![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lets hope they don't take anyone else WITH them during the qualifying
trials for a DA Dave john smith wrote: Let em go, CJ. They are Darwin Award candidates. C J Campbell wrote: The prediction now is for a much bigger eruption than originally expected. I would strongly discourage sightseeing trips in the area. One of the things that really bothers me is the crowds of people that have come to see the mountain. They are sitting in the middle of literally miles of downed trees: trees that have all fallen in a direction away from the mountain. Hardly a blade of grass grows there almost 25 years after the blast. Yet they think they are far enough away to be safe. They don't seem to get a clue from the total devastation that surrounds them. I know scientists don't expect another eruption like 1980. Well, they didn't expect it in 1980, either. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm not going to go flying around the mountain, but to claim that the mountain could have a major eruption when nothing of the sort is predicted is pretty silly. Pete The spirit of Harry Truman is alive and well. John |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rutger wrote:
... a situation where the Earth might actually rise up to smite thee, regardless of how well thou maintainest thy airspeed. hehe... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message Hardly a blade of grass grows there almost 25 years after the blast. Yet they think they are far enough away to be safe. They don't seem to get a clue from the total devastation that surrounds them. I know scientists don't expect another eruption like 1980. Well, they didn't expect it in 1980, either. It's just that there's a few hundred million tons less of mountain to erupt now. You could put the entire population of the world in the 1980 crater and not fill it up. You wanna see something sad? Go to the visitor's observatory (when it opens) They've got a great demo of how the mountain erupts, buries the countryside in hundreds of feet of molten ash, and then how the forest rebuilds itself and life goes on in a miraculously short time; then they tell you not to walk off the trail or pick up rocks because the ecosystem is fragile. Another sign says 'If Mt.St Helens would have wanted you to take souvenirs, she would have given them to you.' OK...I remember wearing a dusk mask for a week while my parents put pantyhose over the car's air filter. I'll take that as permission, thanks. -c |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message They didn't expect it? Is that why they did a full-scale evacuation? The red zone is for the loading and unloading... Fact is, by May, 1980 Mt. St. Helens had erupted many times, far more dramatically than anything we've seen here yet. -c |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message I would expect you to be both confused and just as contrary as usual. I can at least count on you to keep life from getting dull. In any event, there was no full-scale evacuation, nor did they predict an explosion at all. WRONG! If you're gonna belittle someone, CJ, you should present the facts straight: There was a very large RED ZONE evacuation before May 18 that people such as Harry Truman chose to ignore when they went up to encourage him to leave. Although hundreds of airplanes were reported flying in the evacuation zones, the FAA ?investigated only seven reports. What? There were "hundreds of airplanes in the evacuation zones" I thought you said there were no evactuations. In fact, if there were hundreds of airplanes there, perhaps you can tell us how many "Darwin Awards" were awarded to pilots blown out of the sky. -c |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john smith" wrote in message Let em go, CJ. They are Darwin Award candidates. Aren't we all? -c |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave S" wrote in message Lets hope they don't take anyone else WITH them during the qualifying trials for a DA You guys keep sucking that media hype right up. "Whoa, this is blahblahblah reporting. The mountain is DANGEROUS! STAY AWAY FROM THE MOUNTAIN! Let's go now to our live NewsCrew helicopter hovering over the crater...." Better send up a NOTAM to watch out for Rodan. It's erupting right now. But, guess what? Unless you're -right- in front of the crater, it's pretty obvious when it's venting. Know what you do then? Turn around and file a PIREP. I flew around it yesterday. Know what? I saw MORE STEAM COMING OUT OF THE LAVA DOME WHEN I HIKED IT LAST YEAR AND STARED DOWN AT IT FROM THE RIM than I did this yesterday. Mt. St Helens is binary. It's either erupting or its not. If it's erupting, stay away from it. If it's not, it's not. The only hazard is if it starts to erupt while you're downrange or you're dumb enough to fly into the eruption. -c |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() and then how the forest rebuilds itself and life goes on in a miraculously short time; then they tell you not to walk off the trail or pick up rocks because the ecosystem is fragile. That's actually not so crazy as it sounds. Remember, tourists have a big impact on an ecology, just because there are so many of them. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Teacherjh" wrote in message
... and then how the forest rebuilds itself and life goes on in a miraculously short time; then they tell you not to walk off the trail or pick up rocks because the ecosystem is fragile. That's actually not so crazy as it sounds. Remember, tourists have a big impact on an ecology, just because there are so many of them. And besides, the ecology never gets a chance to recover from the tourists. The eruption happens, wipes everything out, and then things can gradually come back. But to do so, they need to be left alone. Unlike the damage from the eruption, damage from tourists happens every day, and the ecology never gets a break. Reminds me of our visit to Death Valley, where we stopped to look at some salt pools, the edges of which teemed with very tiny microscopic life. Signs everywhere implored the tourists to stay on the path, and to not walk up to the pools, since a single step can wipe out millions of the creatures and render the area under the footprint sterile for years, maybe even decades. More tourists completely ignored the signs than made any attempt to comply with them. And yes, you could see the left-over footprints everywhere. ![]() Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Sure Check TPAS traffic proximity alert | Brian | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 21st 04 07:37 PM |
"We should have had orange or red-type of alert in June or Julyof 2001" | Jack | Military Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 09:34 PM |
Terror alert drops to yellow | C J Campbell | Piloting | 0 | January 9th 04 03:44 PM |
FBI Issues Alert Against Almanac Carriers | noname | Military Aviation | 1 | December 30th 03 01:13 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |