![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Fred wrote: Terry: That's the way I explained it too, (& BTW, the phenomenon is noticeable in the east too). There should be a more elegant (or simplistic) explanation, don't you think? One that doesn't require diagrams of lift vectors? Fred ================================================== ============ Fred, I mis-spoke (-typed) and should have said years ago, when I did not know what I did not know. The phenomenon is just more noticable in the big liftie out here-and that is where I first noticed it. I thought you wanted an explanation, not an analogy and thought I did pretty good without the diagrams and in only 30 words or so. For talking to someone's hat while in the thermal I use: Lift is like hitting the gas in the car. This works OK since even 14 year olds have at least a rudimentary idea of what happens in the car. -or- For power pilots, lift is an increase in throttle/thrust. So to climb, we need to hold our speed by pitching up and letting the glider climb. -or- For someone who has sailed, I use a tacking analogy. "Take the lift" with a pitch (or pinch) up--this utilizes another definition for the same word that may ring the bell for the student. In every one of these, I will be at the white board at the conclusion of the flight, or drawing the diagram in the sand between flights if we are waiting for another tow. Terry Claussen |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most reasonable explanation and experienced in both weaker UK lift and
strong western US lift. In many cases, ASI response quicker than vario response. Frank "John Galloway" wrote in message ... It's called the Yates Effect and the mechanism described by Yates in Gliding magazine in 1951 is basically an expanded version of what Robin says. Derek Piggot has an Appendix on the subject in Understanding Gliding. The inverse is also the explanation for the more important phenomenon (in terms of thermallling and final turn stall/spin safety) of the loss of airspeed when we hit sink John Galloway At 21:30 27 March 2005, Robin Birch wrote: In message , Fred writes Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? I've always thought of it as a change in the lift drag vector. If your glider is flying in still air the lift drag vector is pointing up and towards the tail. If rising air is entered, which effectively increases the lift vector the new lift/drag vector points slightly more forward than previously. This reduces the effective drag and the glider accelerates until everything balances out again. This may be total rubbish but it is the model I've found easiest to visualise. Robin -- Robin Birch |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 01:30 28 March 2005, Fred wrote:
Terry: That's the way I explained it too, (& BTW, the phenomenon is noticeable in the east too). There should be a more elegant (or simplistic) explanation, don't you think? One that doesn't require diagrams of lift vectors? Fred If you're flying a child's kite in a steady breeze and give a quick yank on the string, the kite goes up. A glider is designed to convert the vertical pull of gravity into nearly horizontal motion. The uprush of air (change in AoA) on entering a thermal has an effect similar to a sudden increase in gravity (if that were possible) pulling the glider downwards through the air. The glider converts that to an increase in forward motion. You are, in effect, getting a brief winch launch every time you enter a thermal. Ed. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One simple explanation and easy to draw for your students: The CG of
the glider is typically ahead of the "center of lift". An "up" gust will cause nose to pitch down around the CG. Refer to "Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators" for more details. Be "one" with your glider. Feeling (and hearing) the slight airspeed change is usually a faster indication of lift than your vario. So look outside the cockpit to clear, pull and turn into the thermal core! Burt Marfa Gliders, west Texas USA www.flygliders.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had the delightful opportunity to fly with Derek Piggott last year
before the Senior Nationals and specifically asked him about this observation. It seems to me that a thermal is a vertical gust that would be noticed by the wing as increase in AOA and hence the airspeed should decrease..but it doesn't? He said, (as best as I can recollect) that "we used to call this the 'Yates Effect' but that this has pretty much fallen from favor. A thermal with an accelerating core creates somewhat of a venturi that will entrain surrounding air and will manifest itself with horizontal gusts as well as the vertical as you enter the thermal". If I took the trouble to graft it out, I would not be able to illustrate this on paper as it would look like a tailwind pushing me into the thermal rather than a frontal gust, but from the cockpit of a G103 with the Jedi-Master it seemed a perfectly simple explanation. Gene |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's useful to look at extremes here.
If a plane was going straight down (extreme case) and flew into a 10 knot thermal, it's speed would increase by 10 knots instantaneously. If a plane was going straight and level, and flew into a thermal, it's speed would increase by zero knots. no increase. For any rate of descent, the plane's speed would increase upon entry into a thermal by some value between 0 and 10 knots, varying based on it's rate of descent/angle when it penetrates the thermal. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nafod40 wrote:
It's useful to look at extremes here. If a plane was going straight down (extreme case) and flew into a 10 knot thermal, it's speed would increase by 10 knots instantaneously. If a plane was going straight and level, and flew into a thermal, it's speed would increase by zero knots. no increase. For any rate of descent, the plane's speed would increase upon entry into a thermal by some value between 0 and 10 knots, varying based on it's rate of descent/angle when it penetrates the thermal. As I understand what you're saying, the portion of AS increase results from the increase in relative wind due to the component of the thermal in line with the direction of flight, since the glider is descending at an angle. I don't buy it, and here's why (It's been a long time since I did trig but here goes.): 38:1 glider has a glide slope of about 1.5 degrees in still air flies into a 10 kt thermal with an IAS of 50 kts. The component of the thermals upward velocity in the direction of flight is sin1.5x10kts=0.26 kts or 50.26 kts IAS. I see a lot bigger jump than this (like my ASI would show a quarter knot dif!). OK, you math profs can tear me to shreds now. Shawn |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you are onto the right answer here.
Try thinking of it this way. with the glider sitting the ground in flight attitude (for still air, best glide angle) the wing will be angle down somewhat. If you put a fan directly under the wing blowing straight up(the Thermal) it would deflect a portion of the air back creating thrust. In the air this only happens initually as the glider accerates upward it is also generating addtional thrust from the thermal. For example a glider descending at 2kts encounters a thermal going up a 6kts. before hitting the thermal the air is going vertically past the glider at 2kts. Upon entering the thermal the vertical air is going past the glider at 6kts. The glider will accelerate both upward and forward until the glider is as a climb rate of 4kts and the vertical air going past the glider is back to 2kts. Brian CFIIG/ASEL |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian:
I'm not comfortable with that explanation. The glider goes "up" only in relation to the earth, not in relation to the airmass. In fact, the glider is steady in the airmass -- descending at 2 kts (more or less) -- and we only seek out the rising airmass because it puts us higher relative to the earth. Your explanation makes it sound as if the glider is staying steady relative to the earth while the airmass accelerates from 2 to 6 kts. (If this is so, it is only very momentary.) I think Terry and Burt have the explanation that is both aerodynamically accurate and something a student can grasp relatively quickly and easily. Thanks to all. Fred |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred a écrit :
Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? Does the airspeed really increase on thermal entry ??? I am not convinced of that. I think the opposite is true : when the airspeed increases, due to entry into a thermal, turbulence or any other reason, you TE-compensated-variometer believes there is a lift ! -- Denis R. Parce que ça rompt le cours normal de la conversation !!! Q. Pourquoi ne faut-il pas répondre au-dessus de la question ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An odd clearance...can anyone explain? | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 32 | September 18th 04 09:35 PM |
TEC, can anyone use small words and explain this to me? | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | November 16th 03 05:51 PM |
Please explain | T3 | Military Aviation | 28 | November 14th 03 11:11 PM |
Can anyone explain what TFR's are supposed to do? | Corky Scott | Piloting | 33 | October 23rd 03 12:42 PM |
Can someone explain wing loading? | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 4 | September 10th 03 02:33 AM |