![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is the scoop. I spoke with my medical flight examiner some time
ago about the use of medications that treat bi-polar syndrome and taking them while operating an aircraft or glider. He was not 100% sure on the ruling even though it is stated on the FAA's medical pages that those drugs used to treat bi-polar syndrome are not allowed. He then in turn contacted someone in OK city with the FAA and they told him and I quote "If the person is on medications that are banned by the FAA, they need to ground themselves for 30 days before flying". The doctor then asked "What about flying gliders". The lady in OK City said that "it did not matter what they were flying as you are not allowed to operate an aircraft while taking medications banned by the FAA". If you want to fly and think this is a load of crap, contact your local FAA medical examiner and ask them. I really hope that the people on this page who say it is alright to take these medications and operate an aircraft as PIC don't live in the United States. If you do, and you make a mistake, you could screw everything up for everyone else. Get the facts from the horses mouth which happens to be the FAA or better yet, if you are in the United States and are a member of AOPA, contact their legal office and ask them. (DL152279546231) wrote in message ... By the way my Psychiatrist is a pilot and feels I am safe to fly provided I take my medicines daily and I do... But, I do need some clarification. A medical certificate is not required for soaring is what I have been told reguardless of medications or illness provided the pilot feels he can fly safely. I have never heard of a list of medications which bar a pilot from flying gliders... However I have done some research and read the FAA won't even issue a medical to an applicant on unipolar depression so I did not plan to apply to face certain rejection Also, however, I am wondering if these psychotropic medications don't cause problems with heatstroke and dehydration I was hoping maybe an annonymous person would step forward and say they were flying and it was not a problem Lithium, Effexor, and Zyprexa are the ones I have taken for over two years Also, by the way, my Pyschiatrist said getting back into flying would be an excellent anti-depressant |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B. Iten wrote:
Here is the scoop. I spoke with my medical flight examiner some time ago about the use of medications that treat bi-polar syndrome and taking them while operating an aircraft or glider. He was not 100% sure on the ruling even though it is stated on the FAA's medical pages that those drugs used to treat bi-polar syndrome are not allowed. Brian, I am having trouble finding this FAA list of banned medications. Could you point me to it? A URL or specific section in the FAR would help. Thanks. -Doug |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Doug, You're having trouble finding the FAA medication list, because it doesn't exist. Various groups, such as AOPA and Virtual Flight Surgeon's at http://www.aviationmedicine.com , have UNOFFICIAL lists of approved and disapproved medications, but they are swags which don't bear the approval of the FAA. All such unofficial lists contain errors, because the FAA policies are in such a constant state of re-review. The FAA won't publish such a list because their internal, secret, but official list changes so frequently (new drugs to either be approved or banned; old previously approved drugs with newly found side effects, which are now banned; etc). Groups trying to publish such lists do so by submitting a waiver request for, say, Zestril (a blood pressure medication). When it comes back approved, they put zestril on the list. Then they submit someone for depression with, say, Zoloft. It comes back disapproved, and they put Zoloft on the no-go list. Over time, a rough approximation of FAA medication policy is built up, but it is never 100% accurate. Hope this clears things up. Bullwinkle On 6/12/04 3:24 AM, in article , "Doug Hoffman" wrote: B. Iten wrote: Here is the scoop. I spoke with my medical flight examiner some time ago about the use of medications that treat bi-polar syndrome and taking them while operating an aircraft or glider. He was not 100% sure on the ruling even though it is stated on the FAA's medical pages that those drugs used to treat bi-polar syndrome are not allowed. Brian, I am having trouble finding this FAA list of banned medications. Could you point me to it? A URL or specific section in the FAR would help. Thanks. -Doug |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DL152279546231" wrote in message ... The controlling and ONLY FAR you need to consider medically while flying gliders is 14 CFR 61.53(b). Allan So now I am still confused. Do I read this FAR to say if you know you have a medical condition but don't think it will interfere with your flying, fly. OR, if you have a medical condition which would make you ineligible for a medical certificate you cannot fly even in an operation not requiring a medical certificate... You should be seeing a huge grey area, perhaps one big enough to fly a glider through, perhaps not. I flew gliders for years whilst taking a "banned" medication. IMHO I did so legally and safely because research told me that the FAA was waivering that drug and that condition as long as certain medical tests were done; tests that I had already done more than once. My doctor and I were in agreement that it was OK for me to fly. Furthermore, it would have been difficult for the FAA (or an insurance company) to say I was violating 61.53(b) when the FAA was routinely granting waivers for exactly that same condition. Later, this was all verified when I decided to fly SEL and actually went through the bureaucratic hocus-pocus to get the waiver and the medical. Are they waivering your condition and your medications? I don't know, but I'll bet that AOPA could help you find out. If the FAA is absolutely not waivering anybody with your condition and/or anybody taking the drugs you take, I have to reluctantly say that it is probably best for you to keep your feet on the ground. Vaughn (b) Operations that do not require a medical certificate. For operations provided for in §61.23(b) of this part, a person shall not act as pilot in command, or in any other capacity as a required pilot flight crewmember, while that person knows or has reason to know of any medical condition that would make the person unable to operate the aircraft in a safe manner. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. Yes, that does help a great deal. And I'm not at all surprised
that this whole topic is a very grey area (that topic being piloting gliders and medical conditions and medications and so forth). My work involves dealing with US and state government regulations in a totally different discipline (motor vehicle emissions), but my experience there has also been the government regs are often very unclear and subject to a great deal of interpretation. Off this topic but sort of related: I know this is stating the obvious, but I'll do it anyway. Even if someone has no illness and is taking no medications, it could very well be that at some given times they are not "fit to fly". Reasons include mental duress due to work or personal reasons, lack of sleep, and so forth. I'll not get into the old age issue as I believe that has been adequately covered on r.a.s. before. Thanks again. -Doug Bullwinkle wrote: Doug, You're having trouble finding the FAA medication list, because it doesn't exist. Various groups, such as AOPA and Virtual Flight Surgeon's at http://www.aviationmedicine.com , have UNOFFICIAL lists of approved and disapproved medications, but they are swags which don't bear the approval of the FAA. All such unofficial lists contain errors, because the FAA policies are in such a constant state of re-review. The FAA won't publish such a list because their internal, secret, but official list changes so frequently (new drugs to either be approved or banned; old previously approved drugs with newly found side effects, which are now banned; etc). Groups trying to publish such lists do so by submitting a waiver request for, say, Zestril (a blood pressure medication). When it comes back approved, they put zestril on the list. Then they submit someone for depression with, say, Zoloft. It comes back disapproved, and they put Zoloft on the no-go list. Over time, a rough approximation of FAA medication policy is built up, but it is never 100% accurate. Hope this clears things up. Bullwinkle On 6/12/04 3:24 AM, in article , "Doug Hoffman" wrote: B. Iten wrote: Here is the scoop. I spoke with my medical flight examiner some time ago about the use of medications that treat bi-polar syndrome and taking them while operating an aircraft or glider. He was not 100% sure on the ruling even though it is stated on the FAA's medical pages that those drugs used to treat bi-polar syndrome are not allowed. Brian, I am having trouble finding this FAA list of banned medications. Could you point me to it? A URL or specific section in the FAR would help. Thanks. -Doug |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The fact that US glider pilots don't need a medical certificate
doesn't seem to alter the applicability of the FAA drugs list. Ref 61.53 and 91.17. You can drive whilst using all the medications the OP mentioned, if you judge that they do not make you feel dizzy or drowsy. I can see why the barriers are set higher for powered aircraft than for drivers - I'm not sure that it follows that they should be set equally high for glider pilots. For example, gliders tend to fly further from major airports and over less populated terrain. In contrast it's pretty easy to take out 5 people if you mess up whilst driving. Just speculating - I don't suppose it makes any difference in the eyes of the law. vne |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Still it seems a group such as the SSA would have had to have run into the
question so often from power pilots having been denied medicals FAA would have had to give an answer. Started a new thread on the topic by the way to broaden the question to any drug/condition |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DL152279546231" wrote in message ... Still it seems a group such as the SSA would have had to have run into the question so often from power pilots having been denied medicals FAA would have had to give an answer. Started a new thread on the topic by the way to broaden the question to any drug/condition I have asked this question of senior AME's and the answer is that there is no difference in medical standards, just in the means of certifying those standards are met. A glider pilot may "self-certify" but a power pilot needs an AME to do the certification. If a pilot knows or has reason to know that a condition exists that would prevent the issuance of a 3rd class medical then self-certification is not an option. We glider pilots have a major privilege in self-certification. It is not too much of a reach to say that if the privilege is abused, we may lose it. Bill Daniels |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If you are suggesting that a glider pilot, in order to fly, must "self certify" that he or she meets the requirements of a class III physical, it may be the dumbest thing that I've ever heard. Even dumber than doing spin training at 800 ft AGL. (Which now seems to have been rescinded, thank goodness.) Note that I am not saying that you are dumb, merely that you are saying dumb things. The guiding regulation is 14 CFR 61.53(b) and yes, 91.17 applies. Your AME is incorrect; you do not have to "self certify" anything, you merely must abide by 61.53(b). If you were required to meet the medical rules of a Class III physical, the FARs would say so. That means that, if you have a cold and can't clear your ears, you shouldn't fly. If you have cut your hand and are unable to handle the controls, you shouldn't fly. If you have multiple personality disorder and your personality of the day is suicidal, you shouldn't fly. Note how 61.53(b) differs substantially from 61.53(a). It differs for a reason you, the pilot, make the determination that you are fit to fly, not your AME, not the FAA and, thankfully, not those of you who choose to rewrite the regulations to conform to whatever predjudice you have at the moment. The CARs, FARs and now CFRs were conceived of as being permissive, that is, if it is not expressly forbidden, it is presumed to be OK to do. If you have a rating and/or pilot license of any kind, it is presumed that you intend not to kill yourself or others. So be careful out there, don't go rewriting the regulations and don't give the FAA any reason to reexamine the regulations as they stand. Allan "I have asked this question of senior AME's and the answer is that there is no difference in medical standards, just in the means of certifying those standards are met. A glider pilot may "self-certify" but a power pilot needs an AME to do the certification. If a pilot knows or has reason to know that a condition exists that would prevent the issuance of a 3rd class medical then self-certification is not an option. We glider pilots have a major privilege in self-certification. It is not too much of a reach to say that if the privilege is abused, we may lose it." Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|