![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 15:00 18 January 2005, Don Johnstone wrote:
I think that the test pilots concerned knew exactly how they got there but it may not have helped them much. I re-call seeing a very good video of a Jaguar that had departed and was tumbling end over end with fuel being forced out of the jet intakes. I think the pilot took about 20000ft to find a point where he could break into the sequence and return to controlled flight. As a result the action to be taken if a Jaguar departs is seize the handle between your legs and pull hard. Well, Don, its a good enough way of passing one's last few moments but I would try ejecting rather than.... and the next part of the line is just so obvious I can't even bring myself to finish.....damn - done it again. Sorry. John |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Galloway wrote:
At 15:00 18 January 2005, Don Johnstone wrote: I think that the test pilots concerned knew exactly how they got there but it may not have helped them much. I re-call seeing a very good video of a Jaguar that had departed and was tumbling end over end with fuel being forced out of the jet intakes. I think the pilot took about 20000ft to find a point where he could break into the sequence and return to controlled flight. As a result the action to be taken if a Jaguar departs is seize the handle between your legs and pull hard. Well, Don, its a good enough way of passing one's last few moments but I would try ejecting rather than.... and the next part of the line is just so obvious I can't even bring myself to finish.....damn - done it again. Now how would the NTSB address *that* in the accident report. Delicately, I'd hope. Shawn |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 14:31 18 January 2005, Colin Lamb wrote:
'What is most important is 'situational awarness'. A pilot must learn to know where he is and how he got there.' The last part of that statemenht may not always be true. I have read reports from test pilots who intentionally place the aircraft in out-of-control positions in order to determine a recovery procedure. A common response is that they ride the aircraft until they are in a position they recognize and as soon as that happens they can recover. How they got there was irrelevant. Although few airplanes use yaw strings (the pilots are still behind the curve a bit), they are normally used on helicopters. Although the pedals are used to counteract the torque of the tail rotor, we operate them the same way - keep the yarn centered. Colin N12HS Wha-a-t? How can you use a yaw string in a helicopter? Doesn't the rotor wash it around? Educate me. (I had one helicopter ride in an H-13 in 1954; didn't see no stinkin' yaw string.) |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"How can you use a yaw string in a helicopter? Doesn't
the rotor wash it around? Educate me. (I had one helicopter ride in an H-13 in 1954; didn't see no stinkin' yaw string.)" Helicopter pilots have learned a lot since 1954. I fly helicopters (just Schweizers). Perhaps the production crew kept putting them on from sailplane days, but they work just like any other yaw string. And, they are brightly colored yarn, too. Only one of the helicopters I have flown has a turn and bank indicator - and all have the yarn. When you are hovering, the yarn is meaningless - but you are not going anywhere, either. As soon as you move to forward flight, the relative wind goes from the front of the helicopter to the back, just like any other aircraft. At best glide ratio, I get just over 3:1, but with a headwind the glide angle approaches that of an elevator. Colin N12HS --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/04 |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy,
Remember my spin entry tests in the V2b a year and a half ago. One of the departures was so violent, I lost reference, and even though I knew which way I entered, I can see how a surprise stall with the same sort of departure could cause disorientation and application of pro spin rudder. At low altitudes (during a save, for instance), the delay in recovery could be very bad news. As for spin dynamics, it might be interesting to look at airfoil tufts throughout to see what's going on. Anyone have a link? I think most of us envision a spin as a straight line down, the aircraft rotating about this axis. That seems too simple. At any rate, the yaw string should always be displaced into the direction of spin (or average there if oscillating). Staying in the spin requires that the inside wing be producing higher drag (as a result of AOA), and thus the pro-rotation displacement. I won't be able to fly until April, but maybe one of you southwestern types could provide some video of the yaw string through 2 or three full rotations. We can discuss this ad nauseum, but a few pictures would make the discussion much more interesting and possibly fruitfull. Andy, you up for it? |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some very interesting thoughts there - especially about
whether or not the glider spins about an axis in a vertically downwards line. The airflows - and especially the behaviour of the yaw string - are very much easier to understand if the glider c of g is thought of descending in a spiral and the centre of the whole spin rotation is inside the rotation circle of the yaw string. From the pilot/glider frame of reference in a steep spin the nearest point on the central axis of rotation of the spin may be a short distance above the pilot's head - or looking down the nose the point of interception of the central axis may be a long way in front of the nose (the first view being like looking down a radius to the centre of an inverted verically descending cone cone and the second being like looking down a side of the cone to the vertically descending point) There is a natural tendency to imagine the spinning glider as rotating a point somewhere near its C of G with the yaw string on the opposite side of the axis of rotation from the tail. But, if the tail and the yaw string were both to turn out to be on the same side of the central axis of rotation of the spin, as described above, then the loose end of the string would, very obviously to everyone, be pointing to the inside spin/downgoing wing side of the canopy - irrespective of the other factors causing the same deviation of the string to the inside that have been described previously in this thread. John Galloway At 17:00 19 January 2005, wrote: Andy, Remember my spin entry tests in the V2b a year and a half ago. One of the departures was so violent, I lost reference, and even though I knew which way I entered, I can see how a surprise stall with the same sort of departure could cause disorientation and application of pro spin rudder. At low altitudes (during a save, for instance), the delay in recovery could be very bad news. As for spin dynamics, it might be interesting to look at airfoil tufts throughout to see what's going on. Anyone have a link? I think most of us envision a spin as a straight line down, the aircraft rotating about this axis. That seems too simple. At any rate, the yaw string should always be displaced into the direction of spin (or average there if oscillating). Staying in the spin requires that the inside wing be producing higher drag (as a result of AOA), and thus the pro-rotation displacement. I won't be able to fly until April, but maybe one of you southwestern types could provide some video of the yaw string through 2 or three full rotations. We can discuss this ad nauseum, but a few pictures would make the discussion much more interesting and possibly fruitfull. Andy, you up for it? |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I won't be able to fly until April, but maybe one of
you southwestern types could provide some video of the yaw string through 2 or three full rotations. We can discuss this ad nauseum, but a few pictures would make the discussion much more interesting and possibly fruitfull. Andy, you up for it? Good idea. I've just looked at some video I took in 2003 which includes a 1 turn spin in each direction. Initially, as the nose drops, the yaw string points inside the spin, i.e. a spin to the right, the string says use more right rudder. Once the glider starts rotating, the string points outside the spin, i.e. spinning right, string says use left rudder. Can't post it, nowhere to put it. Ed. (Pilatus) |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The yaw string just indicates the direction of the flow in the boundary
layer at that point. I have seen in a stabilized spin in a 2-32 the yaw string point in the direction of the turn, straight forward, straight aft and in a direction opposite the direction of the rotation. This was an induced spin with the CG almost at the max allowable aft position. I have heard reports of an ASK-21 doing similar things but have not experienced it. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Possibly looking through the string and just observing the direction
the world is moving and inputting rudder in the direction counter to the direction of motion might have merit? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Spin Training | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 6 | February 16th 04 04:49 PM |
String in the middle does not protect you from a spin | Jim | Soaring | 10 | January 30th 04 02:57 PM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |