![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good comments, Don.
If the break occurs between the winch and drogue the 'chute will collapse and pass harmlessly below the glider, releasing automatically from the glider in most cases. If the break is between the glider and drogue, (weak link failure) then the drogue will be open as long as the winch driver maintains power. In this case, the winch driver is the key. My driving technique is to cut the throttle and let the drogue collapse and drop to the ground. Comments? The worst case that is very rarely seen is that somehow the glider gets in front of the drogue and it overtakes the glider from behind. This is the equivalent of getting an air tow rope entangled with the glider. Both are equally rare. This is why once the drogue is on the ground, the winch driver must not move the cable until he hears that it is safe to do so. It is very important to point out that almost all the cable breaks were using the old steel wire. The new Dyneema winch cables rarely break. The last I heard, Aero Club Landau in Germany had more than 4000 launches on their 'plastic' cable without a single break. ACL is also getting more than 1200 meters AGL with their winch launches. Bill Daniels The pilot is trained not to land on the wire if at all possible. "Don Johnstone" wrote in message ... Just to add to what Bill has said, the really low launch failure 100 is one of the minor problem areas. If the launch is flown correctly it can be quite safely handled. The good point is, as Bill has pointed out that there is a large amount of airfield still in front of you. The bad news is that by the time the nose has been lowered the airspeed may be below the minimum allowed for the deployment of airbrakes. It may not be possible to lower the nose any further to increase the speed because of the proximity to the ground and therefore a touchdown has to be achieved without using airbrake. Patience is required as most modern gliders float a long way even at 50 kts in ground effect. (Grob 103 will travel the length of the 10000ft runway at Marham from 20ft/60kts) Simulating a launch failure at this height is not recomended as there is a real danger that the drogue will inflate as the winch driver cuts the power and drape itself over the cockpit. The good news is that such breaks are rare as the strain on the cable is reducing before increasing again. The procedure can be simulated by carrying out a faster than normal approach, pulling up and closing the airbrakes and then recovering from that situation which puts the glider in the same situation as a low break but without the cable in the way. At 04:30 28 June 2005, Bill Daniels wrote: 'Kilo Charlie' wrote in message news:9D3we.3579$Qo.3471@fed1read01... Your input re winch launches is appreciated Bill....esp for those of us that have never done one! Please don't take this as a criticism of winch launches but through this thread there has not been any mention of what happens at the critical low level altitude when the cable breaks. There is clearly also a zone of real problems with aerotows too.....esp here in the desert with few, if any landing options straight ahead. What do you guys teach re breaks at 100 feet? It seems like landing ahead would be good but how much altitude does it take to regain the necessary speed to be able to control the glider for landing when at a high angle of attack? Sorry if this is too obvious for those of you that do it all the time! Casey Thanks, Casey. The climb profile must be such that a safe recovery with generous margins be possible from any height that a cable break occurs. Safety is the product of airspeed, altitude and attitude - and good training. If the break happens at 100 feet, then 90%+ of the runway lies ahead to receive the glider. At 100 feet, the glider will have full climb airspeed, approx. 60 knots, but then pitch attitude will only be 20 - 30 degrees. A prompt, gentle pushover to a glide at approach airspeed is all that is needed to land straight ahead. If the break occurs higher, say 300 - 400 feet, then the straight ahead landing is still possible with spoilers but a tight 360 pattern is also possible. The two options overlap by a good amount of height depending on the airfield. At this height, the climb attitude will be about 45 degrees nose up (although from the cockpit it will feel like 60 degrees) so a more aggressive pushover is needed. All these situations will be practiced over and over until the instructor feels the student reacts instinctively and correctly to each. The student must firmly push the nose down until the airspeed is observed to be at a safe value and increasing before establishing a glide for a straight ahead landing or a turn for an abbreviated pattern. I must admit that winch launch LOOKS scary and FEELS scary to the uninitiated but the procedures worked out over literally tens of millions of launches in Europe and elsewhere make it actually safer than air tow. As for releasing over the winch instead of wherever the tow plane takes you, I see by looking at a lot of On-Line Contest IGC files, that most air tow releases happen within a mile of the takeoff point and the glider is rarely in a thermal at release but must glide around looking for one just like with a winch launch. If you don't find a thermal, a winch re-light will cost you less than $10. The latest European winches are getting even heavy gliders to over 1000 meters AGL so finding lift shouldn't be a problem. Bill Daniels |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F.L. Whiteley writes
I was first introduced to the push-over at altitude while being checked out for winch launch at RAF Bicester. It's a useful exercise for experiencing the amount of push over required and to see the amount of dirt and dust that might float up from the floor. It can be alarming the first time and ignored subsequently. On a slightly light-hearted note, I consider the chance to throw all the dust and junk that accumulates on the cockpit floor up the nose of the instructor behind me to be a petty but quite fitting vengeance for his having pulled the plug on a perfectly good launch in the first case for the sake of drill ![]() -- Bill Gribble http://www.scapegoatsanon.demon.co.uk - Learn from the mistakes of others. - You won't live long enough to make all of them yourself. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F.L. Whiteley wrote:
Statement: "You have control" Response: "I have control" I have known of an instructor and tow pilot flying together where no one was in control and the glider exceeded VNe slightly in a dive and was recovered gently once the situation was realized. It could have ended otherwise. The instructors of my club were pretty hardcore with that "my controls / your controls" thing. I would never have thought somebody would not do so... until: Until I got my introduction into mountain soaring. Not a club thing, so the instructors were unknown to me. Once during a flight, the instructor demonstrated something, I forgot what. Anyway, after the demonstration, we flew along gently and quietly. After a while, he made a shallow turn away from the mountain into the valley. "What is he doing?" I asked myself, waiting for his explanation. He didn't explain anything, but after a while, he suddenly asked: Why are you flying over the valley? Turned out, neither of us had the controls, both thinking the other was flying. So much for a well trimmed glider. I've learnt that lesson. Stefan |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LMAO now. Thanks!
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have they changed that much? My ideas were trained into by BGA
instructors in the late 1970s. Alas, but this discussion wasn't about winch launching. My fault for letting it descend into something in which I have very limited experience, and apparently with earlier generation equipment. What I was responding to was this notion of how a glider might be spun with coordinated controls during a winch cable break recovery. So let's get back to that. In another thread. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
actually, it was the emphasis on this and noticing my instructor making discrete requests of the ground crew to go find ballast that led me to guessing what it was he had up his sleeve when that time came! One fellow student made the mistake of telling the instructor that he had smelled the exercise coming and that it thus was no surprise. He got the signature in the little leaflet that we use to record training progress... ....and another simulated cable-break without any warning at the very next launch. Still a perfectly good recovery. Ciao, MM -- Marian Aldenhövel, Rosenhain 23, 53123 Bonn. +49 228 624013. http://www.marian-aldenhoevel.de "What did you expect to see out of a Torquay hotel bedroom window? Sydney Opera House perhaps? The Hanging Gardens of Babylon? Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically across the prairie!" Basil Fawlty |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marian Aldenhövel wrote:
Hi, Training for wire breaks starts at a high altitude in free flight. The zooms, simulated break at 60 knots and pushover are repeated many times until the student performs them instinctively. Interestingly we don't do it like this where I am learning to fly. We are taught to plan every launch as featuring a wire break and to preplan up to what altitudes to land straight, turn back or fly the pattern as part of the takeoff-check. During training we are to say these altitudes and actions out loud. Before soloing we do a minimum of three excercises where the instructor pulls the knob at some point during the launch. So it's the real thing, nothing "emergency-like" there. We do not train wire-breaks at altitude. Still I feel very safe. And I also found pushing over, gaining normal speed and then attitude the natural thing to do. It helps to have a plan as to what to do next but up to there it really is instinct. I have not heard of any of my fellow-students _not_ reacting that way. it Ciao, MM It comes down to flying the glider. Winch launches are normal practice, and recovery from launch failures are part of our normal training. So apply the normal rules. We teach / have been taught a simple truth - nothing you do is going to improve matters before you have a safe flying speed. If there is a launch failure, you have to retain or regain safe flying speed and attitude first. It does not matter in what part of the flight regime you are in, if you find yourself below stall speed, you soon find you are not flying. When close to the ground this can have unpleasant consequences. So we learn to always have enough energy to regain a safe speed,attitude and height should a cable fail. This means no "rocket" launches, but rather a smooth progression into the steep climb, at a safe speed. If the cable then breaks, it is simply a matter of smoothly but decisively moving the stick forward (no aerobatic bunting required) and a little patience till the airspeed recovers. Again, there is no point in getting ahead of things here, once the glider is flying at a normal attitude and speed is the time to assess your choices. YOu should have planned what your alternatives would be before the launch, so this should be a time to confirm and act on them. But you are flying a normal aircraft in a normal way. The only thing unusual will be how far you are down the runway, and this is dependant on how high the failure occurred. If you are really low, you land ahead, there is lots of runway. If there is lots of runway behind you, you should have lots of height to make a circuit. There is one field where I fly, where you have to be careful of energy, launching uphill, with a heavy two seater on a shortish cable, there is an uncomfortable part of the launch where you have few safe options. But this is not a usual winch situation and still a lot safer than trying the same thing behind a tug... Bad situations, as always come from a sequence of bad choices, or events, and you can usually avoid them. As an example: From personal experience, it can be somewhat unnerving to find yourself having to keep the stick forward when there is an awful expanse of brown stuff filling the canopy. How did I get there - low wing loading trainer, 10kt on the nose and an over enthusiastic winch driver had me at the upper end of the safe winch speed window at 20", so I rotated into the steep climb to control the speed. At 60" going through the wind gradient now, and the winch driver is still poaring on the power when the weak link goes. Training and experience take over even for a low time pilot, and I push over smoothly, (I will admit to lifting the dust... ) Then it is a case of wait , seemingly for ever until the speed is back. Nose is well down at this point, but you are not worried about the outside at this point - only with flying percisely, and getting the speed back in the green arc. Then a smooth transition to normal attitude, pop the brakes and the shortest flight of my career is over. Should have released when I felt the excess power Should have accepted overspeed rather than pulling so hard to slow the winch Should have had better situational awareness and realised I was getting into a dangerous corner Lots of "should haves", but the point is that because of having enough speed, even a cable break at very low height in the steep climb was recoverable. Despite having less than 20kt on the ASI at the top of the push over, the low G meant the aircraft was still flying. Of course, coarse control movements will get you into trouble here, but then they aren't advisable any other time either. For what it is worth - before we fixed our drum, we had such frequent cable breaks that my instructors were confident of my ability to handle one - I had 9 real failures before going solo... These days we have to simulate them. -- Bruce Greeff Std Cirrus #57 I'm no-T at the address above. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Wright wrote in message ...
At 14:24 28 June 2005, F.L. Whiteley wrote: At my club we do something similar with winch launch radio signals during the launch process. Nothing else is accepted. 'Up slack, up slack, up slack' 'Go, go, go' 'Stop, stop, stop' Forgive me but this must sound like Yogi Bear conducting the launch ! In the U.K. we have the following system to help avoid confusion of a mishear Take up slack ( Three words ) All Out ( Two words ) Stop ( One word ) To get rid of radio failures, bad transmission, confusion or mishear etc. etc. We in the Netherlands generaly do not use radio's at all. We use a bright light: flashing (take up slack) full (all out), out (stop!) for any other communication with the winch we use radio if neccesary. Sometimes a large white board (diameter 1 meter) in a pole is used: up (take up slak), down (all out), waving left to right, right to left (stop!!) If the winch has the sun in the back then sometimes the withe board is difficult to see but a bright light (from a car for instance) is always vissible. Diederik |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 08:54:18 -0600, "Bill Daniels"
wrote: It is very important to point out that almost all the cable breaks were using the old steel wire. The new Dyneema winch cables rarely break. The last I heard, Aero Club Landau in Germany had more than 4000 launches on their 'plastic' cable without a single break. ACL is also getting more than 1200 meters AGL with their winch launches. Flying on the same airfield as the Landau Aero Club, I'd like to add a few comments: - There have been lots of cable breaks with Dyneema ropes now (also of other Dyneema cable users - these plastic cables are used by many clubs in Germany now). At the moment my club is not sure if the Dyneema cable is really cheaper to operate than steel cable on the long run. - The number of flights that reached more than 1.000 meters can be counted on one hand, and required to place glider and winch in areas that were far away from any runway... Bye Andreas |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
41 years ago I joined the Vultures club in Michigan, a winch only club
where I learned to fly gliders and soar. Off topic I know - but I was on a short visit to the US just recently and spent a very enjoyable day with the Vultures. It was interesting to compare their setup to our own club in the UK. Chris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |