact that my home 'port, 8NC8, is not in the airport database. Making it a waypoint still doesn't seem to allow me plan a flight to and from it. A minor but irritating problem. It wasn't a problem with the earlier tool. Going to have to call them since there doesn't seem to be any online help or support on the topic. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Kyler Laird wrote: From the related thread, I gather this means that AOPA assumes that only a small fraction of their members would ever want to use that airport so it's not worth spending resources to support it. I could be wrong, but I think you should blame Jeppesen, not AOPA. The download page says that Jep provides the software. George Patterson Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would not yield to the tongue. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AOPA's flight planner was introduced to give users better ability to plot
TFRs than what the old DUATS flight planner had. It was written by Jeppesen and is the same software that the FAA uses to plot TFRs. It is based on Jeppesen's FliteStar software and had the TFR plotting ability even before FliteStar had it. However, like all freeware, I suspect it is deliberately crippled so as to not affect FliteStar's sales. 8NC8 is in the database for both FliteStar and the AOPA flight planner. For some reason the AOPA flight planner will not let you use it, although you can see it plotted on the chart if you zoom in enough. You can click on it and get the information about it. 7 NM NE of Durham, NC (Durham County) N 36° 03.6' W 78° 47.0' Magnetic Variation: 9.1°W Elevation: 309' Cincinnati Sectional Owner: Private, Permitted Use: Private Position Estimated, Elevation Surveyed It looks like a bug (in the software -- the airport does not look like a bug). There is no problem including it in FlightStar flight plans, so this is a peculiarity of the crippled AOPA version. I kind of wonder if the AOPA software treats all private airports like this? It will not allow WA96 (Port Orchard, WA), either. Maybe the lawyers got hold of it and worried about liability. Several people have mentioned Cirrus flight planning software. Cirrus is going away. A free standalone replacement called "Golden Eagle FlightPrep" has been developed by the same people who developed Cirrus, but I could not find on their web site what the operating requirements will be. It will be formally introduced in April at Sun n Fun. Cirrus was not developed by DUATS, but both Cirrus and Golden Eagle FlightPrep are promoted on the DUATS web site. An online version of FlightPrep is available by paid subscription. It will run on either Mac or Windows environments. The Mac notice has a disclaimer that says "check computer requirements," but they don't seem to have posted anywhere what those computer requirements are. It looks like the online version compares favorably with Aeroplanner. They give a discount to AOPA members. www.flightprep.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |