![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My earlier impression was that A Century of Flight wan't much better than
FS2K2. Now that I've used it for much of the afternoon, I changed my opinion. It looks and runs better than my FS2K2. The only problem ( flaw ) is the color of the water textures. They are far too light for reality. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with your comments. The lakes around my area (North Georgia) have
changed from a realistic color in FS2K2 to looking more like those of the Caribbean in FS2K4. I tried to use the highest quality display settings and with a 1.8 GHz P4 and a GeForce 4 Ti4600 128MB I was only getting frame rates in the middle single digits. I have found the highest medium settings to work the best with my system. I have transferred several aircraft from FS2002 and all have worked well. I have had no problems with the heavies from Project Open Sky. I have to work around moving the 737-400 folder with six different versions and maintain the new interactive virtual cockpit of the new 737-400. The weather is so much better than previous versions, and is better than that found in the FLY II series. ATC is much better and as a whole is better for practicing instrument approaches. Practicing with flight simulator makes things easier when getting into the "real" airplane. I have used both the Sidewinder Force Feedback 2 and the CH Products Yoke and Pedals with FS2K4 and all work well and the same as FS2K2. I have tried a few of the new planes and I really like the DC-3 even though I have several freeware versions, this one is much better. So overall, I am happy with FS 2004 and I think it continues to move the series in the right direction and is not a step backward as FS 2000 was in some ways. I wonder what system I will need to run the simulator with all settings maxxed??? "M" wrote in message ... My earlier impression was that A Century of Flight wan't much better than FS2K2. Now that I've used it for much of the afternoon, I changed my opinion. It looks and runs better than my FS2K2. The only problem ( flaw ) is the color of the water textures. They are far too light for reality. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|