![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Transport Canada requires a three month period, after the cessation of
medicated drops (required for about a week after the surgery), and then a re-test, before allowing PIC duties. I don't believe the same exists in the US (several postings here already detailing requirements). I had both eyes done in January. Love the freedom, but the three months was a drag. Was training at the time, so managed to do lot's of my dual time in the intervening months (which is why I did the surgery then and didn't wait for post licensing). Solo was a long time coming because of it though. John T wrote: I had my surgery in 2001. I went for my 1st 3rd class in 2002, about 18 months later. FAA sent me a 2 page form for my opth (I can't spell it...) to fill out. Unfortunately at the time, I didn't know better, and trusted the doctor to send it in. Now that I'm nearing my check ride, I find out about this, so they sent me another copy of the form, I go to a different doctor and I send in the forms myself. FAA said no problem. I think there is also the possibility you might have to wait 6 months after the surgery??? I seem to recall something about that. It doesn't stop you from flying though. You can fly, just not as PIC. John |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave S wrote:
There is another change that occurs in they eye as you reach middle and older age: The lens of the eye becomes stiffer and less flexible. This affects the eye's ability to "accomodate" or focus on items at different distances. My opthamalogist told me that there's a new procedure coming along that will also take care of this. He says it will cost about the same as LASIK. Come to think out it, his office should start offering it about now. I need to check into it a bit more. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had it and have no problems.
As long as you pass the vision tests. There are possible side-effects, especially with night vision. I have some "unsharp edge" in low light conditions, but am still able to pass the vision test. I'm 20/20, but in low-light, I'm still 20/20, but with some little things due to the surgery. Now - if you're able to pass the regular light condition vision exam, but not night vision, you could have a restriction to daytime VFR conditions only. You cold still even get the PP ticket, but no night flying. Otherwise, you'd have to go Sport Pilot, which doesn't have anything more than the Drivers License vision exam. Gary |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary G" wrote in message ... I had it and have no problems. As long as you pass the vision tests. There are possible side-effects, especially with night vision. I have some "unsharp edge" in low light conditions, but am still able to pass the vision test. I'm 20/20, but in low-light, I'm still 20/20, but with some little things due to the surgery. Now - if you're able to pass the regular light condition vision exam, but not night vision, you could have a restriction to daytime VFR conditions only. You cold still even get the PP ticket, but no night flying. Otherwise, you'd have to go Sport Pilot, which doesn't have anything more than the Drivers License vision exam. Gary And your still limited to Day VFR |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote:
Dave S wrote: There is another change that occurs in they eye as you reach middle and older age: The lens of the eye becomes stiffer and less flexible. This affects the eye's ability to "accomodate" or focus on items at different distances. My opthamalogist told me that there's a new procedure coming along that will also take care of this. He says it will cost about the same as LASIK. Come to think out it, his office should start offering it about now. I need to check into it a bit more. The doc that was manning the optical society (or whatever it's called) booth at Oshkosh mentioned this possibility, also. I think it involves implantation of an artificial lens? ... or am I thinking of something else? My LASIK story: I was in the -4.0 to -4.5 range in both eyes and had them both done about 6 years ago. I was already presbyopic and using reading glasses. I had both eyes adjusted for distant vision. From my perspective it was hugely successful and worth it. It freed me from wearing glasses or contact lenses for a lot of activities. I particularly liked being able to walk in the rain without looking through wet glasses, and being able to do sports without glasses. I still needed reading glasses, but I knew to expect that going in. I had slightly more coma. I think that's what it's called - bright lines appearing to pass through a point source of light at night. I had some coma before, and I quickly accommodated to the change and it was not troublesome. Now, 6 years later, I am back to wearing glasses for driving and flying, and increasingly for other activities as well. One eye has drifted significantly back toward myopia, so I have a sort of accidental monovision (one eye is optimized for distant vision, and the other for close-up). The monovision actually has some advantages. When I wear my bifocals, I have good vision in both eyes both distant and close-up. Subjectively, I possibly have slightly less acuity corrected now than I did corrected before the surgery, but I'm not sure. Anyway I have adequate acuity and can get along without corrective lenses for a lot of activities, which is good. The reason one eye has drifted back toward myopia, I'm told, is that I have an incipient cataract in that eye. No prediction about how fast it will develop. Dave |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Right.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had to have a recent eye exam (within past year)
from Opthamologist (not optometrist). There is a standard Eye Exam form that the FAA uses and requires. Quite fortuitously, my Opthamologist happened to be a former flight surgeon and was quite familiar with the form. There is a specific form - yes. It cost me no extra than a "routine eye exam" with my opthamologist. But it is "more than typical". |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just saw a short segment on the new type surgery, its called EPI-LASIK.
They qouted about $5600.00 on the show. Do a google and see what else can be found |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|