![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Typical chopper take off from a confined area is straight up vertically
until clear of the obstacles, then a horizontal acceleration to about 50 knots, then a climb out at 50-70 knots. Sounds like the chopper took off and accelerated over the Wal Mart. The low, horizontal part is what looked scary to you. Normally we avoid take offs like that for just that reason. So, there would have to be a reason the chopper took off directly over the Wal Mart if there was vacant land on three sides of the construction site. If it was really windy that day, from the direction of the Wal Mart, the pilot may have decided all things considered that it was safer to depart in that direction. Downwind take offs are considered dangerous. Or there might have been wires or other obstacles in the other directions. What I would do is call the helicopter operation over at Addison, email the owner the picture, and ask them if they know anything about it. They are the only really active Schweizer operation around the Dallas area. wrote in message ups.com... "It is well above 70', probably closer to 400-500' AGL. Is there an airport or hospital nearby?" The nearest hospital in the direction from which the helicopter came is several miles away. I don't know of any airport in that direction. I had the impression that the helicopter took off from the construction site across the street, about 500 feet away, though I did not see it actually take off. The construction is building a road through a vacant field. In fact, most of the land in that direction for several miles is farmland or vacant fields. The Wal-Mart in the photo is near the intersection of Ohio Street and 121 in Plano, Texas. It should not be difficult to find that on a map. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam O'Nella" wrote in message ... "Also, I take my pda / phone / camera in there all the time. " I have worn my Olympus C-3040s around my neck for the last 4 years The difference is mine is in my pocket. (and had another camera on my hip for a year prior). I try to have it with me at all times. I've taken it into several Wal-Marts in several cities in two states. I have never before had a Wal-Mart representative tell me that I cannot bring my camera inside the store. Now, though, they tell me I can't shop there if I have my camera. Well, now you know. No more wearing the camera in the store. They do that because they don't want other companies taking photos of products placement, pricing, etc. Always been that way far as I have ever heard. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Judah" wrote in message . .. You paid $600 for a camera that takes longer to boot up than Windows and even longer to process a picture? You could have gotten one like that for about $150 from... Walmart! Take a look at the EXIF information for this picture. The Olympus 3040Zoom used to take this picture was introduced in April 2001. Street price at that time was $800, so he probably got it used or on clearance when it was discontinued. It was slow starting even for its day due to the lens design, but otherwise a fairly decent camera. Modern digitals don't take nearly as long to boot up. Instant on is the standard now. Pooua came into a piloting forum looking for sympathy. First he was frightened by a helicopter that was simply minding its own business, then traumatized by a Wal-Mart manager. I mean, this all happened on December 17, and he is still upset. Sounds like his expectations were a little misplaced all around. Listen, Pooua, we pilots are a little weary of being accused of being terrorists by ignorant, panicky twits like you. Now, people here have all told you where you were wrong and why you were wrong, but you insist on arguing with them. Believe it or not, the folks here actually have some idea of what they are talking about. We also know that you do not. If you want some sympathy, take it to alt.airporthaters or someplace like that. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "William W. Plummer" wrote in message ... Matt Barrow wrote: "William W. Plummer" wrote in message ... Helos are used to police major power lines in my area. My guess is they are less than 50 feet above the lines. Everytime I see them fly by I just give thanks that I don't have that job. Like these? http://mdhelicopters.com/gallery/MD5...0_SCE_0012.jpg http://mdhelicopters.com/gallery/MD5...0_SCE_0007.jpg http://mdhelicopters.com/gallery/MD5...0_SCE_0087.jpg Great pix! I got a charge out of them. Oh...how cliché!! |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Barrow wrote:
"William W. Plummer" wrote in message ... Matt Barrow wrote: "William W. Plummer" wrote in message ... Helos are used to police major power lines in my area. My guess is they are less than 50 feet above the lines. Everytime I see them fly by I just give thanks that I don't have that job. Like these? http://mdhelicopters.com/gallery/MD5...0_SCE_0012.jpg http://mdhelicopters.com/gallery/MD5...0_SCE_0007.jpg http://mdhelicopters.com/gallery/MD5...0_SCE_0087.jpg Great pix! I got a charge out of them. Oh...how cliché!! Bell Ads showing chopper with in 2 or 3 feet of lines http://makeashorterlink.com/?K1A42526A |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan,
I didn't say there weren't places that it was doen or even that it was not a good idea. I was just implying that it was not in the regs. "Dan Thompson" wrote in message om... I have a helicopter rating too. At an uncontrolled airport, the fixed wingers fly left pattern, pattern altitude 1000' - we helis fly right pattern, pattern altitude 500', usually land on the ramp or taxiway. "Gig Giacona" wrote in message ... Which one are you quoting? I have a helicopter rating and I am absolutly sure neither of the CFIs or the examiner ever mentioned a thing about it and you would think the exaimner might mention it when I entered the pattern on the wrong side of the airport. They are picky that way. "Denny" wrote in message oups.com... Dan, you are dealing with the FAR's... I'm not guessing, I'm quoting them Have a good un... Denny |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
I believe the helicopter was within 100 feet of me when I took the photo. It looks small, so you might think it is farther away. As a former armature photographer (used to have my own darkroom and all) I offer the following: The stock lens on that Cheap Olympus camera doesn't distort perspective unless you are using the zoom function. The chopper is roughly the same apparent size as the red truck seen waaaaay at the end of the parking lot - approximately 500 to 700 feet away horizontally. My trained eye places the chopper between 100 to 200 feet closer to you than the red truck - 400 to 600 feet away. It's vertical height, then, is approximately 300 to 400 feet. If the chopper were in a rapid ascent as you claim, it was many hundreds of feet above Wal-Mart as it flew over. Therefore, I am sorry to say that you are simply nutso and possibly delusional. -- Jim Fisher |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Fisher" wrote in message .. . wrote in message Therefore, I am sorry to say that you are simply nutso and possibly delusional. Too late, Jim. I think the troll became discouraged at the extraordinary lack of sympathy for his sensitive feelings here and has gone away. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, there would have to be a reason the chopper took off directly
over the Wal Mart if there was vacant land on three sides of the construction site. Or there might have been wires or other obstacles in the other directions. I don't recall that day being very windy, but there are electrical lines on all the other sides of the property. The pilot was travelling along the line of greatest distance to an obstacle (other than the Wal-Mart building). What I would do is call the helicopter operation over at Addison, email the owner the picture, and ask them if they know anything about it. They are the only really active Schweizer operation around the Dallas area. That was a good idea. I just got off the phone with one of the managers at Summit Helicopters in Addison. He confirmed that is one of his company's helicopters, and they have frequent operations in the area, and they are the only operation in the area that flies the Schweizer 300 helicopter. He said that whichever of us bet closest to a height of 125 feet probably won. He also said it was a good picture (I sent him a full-sized, 2 Meg copy). He seemed like a really nice man. Maybe I'll take a helicopter flight with them, sometime ($99 for a half-hour, and they offer Christmas lights tours). |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... That was a good idea. I just got off the phone with one of the managers at Summit Helicopters in Addison. He confirmed that is one of his company's helicopters, and they have frequent operations in the area, and they are the only operation in the area that flies the Schweizer 300 helicopter. He said that whichever of us bet closest to a height of 125 feet probably won. I said it was 150 feet. What do I win? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 05:24 AM |
Dennis Fetters Mini 500 | EmailMe | Home Built | 70 | June 21st 04 09:36 PM |
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 6 | February 27th 04 09:11 AM |
Helicopter crash video | James Blakely | Piloting | 17 | December 30th 03 03:21 PM |
After 23 years, Marines get last Super Stallion CH-53E helicopter | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 25th 03 10:04 PM |