![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hit a mountain wave today near Pikes Peak at FL190 in my TR-182. First I
couldn't maintain FL190 (I only have 300-400 fpm climb at that altitude anyway) as my indicated airspeed descended to 80 K. Called ATC, got a block altitude, FL 180 - 200. About a minute later I needed the upside. Shot to over 2000 fpm climb (VSI was pegged) and with the nose pointed way down leveled off at FL 195 and ground speed of 190 knots. Fun stuff. Michael |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had a similar encounter over the Adirondacks transitting Vermont. My VSI
started indicating a 100-200 ft/min descent and I subsequently pulled up. Soon I found myself with full power, 80 kts indicated and a sorry-looking groundspeed. ATC asked about my indicated airspeed and I asked for lower. Once cleared, (you guessed it) I hit the other side of the wave and my airspeed went into the yellow arc while maintaining level flight--forcing me to reduce power. All this in a Warrior at about 6000 feet MSL. Asked a couple of people about this and the ones who experienced it all agreed it was freaky at first and all of our initial reactions were to scan the panel for a problem. Marco "Michael 182" wrote in message news:Bwq0d.166098$Fg5.68105@attbi_s53... Hit a mountain wave today near Pikes Peak at FL190 in my TR-182. First I couldn't maintain FL190 (I only have 300-400 fpm climb at that altitude anyway) as my indicated airspeed descended to 80 K. Called ATC, got a block altitude, FL 180 - 200. About a minute later I needed the upside. Shot to over 2000 fpm climb (VSI was pegged) and with the nose pointed way down leveled off at FL 195 and ground speed of 190 knots. Fun stuff. Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm. What time today were you overflying the peak. My in-laws are in
town and we took them up there around 1400 this afternoon. That was about the time the snow and freezing rain hit with a lot of high winds. Just as a side note, I was out flying around 1100 this morning at COS and even tho it was calm on the ground, we got up 1000' agl and with all the virga around, it got real bumpy even at that low an altitude Scott D. On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:11:34 GMT, "Michael 182" wrote: Hit a mountain wave today near Pikes Peak at FL190 in my TR-182. First I couldn't maintain FL190 (I only have 300-400 fpm climb at that altitude anyway) as my indicated airspeed descended to 80 K. Called ATC, got a block altitude, FL 180 - 200. About a minute later I needed the upside. Shot to over 2000 fpm climb (VSI was pegged) and with the nose pointed way down leveled off at FL 195 and ground speed of 190 knots. Fun stuff. Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wait til you hit a rotor. That's REAL fun. My one and only
experience had me lose about 2000' in maybe 10 seconds. People told me that was impossible, but then they weren't there. We were negative G for that time. John Michael 182 wrote: Hit a mountain wave today near Pikes Peak at FL190 in my TR-182. First I couldn't maintain FL190 (I only have 300-400 fpm climb at that altitude anyway) as my indicated airspeed descended to 80 K. Called ATC, got a block altitude, FL 180 - 200. About a minute later I needed the upside. Shot to over 2000 fpm climb (VSI was pegged) and with the nose pointed way down leveled off at FL 195 and ground speed of 190 knots. Fun stuff. Michael |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't understand. You generally don't get mountain wave and virga at the
same time. One requires stable air and the other generally occurs in unstable air. Mike MU-2 Scott D. wrote in message ... Hmm. What time today were you overflying the peak. My in-laws are in town and we took them up there around 1400 this afternoon. That was about the time the snow and freezing rain hit with a lot of high winds. Just as a side note, I was out flying around 1100 this morning at COS and even tho it was calm on the ground, we got up 1000' agl and with all the virga around, it got real bumpy even at that low an altitude Scott D. On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:11:34 GMT, "Michael 182" wrote: Hit a mountain wave today near Pikes Peak at FL190 in my TR-182. First I couldn't maintain FL190 (I only have 300-400 fpm climb at that altitude anyway) as my indicated airspeed descended to 80 K. Called ATC, got a block altitude, FL 180 - 200. About a minute later I needed the upside. Shot to over 2000 fpm climb (VSI was pegged) and with the nose pointed way down leveled off at FL 195 and ground speed of 190 knots. Fun stuff. Michael |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was a little west of the Peak at about 2:00pm mountain yesterday. There
were wave clouds evident all over at FL 190, none of which you would have seen from below the deck. Michael Scott D. wrote in message ... Hmm. What time today were you overflying the peak. My in-laws are in town and we took them up there around 1400 this afternoon. That was about the time the snow and freezing rain hit with a lot of high winds. Just as a side note, I was out flying around 1100 this morning at COS and even tho it was calm on the ground, we got up 1000' agl and with all the virga around, it got real bumpy even at that low an altitude Scott D. On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:11:34 GMT, "Michael 182" wrote: Hit a mountain wave today near Pikes Peak at FL190 in my TR-182. First I couldn't maintain FL190 (I only have 300-400 fpm climb at that altitude anyway) as my indicated airspeed descended to 80 K. Called ATC, got a block altitude, FL 180 - 200. About a minute later I needed the upside. Shot to over 2000 fpm climb (VSI was pegged) and with the nose pointed way down leveled off at FL 195 and ground speed of 190 knots. Fun stuff. Michael |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He saw the virga at 11:00 am. The waves were evident at 2:00 pm. Evidently
the winds hit the front range in the afternoon. Michael "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message k.net... I don't understand. You generally don't get mountain wave and virga at the same time. One requires stable air and the other generally occurs in unstable air. Mike MU-2 Scott D. wrote in message ... Hmm. What time today were you overflying the peak. My in-laws are in town and we took them up there around 1400 this afternoon. That was about the time the snow and freezing rain hit with a lot of high winds. Just as a side note, I was out flying around 1100 this morning at COS and even tho it was calm on the ground, we got up 1000' agl and with all the virga around, it got real bumpy even at that low an altitude Scott D. On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:11:34 GMT, "Michael 182" wrote: Hit a mountain wave today near Pikes Peak at FL190 in my TR-182. First I couldn't maintain FL190 (I only have 300-400 fpm climb at that altitude anyway) as my indicated airspeed descended to 80 K. Called ATC, got a block altitude, FL 180 - 200. About a minute later I needed the upside. Shot to over 2000 fpm climb (VSI was pegged) and with the nose pointed way down leveled off at FL 195 and ground speed of 190 knots. Fun stuff. Michael |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael,
Fun stuff. Now imagine doing that in a glider and getting up to FL300. Did that in the Lake Tahoe area once. Wow! -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:03:24 -0400, Todd Pattist
wrote in :: BTW, pilots, particularly in airplanes, should be really careful about slowing down and trying to outclimb a mountain wave. The preferred response is to put the nose down and go fast (assuming you can get a clearance for a lower alt if you're not VFR). It's often impossible to climb faster than the sinking air. Slowing down just gives teh air longer to try to shove you down into those granite bumpy things below that are causing the wave. The best response is usually to get through the down cycle of the wave as quickly as you can. It's also the most efficient response, particuarly when coupled with slowing during the up part of the wave. Right. That's what glider guiders do: slow in rising air, and dive through downdrafts. But when I discussed this with a CFII, he said, "what goes up, comes down." His advise was to hold a constant airspeed while flying VFR through wave activity, and permit altitude excursions to occur. In the end it should all balance out, and the pilot should find himself at approximately the same altitude at which he entered the wave activity upon exiting it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
But when I discussed this with a CFII, he said, "what goes up, comes down." His advise was to hold a constant airspeed while flying VFR through wave activity, and permit altitude excursions to occur. As a glider pilot, I've never understood this hold-the-altitude-itis of my motorised brethren. Deliberately wasting this huge amount of energy which mother nature offers for free! Stefan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Flying Course? | Nicholas Kliewer | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | May 9th 04 05:29 AM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
McCall, Idaho: Mountain and Canyon Flying Seminars | [email protected] | Piloting | 6 | March 21st 04 07:45 AM |
ADV: CPA Mountain Flying Course 2004 Dates | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | February 13th 04 04:30 AM |
British pilot (in Britain), survives forced mountain landing | Tim K | Piloting | 3 | July 11th 03 04:14 PM |