![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Where's the similarity?
It opens doors - doors that people didn't even think were there. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... It opens doors - doors that people didn't even think were there. How so? |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It opens doors - doors that people didn't even think were there. How so? By demonstrating that these things can be done. When people get used to that idea, they begin to think about the uses that these things can be put to. Right now there are people that believe that private suborbital flight is a silly stunt, and won't even think of its implications. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... The earlier flights were not done in a re-usable spacecraft. So what? So that is a large part of what makes it different from the single-shot suborbital flights of the past. Not to mention the thousands of man-hours and cast of thousands needed to turn around the shuttle. One step on the road to non-government, gold-plated, decades-long development projects type spaceflight. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... By demonstrating that these things can be done. We already know they can be done. These things were demonstrated over forty years ago. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Hix" wrote in message ... So that is a large part of what makes it different from the single-shot suborbital flights of the past. As another poster has already pointed out, two of the four previous manned suborbital space flights were done with reusable craft. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Steven P. McNicoll" said:
"Teacherjh" wrote in message ... By demonstrating that these things can be done. We already know they can be done. These things were demonstrated over forty years ago. By hugely expensive government programs. This is metaphorically like the garage tinkerer of 1930s science fiction novels going to space. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ " Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. " - Groucho Marx |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We already know they can be done. These things were demonstrated over forty
years ago. And done for just a few piddly millions of dollars by nearly garage level tinkers and builders? I think not.. take care Blll |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We already know they can be done.
No, we didn't. Not these things. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BllFs6" wrote in message ... And done for just a few piddly millions of dollars by nearly garage level tinkers and builders? I think not.. So what is the significance of it being redone relatively cheaply by garage level tinkerers and builders? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rutan hits 200k feet! Almost there! | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Military Aviation | 150 | May 22nd 04 07:20 PM |
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 10 | May 20th 04 10:12 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) | Peter Stickney | Military Aviation | 45 | February 11th 04 04:46 AM |