![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous thread (could have been as much as a year ago), I
proposed getting a twin as my first airplane. I wanted a Cessna 421, but wiser and more experienced people talked me out of it. After a long period of thinking and research, I've decided to get a Cessna T210. I have some time in type, plus a lot of complex, high performance and RG time. I would likely get my instrument rating in the plane I buy. I've been discussing this at lenght on the CPA forum, but always welcome more information. Any insights by current and former T210 owners would be helpful. John Szpara Private pilot Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john szpara" wrote in message news:1118646675.a93d6cafa637b661be0a19c3ac002514@t eranews... In a previous thread (could have been as much as a year ago), I proposed getting a twin as my first airplane. I wanted a Cessna 421, but wiser and more experienced people talked me out of it. After a long period of thinking and research, I've decided to get a Cessna T210. I have some time in type, plus a lot of complex, high performance and RG time. I would likely get my instrument rating in the plane I buy. I've been discussing this at lenght on the CPA forum, but always welcome more information. Any insights by current and former T210 owners would be helpful. I had a 1981 T210...it was fast, comfortable and a maintenance hog. It spent almost as much time in the shop as it did in the air. Not sure I got a lemon, but 210's are "noted" for high upkeep. Traded it for a B56 Baron after ten months and, though the Baron was ten years newer, it cost less to operate than the 210 other than fuel costs. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You might ask around some shops in your area. The gear on the 210 seems
to be a cause of lots of cash flow once the airframe gets over a couple thousand hours. I would probably look the turbo Bo A36 over the T210. Of course, when actually facing that situation I bought the Mooney. The Mooney is a bit smaller than the A36 but the A36 does not come with an FAA known-ice certificate, the Mooney and the 210 can. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john szpara wrote:
In a previous thread (could have been as much as a year ago), I proposed getting a twin as my first airplane. I wanted a Cessna 421, but wiser and more experienced people talked me out of it. After a long period of thinking and research, I've decided to get a Cessna T210. I have some time in type, plus a lot of complex, high performance and RG time. I would likely get my instrument rating in the plane I buy. I've been discussing this at lenght on the CPA forum, but always welcome more information. Any insights by current and former T210 owners would be helpful. John Szpara Private pilot Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT You should subscribe to Aviation Consumer. they ahve a very detailed review, including maint info, at aviation-consumer.com, in the subscribers-only section. I won't violate their copyright but their subtitle for the review is: Cessna’s premier single is a wonderful machine when it’s working right. And that’s the trouble ... it’s sensitive to proper maintenance. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Matt Barrow wrote: I had a 1981 T210...it was fast, comfortable and a maintenance hog. It spent almost as much time in the shop as it did in the air. Not sure I got a lemon, but 210's are "noted" for high upkeep. Yep, that's what I've heard too. With a 210 you get the newest one you can find. When I decide I need to go fast no way do I buy a Cessna retract, and I'm a Cessna guy. Bonanza all the way with me. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:29:09 -0400, xyzzy wrote:
You should subscribe to Aviation Consumer. they ahve a very detailed review, including maint info, at aviation-consumer.com, in the subscribers-only section. I won't violate their copyright but their subtitle for the review is: Cessna’s premier single is a wonderful machine when it’s working right. And that’s the trouble ... it’s sensitive to proper maintenance. Thanks. I joined this morning, and found and read one article on the 210. John Szpara Private pilot Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote: I had a 1981 T210...it was fast, comfortable and a maintenance hog. It spent almost as much time in the shop as it did in the air. Not sure I got a lemon, but 210's are "noted" for high upkeep. Yep, that's what I've heard too. With a 210 you get the newest one you can find. When I decide I need to go fast no way do I buy a Cessna retract, and I'm a Cessna guy. Bonanza all the way with me. The gear usually isn't where the maintenance money goes, unless you have an older 210 with the main gear doors still on it. Engine and turbocharger problems are what eat up my 210-owning friend. In 600+ hours of owning a Cessna retract, the only money I've spent on the gear (outside of whatever it costs to swing them for the annual) was a one-time AD inspection that revealed no problems. Early Cardinal RGs are known for troublesome gear, but later ones are ok in that respect. 172 and 182 RGs are not notably troublesome as long as proper maintenance is done and their actuators and pivots have had the relevant AD and SB done. Still rather have a Bonanza, though. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I flew about 70 hrs in a 1969 T210 and loved every minute of it.
But.....it was troublesome, not in engine/turbo area, or in gear, but with fuel starvation/percolating issues. It's a known snag with the earlier models and the upgraded fuel line system is very very expensive to install. Avoid models before about 1975. "john szpara" wrote in message news:1118689196.de32f2467dabff96260f05f3e5a04d9b@t eranews... On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:29:09 -0400, xyzzy wrote: You should subscribe to Aviation Consumer. they ahve a very detailed review, including maint info, at aviation-consumer.com, in the subscribers-only section. I won't violate their copyright but their subtitle for the review is: Cessna's premier single is a wonderful machine when it's working right. And that's the trouble ... it's sensitive to proper maintenance. Thanks. I joined this morning, and found and read one article on the 210. John Szpara Private pilot Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Advice and experts with 400 series Cessnas (414 and 421), purchase and training | [email protected] | Owning | 36 | January 9th 05 02:32 AM |
Seeking advice on pilot training approach... | Rob | General Aviation | 8 | December 15th 04 12:58 AM |
boot camp advice | jameson | Military Aviation | 17 | July 22nd 04 05:12 AM |
Parachute advice | Clive Hadley | Soaring | 5 | January 4th 04 04:12 AM |
Help - I busted into the Class B SEATAC airspace last night, does anyone have any advice ? | steve mew | Piloting | 38 | October 28th 03 06:08 PM |