![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I am reading FAR 91.205 (d) (2) correctly, you only need one COMM radio
and one navigation radio (of some type) for IFR operation. If this is correct, how do you stay in contact with ATC while picking up ATIS, etc? Are you allowed to request a frequency change, then come back to ATC? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes. Common even when you have 2 radios.
A good trick when radio traffic is heavy is to look at the approach control freq on the plate. When a controller hands you off to that frequency, go grab the ATIS and then check-in with approach on the new freq. They're not expecting your call right away and this way you don't have to try to pick the atis out in between all the calls on approach control. -cwk. "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... If I am reading FAR 91.205 (d) (2) correctly, you only need one COMM radio and one navigation radio (of some type) for IFR operation. If this is correct, how do you stay in contact with ATC while picking up ATIS, etc? Are you allowed to request a frequency change, then come back to ATC? Thanks! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah, I like that technique. Gotta try that next time.
Better than my technique I used last weekend: Turn down volume on Comm1 to listen to ATIS on Comm2, then forget to turn up volume on Comm1 again. Makes for a fun conversation when you finally turn up the volume again... "C Kingsbury" wrote in message hlink.net... Yes. Common even when you have 2 radios. A good trick when radio traffic is heavy is to look at the approach control freq on the plate. When a controller hands you off to that frequency, go grab the ATIS and then check-in with approach on the new freq. They're not expecting your call right away and this way you don't have to try to pick the atis out in between all the calls on approach control. -cwk. "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... If I am reading FAR 91.205 (d) (2) correctly, you only need one COMM radio and one navigation radio (of some type) for IFR operation. If this is correct, how do you stay in contact with ATC while picking up ATIS, etc? Are you allowed to request a frequency change, then come back to ATC? Thanks! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Denton" wrote in message
... If I am reading FAR 91.205 (d) (2) correctly, you only need one COMM radio and one navigation radio (of some type) for IFR operation. If this is correct, how do you stay in contact with ATC while picking up ATIS, etc? Are you allowed to request a frequency change, then come back to ATC? As "cwk" says, that's a very common technique. I'll just add that the reason why it's still used by those with two radios is that it can be quite challenging to maintain radio conversations on two frequencies, especially if things are busy but even when they are not. You don't want to be hassled with having to understand and respond to ATC while you're trying to deal with something else. The ATIS is sort of a special case, since you can usually sneak out the needed information little by little, even while monitoring and responding to the ATC frequency (and of course sometimes, though certainly not all times, you'll have the opportunity to catch the ATIS during a handoff as "cwk" says). For other stuff, like filing PIREPs, getting updated weather, modifying VFR flight plans, contacting an FBO, whatever, you really want to be able to focus on one conversation at a time. Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
neat trick.. until you have to wait 2 minutes to get through the entire ATIS
tape to get back to the beginning for something you missed.. BT "C Kingsbury" wrote in message hlink.net... Yes. Common even when you have 2 radios. A good trick when radio traffic is heavy is to look at the approach control freq on the plate. When a controller hands you off to that frequency, go grab the ATIS and then check-in with approach on the new freq. They're not expecting your call right away and this way you don't have to try to pick the atis out in between all the calls on approach control. -cwk. "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... If I am reading FAR 91.205 (d) (2) correctly, you only need one COMM radio and one navigation radio (of some type) for IFR operation. If this is correct, how do you stay in contact with ATC while picking up ATIS, etc? Are you allowed to request a frequency change, then come back to ATC? Thanks! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BTIZ" wrote in message
news ![]() neat trick.. until you have to wait 2 minutes to get through the entire ATIS tape to get back to the beginning for something you missed.. ATC is not going to care if you take 2 minutes to complete a handoff. Even if you did run into an ATIS that took that long to copy (which would be very rare). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Try putting COMM2 (ATIS) on the cabin speaker instead of the intercom.
This is what the KX-155A does. Steven Barnes wrote: Ah, I like that technique. Gotta try that next time. Better than my technique I used last weekend: Turn down volume on Comm1 to listen to ATIS on Comm2, then forget to turn up volume on Comm1 again. Makes for a fun conversation when you finally turn up the volume again... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Denton wrote:
Are you allowed to request a frequency change, then come back to ATC? Yes. As a matter of fact, unless you have two pilots and radios set up to allow them to be used independently, it's probably a good idea to do that anyhow. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Denton" wrote in message
... If I am reading FAR 91.205 (d) (2) correctly, you only need one COMM radio and one navigation radio (of some type) for IFR operation. Technically, you might not need even one comm or nav radio. You only need whatever radio equipment your particular flight depends on. If you're in Class G airspace, you don't need to talk to ATC, and you might be able to navigate adequately without radio instruments. (I don't know if such flights occur much. I've never made one, but I'm in the Northeast, where there isn't much uncontrolled airspace.) --Gary |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho ) wrote:
ATC is not going to care if you take 2 minutes to complete a handoff. Maybe this is yet another locality difference? In the Northeast US airspace, I recall at least two incidents receiving a hand-off, tuning the frequency, and having to wait about a minute to check in due to frequency congestion. Before I was able to make the call, the controller suddenly called me: "Bonanza xxx, are you on yet?" In both cases, I remember acknowledging the call and immediately receiving either an altitude change or a vector for traffic. Now, had I not been on the frequency, would this have been a problem? Probably not, because I am sure the controller had other options, but it seemed to make the controller's work slightly easier that I was there. In a one-radio scenario, I would prefer an immediate frequency switch, then include a request for frequency change with the check-in rather than take time between switching frequencies to receive the ATIS. -- Peter |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
Equipment List Required Documentation | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 9 | April 21st 04 02:57 AM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
TKM radios | Peter Gottlieb | Piloting | 5 | August 15th 03 02:44 PM |