![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:00:29 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote: "Roger" wrote in message .. . No, that one is true. Kerry claims to be a hunter and pro gun rights, but his voting record is decidedly anti-gun. Again, you are oversimplifying the issue, labeling as "anti-gun" anyone who doesn't approve of carte-blanche access to guns. "False" was correct. Not at all. Kerry has a long and very consistent record of voting against pro firearms legislation and for needless restrictions, or outright banning. It is not me, but Kerry who has taken the carte-blanche stance. Check the voting record on firearms legislation. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please don't push your gun lobby on this newsgroup. I have been a strong
opponent of the TSA rule, but I do not see the parallels with gun control. Guns are designed to kill people. Airplanes are designed to transport people. I admit I don't know much about guns. But that discussion does not belong in this newsgroup unless there is a direct connection to aviation (such as guns in the cockpit etc..). "W P Dixon" wrote in : Well Tien, The Second Amendment was written in order to keep the government in check. The power of the people was meant to be stronger than the power of the federal government. Unfortunately "We The People" has become more like "We The Sheeple". Slowly law after law takes away the freedoms of the people. When you look at laws that are enacted that tell a homeowner that he can not paint his house certain colors it's pretty easy to see! If you don't you are going through life with blinders on. Australia and Great Britain have enacted severe gun control laws , and their crime rates have sky rocketed. Check out the numbers on numerous web sites...it's amazing! For myself I see a gun control law as just another step to do away with guns. Common Sense tells us all that someone who is a convicted felon should never be allowed to own a firearm, but how many people do we still let drive a car that drives DUI...just as dangerous wouldn't you think? I think a big part of all of the hoopla is that gun control people don't really understand guns period, or laws already written. I constantly hear talk of these gun shows selling guns to anybody . I go to these shows all the time and I have never bought even an old shotgun without the dealer calling a background check on me. But some politicians may like that does not happen..Which is just a blatent lie. So it makes me wonder exactly what these politicians are up to! The assault weapons ban was a joke! It banned guns because of the way they looked! My .22 cal rifle fits the operational category of these "oh so bad" weapons! It's just ridiculas! Also covered on this "ban" was high capacity magazines. Like it takes more than one bullet to kill someone? I find it amusing that the political party in this country that usually complains about police brutality seems to want to make themselves even more at the mercy of these same police. When only the police and the feds have guns , what do they think will keep these types in check then? No I am not saying all cops commit brutal acts, but there are those on the gun control side that think it happens more often than not in law enforcement.And yep there are in deed BAD COPS....how many bad cops will there be when no one can protect themselves from anything..crooks or anyone? And one simple fact remains...make all the laws you want and the crooks will still have them and get them . And it only effects law abidding citizens..who would then be at the mercy of these thugs. If they can not smuggle them in...which heck we all know you can do look at all the drugs that come into this country! , a gun is very simple to make. So the law only prevents a person from defending themselves. Case in point... The city of Kennesaw Mountain , GA passed a law that required anyone over the age of 21 (homeowner I believe) to own a handgun. The crime rate dropped by something of the 80% range. Again please look up the exact number. The town made this law because a town in Ohio I think it was banned guns.....there crime rate rose by about 80%. Every city in this country that has strict gun control laws has the worst crime rates. I for one will never depend on the police that usually show up 2 hours after a crime has taken place to defend my family. As far as police complaints well I would complain to, if I had a 9mm and the bad guys had AK-47's. and since no law is going to stop the bad guys from having an Ak-47 ...why shouldn't the police or someone who "has the right" to defend their family have equal firepower. And common sense will tell you that if you took every single gun out of a country, a murderer will still kill! Will we ban knives next... then frying pans and baseball bats? Where would it stop? Or would it just stop when the government knew the sheeple were at their mercy? No fiearms sure means no civilian uprising against a tyrant. It sure all debateable for sure, I think the entire process needs people to see from both viewpoints not just one side. Gun Control for me would be a background check, must be 18 to own or carry a firearm, and a convicted felon has no right to a firearm or a vote( those rights should be lost at conviction). Other than that..you can take my guns when you pry my dead cold fingers off of them. hee hee hee Patrick "TD" wrote in message m... Roger wrote in message Bush's fundamentalism, Born again Christian stance scares me Scares me too. as does Kerry's anti-gun, ...stance. Roger, this confuses me, and many others I am sure both in the US and especially outside. Why do many americans view anti-gun laws as frightening? Coming from a place where we have significant gun control mechanisms, which in my layman`s view, seems to "work" controlling violent crime, why would you favor upholding the 2nd ammendment instead of supporting gun control, which many if not all law enforcement agencies recommend strengthening? Tien Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message . 4... Please don't push your gun lobby on this newsgroup. I have been a strong opponent of the TSA rule, but I do not see the parallels with gun control. Guns are designed to kill people. Airplanes are designed to transport people. I admit I don't know much about guns. But that discussion does not belong in this newsgroup unless there is a direct connection to aviation (such as guns in the cockpit etc..). So who appointed you moderator? Please learn quickly, the following lesson. This group is more a cyber-hanger, with discussions from guns, to religion, to politics, to old flying stories, and every once in a while, we talk about flying planes. The ONLY way to deal with it, is to not deal with it. Skip topics you do not like, but this is a free group. I don't always like the subject, but then, I skip it, or skim it. It took a while (I am a slow learner) to figure this all out. Mentioning this again, or arguing about it now will not earn you any friends, and will result in you betting "plonked" by many people. In a friendly way, yours; -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 10/22/2004 |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message . 4... Please don't push your gun lobby on this newsgroup. I have been a strong opponent of the TSA rule, but I do not see the parallels with gun control. Guns are designed to kill people. Airplanes are designed to transport people. I admit I don't know much about guns. But that discussion does not belong in this newsgroup unless there is a direct connection to aviation (such as guns in the cockpit etc..). I bet he owns a Remington Wingmaster so buzz off. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Michael wrote:
Now if I were an alien looking to get flight training, I would be pretty unhappy - since these rulings are going to make most of the opposition to the rule disappear. Right now, if I was starting from scratch I would no longer even consider the US for flight training. I'd go to Canada during the summertime. With all the TSA fees plus now you'd be forced to go to only certain certificate mill schools due to visa restrictions, and you'd have to deal with the US embassy to get a visa (which is a royal pain in the arse), it would actually be cheaper to learn to fly in the south of France, where the weather is at least reliable. Never thought I'd see the day where aviation is more free in the EU than it is in the US, but it's happening. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best airport to land at for Vancouver | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 2 | June 11th 04 04:27 AM |
Where CAN you land your plane?? | ET | Piloting | 28 | February 27th 04 10:29 PM |
Can the F-14 carry six AIM-54s and land on carrier? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 1 | October 29th 03 08:14 PM |
Sharon's plan-Steal more land | Grantland | Military Aviation | 0 | October 15th 03 07:24 PM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |