![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I have just received our ASW19's flight manual which says to make the approach as follows: "The approach should normally be made at about 46 knotes. For turbulant air a corresponding faster speed must be flown." I have been told:- a) that the unmodified air-brakes have a limited affective speed range b) it is not worth adding the extra paddle if you maintain good speed control. My experience is that:- a) I normally approach at 53 kt + half wind speed and it floats for ages. b) I seemed to remember that coming in at 50 kt the elevator authourity at round out was not that good. (I do tend to round-out late, so could be more progressive with this). Questions: a) 46 kts seems a little low - what do other people use ? b) has anyone got any measured information on glide angle against speed (with full brake). c) is there a maximum speed you would use on approach (in high wind conditions) in order to keep a high rate of descent and therefore a stable configuation. I have just got an iPAQ, etc, so will try and do some measurements (i.e. at height take logs of full airbrake descent at different speeds) and post the results here. Regards, Rob Sharpe PS: According to the flight manual it side slips well, so will try that as well. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have 400 hrs in a ASW19 ,mostly x/c, the airbrakes were modified
to double paddle after about 50 hrs. There is a noticable improvement with the mod. My paddock landing method was to come down through the wind gradient 50-55 knots BUT my aim point was 5-15 meters short of the approach fence go flat over the ground killing speed/easing brake if necessary at a height of 6ft-2meters then at the point where the fence VISUALLY (prob 2-5 meters short of fence) starts going under the nose I would pull full brake , the ASW19 I flew at near max cockpit load with well forward c of g and had LOTS of forward energy.I would use that momentum to flare over the fence and touchdown FIRM but within parameters . This possible because of the energy carried and the large wing area which tended to soften the flare. My average from fence to stop 60-80 meters but I still preferred to land in an uphill paddock ,much easier nowhere near as critical. An ASW19 is a racehorse of an aircraft ,the more you push her the better she goes but make a mistake and she will bite hard. gary "Robert Sharpe" wrote in message om... Hi, I have just received our ASW19's flight manual which says to make the approach as follows: "The approach should normally be made at about 46 knotes. For turbulant air a corresponding faster speed must be flown." I have been told:- a) that the unmodified air-brakes have a limited affective speed range b) it is not worth adding the extra paddle if you maintain good speed control. My experience is that:- a) I normally approach at 53 kt + half wind speed and it floats for ages. b) I seemed to remember that coming in at 50 kt the elevator authourity at round out was not that good. (I do tend to round-out late, so could be more progressive with this). Questions: a) 46 kts seems a little low - what do other people use ? b) has anyone got any measured information on glide angle against speed (with full brake). c) is there a maximum speed you would use on approach (in high wind conditions) in order to keep a high rate of descent and therefore a stable configuation. I have just got an iPAQ, etc, so will try and do some measurements (i.e. at height take logs of full airbrake descent at different speeds) and post the results here. Regards, Rob Sharpe PS: According to the flight manual it side slips well, so will try that as well. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Minimum rate of climb or descent | Aaron Kahn | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 25th 03 03:22 PM |