![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll be taking my first dual in a 1974 Cessna 210II this Sunday and I
won't have access to a POH until then. If anyone could post the V-Speeds and typical traffic pattern speeds, I'd appreciate it so I can start a bit of studying in advance. Also, any words of wisdom about the plane would be great. I've flown a 206 and a 172RG a lot, so I'm visualizing a combination of the two (probably not very accurate). Thanks, Eric |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I flew a 210 once. It took off like a rocket. (My previous high
performance experience at the time was a Cutlass) The cutlass is a really nice plane - too bad they stopped making them. I don't know how a 206 handles, maybe the 210 won't seem so unusually powerful to you. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eric Bartsch" wrote in message oups.com... I'll be taking my first dual in a 1974 Cessna 210II this Sunday and I won't have access to a POH until then. If anyone could post the V-Speeds and typical traffic pattern speeds, I'd appreciate it so I can start a bit of studying in advance. Also, any words of wisdom about the plane would be great. I've flown a 206 and a 172RG a lot, so I'm visualizing a combination of the two (probably not very accurate). Hello Eric, I have a '79 210. All speeds in knots Vx about 95 Vy 65-70 Vso 50-55 Best glide 70-80 Maneuvering speed 110-120 IFR Approach level no flaps 130-140 (gear up, about 18") Approach level w/flaps 110 VFR Pattern 100-110 Turn Final about 90 Over the fence 65-70 Cruise 160, 80 pounds per hour Definitely a heavier feel overall than a 172 ![]() me that it was "nose heavy" in the flare, but I never found that to be the case. That's all I can think of at this hour, except that it's a great plane overall, we love ours. -- Cheers, John Clonts Temple, Texas N7NZ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Clonts" wrote in message ... Hello Eric, I have a '79 210. All speeds in knots Vx about 95 Vy 65-70 Ooops, better flip those Vx and Vy speeds! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Clonts wrote:
Definitely a heavier feel overall than a 172 ![]() in a departure stall. People told me that it was "nose heavy" in the flare, but I never found that to be the case. Flying a C-210 is good training for flying a C-402. Elevator forces are very similar and much heavier than the C-172. That being said, it's a very capable airplane. I had access to both normal C-210s and we had one with a Robertson STOL kit installed. *That* was a beast. V speeds were virtually identical to the C-172's and a full STOL takeoff involved pulling it off at 42 knots with your right leg quivering under a load heavier than a Vmc demonstration in the C-402. Absolutely incredible! No mush even at the slower speeds. Normal takeoff in the STOL bird was at 60 knots. I used 80 knots in the conventional C-210. We had a three plane trip from Marsh Harbour, Bahamas to St. Lucie County, FL once. I was in an ordinary C-210, the other two aircraft were a T-210 and a Turbo Aztec. We all landed within 5 minutes of one another. I burned 19 gallons, the T-210 burned 26 gallons and the Turbo Aztec burned 59 gallons of fuel! You just can't beat a C-210 for bang for the buck. And for what it's worth: a fully loaded C-210 sinks clean at about 700 fpm with the engine out. Don't ask me how I know this. To compare, a Piper Lance sinks at 1100 fpm under the same conditions. Don't ask me how I know that, either. That's all I can think of at this hour, except that it's a great plane overall, we love ours. I can see why. The 210 is one hell of an airplane. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are those gear-up or gear-down speeds?
(Gear down speeds are slower than gear up speeds) John Clonts wrote: I have a '79 210. All speeds in knots Vx about 95 Vy 65-70 Ooops, better flip those Vx and Vy speeds! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
Are those gear-up or gear-down speeds? (Gear down speeds are slower than gear up speeds) Vle and Vlo are both 140 KIAS on the C-210. With gear down and with 10° of flap, best angle is 72 knots; best rate 80 knots. Retract the gear once obstacles are cleared, then the flaps after you accelerate through 80 knots. Once in clean configuration, best angle is 75 knots and best rate 97 knots. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote in message . com... john smith wrote: Are those gear-up or gear-down speeds? (Gear down speeds are slower than gear up speeds) Vle and Vlo are both 140 KIAS on the C-210. With gear down and with 10° of flap, best angle is 72 knots; best rate 80 knots. Retract the gear once obstacles are cleared, then the flaps after you accelerate through 80 knots. Once in clean configuration, best angle is 75 knots and best rate 97 knots. My manual agrees on the best angle 72 (at MGW, 3800 lbs) as listed in the Takeoff Distance table; and agrees with the clean 97 knots best rate in the Rate of Climb table. But I don't see any specific reference for best rate dirty of 80 or best angle clean of 75. Does your manual specify that? Or are you just citing your experience and practices? -- Cheers, John Clonts Temple, Texas N7NZ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Clonts wrote:
My manual agrees on the best angle 72 (at MGW, 3800 lbs) as listed in the Takeoff Distance table; and agrees with the clean 97 knots best rate in the Rate of Climb table. But I don't see any specific reference for best rate dirty of 80 or best angle clean of 75. Does your manual specify that? Or are you just citing your experience and practices? My manual (for a 1976 Centurion) specifies the clean V speeds (both of them) on the first page of the normal operations section. It doesn't come right out and say what the dirty speeds are but I've extrapolated them from the normal and high performance takeoff procedures published in the same section of the manual. For example, it says to establish an 80 knot climb before you raise the gear for a normal takeoff. I may not be exactly on the money for the dirty best rate but I should be pretty damned close. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks to everyone who posted C-210 information. I'm looking forward to flying the plane on Sunday and eventually getting checked out in it to do some long XC flights this summer (should be a bit faster than the 206 I used last summer). Sounds like it drops like a rock without power, but that should be familiar after flying a Cherokee Six-300. Thanks again, Eric |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 03:40 PM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Piloting | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Products | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Cessna 337C Speeds | Al | Piloting | 1 | August 20th 03 05:36 PM |