![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kinda like tow signals...there are a lot of pilots
making a lot of assumptions. I have a lot of gliders come join me close in a thermal WITHOUT my agreement. There's some assuming going on there... I'd say the number one rule is get the agreement with the other pilot. In that conversation or prearrangement, one can be as specific or general as the pilots want. There are volumes on formation flying (at least for power) and pilots who fly formation with absolutely no training or research are missing some excellent lessons learned by others...and accepting a somewhat higher level of risk... From my limited formation training, I learned enough to choose, at my low skill level, to generally avoid it. There were enough nuances and dangers, and my time was too limited to do it right and remain very proficient, that I choose very loose trail formations, clear exit agreement, and day VFR CAVU with an experienced leader, or nothing at all. Towing near clouds or dual flights with low vis and cropdusters nearby have, in my past, made me uncomfortable enough to release, land, and call it a day... Close gliders I don't know have backed me away, and even my buddies forming up get "no thanks" most of the time... In article , TOM RENT wrote: I'm sure almost every RAS reader has read every word of Paul's account because we all have been in the same situation numerous times and could see the same thing happen to us at any moment. I have a lot of soaring books but it is interesting that little is written or formally taught about this aspect of soaring. Outside of the basic rule of gaggle flying in the same direction as others, I think we need a stamdard protocol for any proximity or formation flying which we all rouinely do. Outside of stall/spin in the pattern, mid-airs during proximit/formation flying (including gaggles) is likely the next most dangerous situation we activily place ourselves in. 1. What is the safest way to enter a gaggle, and what are the most unsafe ways? 2. If you lose sight of another glider that you are gaggling with, should you keep thermalling or head away? (assume no radio available) 3. What is the safest way to exit a gaggle, and what are the most unsafe ways? 4. Pair flying - best practices and worst practices ....? Let's express our best ideas here and perhaps this too will save lives. I do know that these recent events have caused members of our local club to immediately begin studying our local methods and habits, which I think this activity will result in some pretty healthy positive changes. -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Trevor Nash wrote:
One more thought about Mid Air Collisions. Next time you are belting along under a cloud street at 90 - 100 Knots plus. How far away will the other glider be, doing the same thing in the opposite direction, when you see it, and how long have you got to make the right decision with a closing speed of 200 knots!!!!!!! I t looked like about a quarter mile. But we were each only doing 80-85kts. Maybe 100 yds closest approach. Something to keep in mid while flying in mountains (this was just north of Salida, CO), white gliders with clouds, mountains, and snow behind them are really wearing camouflage. Shawn Been there done that. Not my idea of fun. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see that Europeons use a lot of anti-collision markings on
their sailplanes. I don't know if it's a requirement over there but it seems like a good idea. Is there a reason why U.S. glider owners resist this trend. Thanks, __Mike Ziaskas |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the in-depth response. This could very well be helpful to
the rest of us who hope to never be in a similar situation. BTW: it is customary to buy that repacker a bottle/case of his favorite drink. Tom |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In some recent testing by the BGA it appears that, if anything, anti
collision marking may actually make aircraft less easily noticable. Most of the midairs that we have seen recently have been between sailplanes that knew there was another aircraft in close proximity before the collision happened and in several cases have been between sailplanes actively involved in 'cooperative flying'. When two 'non-cooperative' pilots happen to end up sharing a thermal they tend to do so with a very high degree of caution about each others actions. When cooperative flying gets going it appears to me that a degree of familiarity or complacency creeps in. It appears to me that the guidance emerging here seems to be 'assume nothing, if you loose sight of the aircraft you know to be close by, talk quickly to clarify the sitation whilst increasing your seperation safely'. Perhaps safe cooperative flying does need a much higher level of communication. Perhaps pilots flying cooperatively should carrry FRS radios to allow them to chatter continuously. As one poster has already noted, cooperative flying is a form of advanced formation flying with continuous formation breaks and reformates and without much of a plan. In that situation you have to know what you are up to, what the other pilot is doing and the actions to take when the script gets lost! I remember a talk given by a member of a top formation aerobatics display team in which he said that once an aircraft in the formation was not where it was expected to be, when it was supposed to be there, the only option was to break away and resync the whole operation. I have witnessed 2 mid-airs, thankfully with only one fatality amongst my fellow pilots. Both were in non-cooperative flying. Both could possibly have been avoided by better observation. Ian |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Already in the works... He likes single malt Scotch which runs about $60 a
bottle here, small price to pay, though. Paul "Tom Seim" wrote in message om... Thanks for the in-depth response. This could very well be helpful to the rest of us who hope to never be in a similar situation. BTW: it is customary to buy that repacker a bottle/case of his favorite drink. Tom |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Other gliders joining your thermal is quite normal, and I wouldn't ask you
for permission... -- Bert Willing ASW20 "TW" "Mark James Boyd" a écrit dans le message de news:40800ea2$1@darkstar... Kinda like tow signals...there are a lot of pilots making a lot of assumptions. I have a lot of gliders come join me close in a thermal WITHOUT my agreement. There's some assuming going on there... I'd say the number one rule is get the agreement with the other pilot. In that conversation or prearrangement, one can be as specific or general as the pilots want. There are volumes on formation flying (at least for power) and pilots who fly formation with absolutely no training or research are missing some excellent lessons learned by others...and accepting a somewhat higher level of risk... From my limited formation training, I learned enough to choose, at my low skill level, to generally avoid it. There were enough nuances and dangers, and my time was too limited to do it right and remain very proficient, that I choose very loose trail formations, clear exit agreement, and day VFR CAVU with an experienced leader, or nothing at all. Towing near clouds or dual flights with low vis and cropdusters nearby have, in my past, made me uncomfortable enough to release, land, and call it a day... Close gliders I don't know have backed me away, and even my buddies forming up get "no thanks" most of the time... In article , TOM RENT wrote: I'm sure almost every RAS reader has read every word of Paul's account because we all have been in the same situation numerous times and could see the same thing happen to us at any moment. I have a lot of soaring books but it is interesting that little is written or formally taught about this aspect of soaring. Outside of the basic rule of gaggle flying in the same direction as others, I think we need a stamdard protocol for any proximity or formation flying which we all rouinely do. Outside of stall/spin in the pattern, mid-airs during proximit/formation flying (including gaggles) is likely the next most dangerous situation we activily place ourselves in. 1. What is the safest way to enter a gaggle, and what are the most unsafe ways? 2. If you lose sight of another glider that you are gaggling with, should you keep thermalling or head away? (assume no radio available) 3. What is the safest way to exit a gaggle, and what are the most unsafe ways? 4. Pair flying - best practices and worst practices ....? Let's express our best ideas here and perhaps this too will save lives. I do know that these recent events have caused members of our local club to immediately begin studying our local methods and habits, which I think this activity will result in some pretty healthy positive changes. -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Distance Task Opinions? | Kilo Charlie | Soaring | 14 | September 6th 03 04:23 AM |