![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A student I know was denied their Canadian Medical Certificate because they
were in an alcohol / drug treatment program. They have to appeal before some kind of tribunal. Anyone familiar with this process? moo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Happy Dog" wrote in message . .. A student I know was denied their Canadian Medical Certificate because they were in an alcohol / drug treatment program. They have to appeal before some kind of tribunal. Anyone familiar with this process? Can you clarify: "were in the program" at the time of application for medical? OR: "were in the program" previously and were no longer in the program at the time of application??? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Icebound"
"Happy Dog" wrote in message . .. A student I know was denied their Canadian Medical Certificate because they were in an alcohol / drug treatment program. They have to appeal before some kind of tribunal. Anyone familiar with this process? Can you clarify: "were in the program" at the time of application for medical? OR: "were in the program" previously and were no longer in the program at the time of application??? They had successfully completed the program and obtained and presented the documentation stating this. I think that they completed the program a few months before applying. Maybe there's some sort of waiting period they like to see. moo |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Happy Dog" wrote in message ... "Icebound" "Happy Dog" wrote in message . .. A student I know was denied their Canadian Medical Certificate because they were in an alcohol / drug treatment program. They have to appeal before some kind of tribunal. Anyone familiar with this process? Can you clarify: "were in the program" at the time of application for medical? OR: "were in the program" previously and were no longer in the program at the time of application??? They had successfully completed the program and obtained and presented the documentation stating this. I think that they completed the program a few months before applying. Maybe there's some sort of waiting period they like to see. The Canadian "medical examiner's guidelines" are on-line at http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/Cam/guide.htm ....and in PDF format: http://www.tc.gc.ca/publications/EN/...R/TP13312E.pdf The following link has the addresses and phone numbers for the Regional Aviation Medical Officers. I would think that a call to the appropriate regional office will get you the info about appeal procedures. http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/Cam/offices.htm --- Alcohol is only mentioned 6 times in the entire handbook, mostly in the context of its effects... contributing to hypoxia, etc... and not as a "condition". Some conditions, such as the heart, merit several chapters. "Substance abuse" gets the following paragraph in the "Other Policies" section: Substance Abuse / Dependence: Disqualifying. Once "recovering", an individual assessment to assess risk of relapse. Restricted category may be recommended. Continued abstinence is the key to medical recertification. ---- So I guess the fight will be to define "Continued abstinence". In the handbook, there does not appear to be any firm definition of the required length of time. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Icebound" wrote in message
... They had successfully completed the program and obtained and presented the documentation stating this. I think that they completed the program a few months before applying. Maybe there's some sort of waiting period they like to see. snipped, with thanks Alcohol is only mentioned 6 times in the entire handbook, mostly in the context of its effects... contributing to hypoxia, etc... and not as a "condition". Some conditions, such as the heart, merit several chapters. "Substance abuse" gets the following paragraph in the "Other Policies" section: Substance Abuse / Dependence: Disqualifying. Once "recovering", an individual assessment to assess risk of relapse. Restricted category may be recommended. Continued abstinence is the key to medical recertification. So I guess the fight will be to define "Continued abstinence". In the handbook, there does not appear to be any firm definition of the required length of time. Well, they'll have to get some representation to go through the tribunal process. Perhaps they do this with anyone recently treated. I'll post again when I find out. moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFI without commercial? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 75 | December 8th 10 04:17 PM |
Sport Pilot cuts off special issuance at the knees | Juan~--~Jimenez | Home Built | 40 | August 10th 04 01:19 PM |
Question Medical | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 5 | June 11th 04 05:12 AM |
US troops denied medical benefits | John Galt | Military Aviation | 1 | December 20th 03 08:59 PM |
Question on medical and kidney stones | nospam | Piloting | 13 | November 8th 03 07:10 AM |