![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe the LS-6 does it that way (flaps and ailerons all even in full
negative flap position) my recollection of the 20 is that everything is even at zero flap and zero stick. One can set it up as one wishes, but one may be dialing in undesired consequences. I remember the Boeing engineer who told me, "Aircraft are designed by geniuses to be operated by idiots". JJ Sinclair |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On the 20, everything is flush in the full negative position.
-- Bert Willing ASW20 "TW" "JJ Sinclair" a écrit dans le message de ... I believe the LS-6 does it that way (flaps and ailerons all even in full negative flap position) my recollection of the 20 is that everything is even at zero flap and zero stick. One can set it up as one wishes, but one may be dialing in undesired consequences. I remember the Boeing engineer who told me, "Aircraft are designed by geniuses to be operated by idiots". JJ Sinclair |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On the ASW 20 I used to own a share in (German, early
model), everything was flush in the neutral (flap 3) position, I've seen a lot of 20's and I do not recall seeing any where the flaps lined up with the wing root in full negative. Oh, and to get back on topic, the spin characteristics were quite benign with a forward CofG but it wouldn't climb very well at all. Andrew Warbrick LS6C 17.5 (everything is flush in full negative on this) At 14:42 06 July 2004, Bert Willing wrote: On the 20, everything is flush in the full negative position. -- Bert Willing ASW20 'TW' 'JJ Sinclair' a écrit dans le message de ... I believe the LS-6 does it that way (flaps and ailerons all even in full negative flap position) my recollection of the 20 is that everything is even at zero flap and zero stick. One can set it up as one wishes, but one may be dialing in undesired consequences. I remember the Boeing engineer who told me, 'Aircraft are designed by geniuses to be operated by idiots'. JJ Sinclair |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flaps & ailerons are flush in full negative, but not the wing fairing. Well,
at least on mine. -- Bert Willing ASW20 "TW" "Andrew Warbrick" a écrit dans le message de ... On the ASW 20 I used to own a share in (German, early model), everything was flush in the neutral (flap 3) position, I've seen a lot of 20's and I do not recall seeing any where the flaps lined up with the wing root in full negative. Oh, and to get back on topic, the spin characteristics were quite benign with a forward CofG but it wouldn't climb very well at all. Andrew Warbrick LS6C 17.5 (everything is flush in full negative on this) At 14:42 06 July 2004, Bert Willing wrote: On the 20, everything is flush in the full negative position. -- Bert Willing ASW20 'TW' 'JJ Sinclair' a écrit dans le message de ... I believe the LS-6 does it that way (flaps and ailerons all even in full negative flap position) my recollection of the 20 is that everything is even at zero flap and zero stick. One can set it up as one wishes, but one may be dialing in undesired consequences. I remember the Boeing engineer who told me, 'Aircraft are designed by geniuses to be operated by idiots'. JJ Sinclair |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Bert,
Lined up with the wing fairings is what I meant by flush. It's been three years since I had the 20 but I do remember the flaps lined up with the ailerons in neutral (and this was adjustable by slackening the lock nuts and screwing the L'Hotelier's in and out). I can't accurately recollect whether the flap mixer moves the flaps more than the ailerons or by the same amount (though I know the flap mixer mechanism is not the same in the French 20s and might be different in the 20b and 20c). In the LS6 the flaperons are flush with the wing root in full negative but the 'flaps' are always in line with the 'ailerons' because they are locked together and operate in unison. At 15:36 06 July 2004, Bert Willing wrote: Flaps & ailerons are flush in full negative, but not the wing fairing. Well, at least on mine. -- Bert Willing ASW20 'TW' 'Andrew Warbrick' a écrit dans le message de ... On the ASW 20 I used to own a share in (German, early model), everything was flush in the neutral (flap 3) position, I've seen a lot of 20's and I do not recall seeing any where the flaps lined up with the wing root in full negative. Oh, and to get back on topic, the spin characteristics were quite benign with a forward CofG but it wouldn't climb very well at all. Andrew Warbrick LS6C 17.5 (everything is flush in full negative on this) At 14:42 06 July 2004, Bert Willing wrote: On the 20, everything is flush in the full negative position. -- Bert Willing ASW20 'TW' 'JJ Sinclair' a écrit dans le message de ... I believe the LS-6 does it that way (flaps and ailerons all even in full negative flap position) my recollection of the 20 is that everything is even at zero flap and zero stick. One can set it up as one wishes, but one may be dialing in undesired consequences. I remember the Boeing engineer who told me, 'Aircraft are designed by geniuses to be operated by idiots'. JJ Sinclair |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owned an A for 17 years. Spun it many times (never inadvertently). If
you abuse the controls at stall, it will spin promptly from positive flap positions. The more positive, the more dramatic. However, as long as you use coordinated controls, it handles predictably, though sometimes sluggishly, with a tendency to spiral dive after stall break. The handbook recommends not applying landing flap until on final and clear of last obstruction. Based on experimenting with recovery from spins initiated with flaps in landing, this is a very good practice to maintain. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris OCallaghan wrote:
Owned an A for 17 years. Spun it many times (never inadvertently). If you abuse the controls at stall, it will spin promptly from positive flap positions. The more positive, the more dramatic. However, as long as you use coordinated controls, it handles predictably, though sometimes sluggishly, with a tendency to spiral dive after stall break. The handbook recommends not applying landing flap until on final and clear of last obstruction. Based on experimenting with recovery from spins initiated with flaps in landing, this is a very good practice to maintain. I think my C model prohibited spinning in Landing flap, so I didn't try spinning. Attempts at incipient spins were futile, as it took so much coarse mishandling of the controls to even stall it, I didn't really get to the start of a spin. The negative angle (up about 5 degrees when the flaps were down 40 degrees) of the ailerons in landing flap seemed to give them good authority even as the glider bucked and rocked with lots of back stick. My CG was about 75%, I think. How did your A model respond? It had more Landing flap available than my C model (60 degrees vs 40). -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There was some discussion about ten years ago that a contributing
factor in the early '20 accidents might have been the type of sealing tape used on the flaps and ailerons. Specifically, before the wholesale adoption of Mylar seals, many of the older ships had white cloth tape on the lower surface that could bulge out at the hinge line under certain airflow conditions, presumably triggering some sort of undesirable behavior. Anyone recall this or know if it was true? Chip Bearden |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Spin Training | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 6 | February 16th 04 04:49 PM |
spin characteristics of new racers | Andy Durbin | Soaring | 14 | January 31st 04 06:05 AM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |