![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello All:
With the price of fuel going up and the price of AeroTows close behind it I think the need to follow the lead of our brethren in the UK is close at hand. I have heard talk of the infamous $100.00 tow and know that I for one can't afford it, I have to work for a living as do most of you! I and some of my fellow pilots are wanting to start a new club and are want to use winch, auto tows and reverse pulley launching exclusively. Let's discuss the different aspects of ground launching as the only thing that will save our sport and make it inviting once again to new students. Thanks Rusty |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rusty wrote: Hello All: With the price of fuel going up and the price of AeroTows close behind it I think the need to follow the lead of our brethren in the UK is close at hand. I have heard talk of the infamous $100.00 tow and know that I for one can't afford it, I have to work for a living as do most of you! I and some of my fellow pilots are wanting to start a new club and are want to use winch, auto tows and reverse pulley launching exclusively. Let's discuss the different aspects of ground launching as the only thing that will save our sport and make it inviting once again to new students. Thanks Rusty http://groups.yahoo.com/group/winchdesign/ Many of the issues are discuseed here and there are some archival files/images to review. I'm quite happy to carry on here or in the group. There are a few stumbling blocks to ground launching, but most can be overcome. Space is definitely one. If your launch rope can span 4000ft or more, it's very attractive. Others have done with less distance. Location helps. Thinking outside the box helps also. So, where are you? Appears you may be in Texas. That could be fortunate as there are some ground launch activities there, in case pilot and instructor qualifications are needed. If you are seriously considering starting a club in the US, have a look here http://www.soarcsa.org/ssa/clubs/2005_start_here.htm Frank Whiteley SSA Clubs & Chapters Committee member CSA Winchmeister |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did all my training as far as passenger carrying , using a reverse auto
tow system. If there is runway length available, I think nothing will beat it for speed and low cost.We regularly got 3000 foot launches using 6000 foot of 16 guage piano wire. Ken Reynolds |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 07:26:26 UTC, "Ken Reynolds"
wrote: : I did all my training as far as passenger carrying , using a reverse auto : tow system. If there is runway length available, I think nothing will beat : it for speed and low cost. And there is nothing to encourage take off like two tons of pickup heading towards you at a closing speed of over 100mph ... I think both the glider and the pilot are launched by fear. Ian PS But seriously, did a reverse pulley autotow at Connel a few years back, very easy smooth launch. -- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
16 gauge piano wire sounds remarkably thin, unless it was a special high
tensile type. Cotsold GC and Essex GC in the UK used 13 gauge (easier than 11 gauge to handle, join, etc. but prone to breaks) or later 11 gauge (rarely broke, but harder to tie knots, and needed larger pulley diameter for reverse pulley). The large diameters required led to Cotswold going for a non-rotating "pulley" made up from lots of small rollers round its rim (but it had no guillotine). Essex used two large rollers, lots of inertia, but it enabled a flat anvil to be between them so that a spring-loaded chisel could be released to cut the cable in emergency. Before reverse pulley, Essex used 13 gauge for straight autotow. It often broke. Theoretically, the weak link should be weaker than the cable, but we were using uncalibrated polypropylene rope of uncertain breaking strain. Starting over, I would be looking at Dyneema stronger than the highest rated weak link needed, and the main cable should rarely if ever break. For reverse pulley, I would look at the Cotswold type but incorporate a flat part of the "pulley" with an anvil in line with the pivot, like the Essex set up. The spring loaded chisel would go through the hollow pivot shaft. For the benefit of those who have not seen a pulley system, it needs to pivot about a horizontal axle, and to swing to some extent, to equalise the angles and allow the cable to run true from the glider (which might be to one side of the runway, e.g. in a cross wind), into the top of the pulley, and out from the bottom to the tow vehicle. Chris N. __________________________________________________ _________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Again:
Thank you all for the response, it is all very welcome. I do live in South Texas and we have access to a basically un-used well kept 200'x6000' hard packed grass field. We have recently picked up an older winch that needs a litte TCL but with a little work will be very usable. We are also setting up for straight auto-tow and are in the process of building pulleys for reverse pulley. One of the many questions I have is this: is a parachute necessary on straight auto-tow and if so how far from the glider should the parachute be located? Many more questions later. Thanks Rusty Chris Nicholas wrote: 16 gauge piano wire sounds remarkably thin, unless it was a special high tensile type. Cotsold GC and Essex GC in the UK used 13 gauge (easier than 11 gauge to handle, join, etc. but prone to breaks) or later 11 gauge (rarely broke, but harder to tie knots, and needed larger pulley diameter for reverse pulley). The large diameters required led to Cotswold going for a non-rotating "pulley" made up from lots of small rollers round its rim (but it had no guillotine). Essex used two large rollers, lots of inertia, but it enabled a flat anvil to be between them so that a spring-loaded chisel could be released to cut the cable in emergency. Before reverse pulley, Essex used 13 gauge for straight autotow. It often broke. Theoretically, the weak link should be weaker than the cable, but we were using uncalibrated polypropylene rope of uncertain breaking strain. Starting over, I would be looking at Dyneema stronger than the highest rated weak link needed, and the main cable should rarely if ever break. For reverse pulley, I would look at the Cotswold type but incorporate a flat part of the "pulley" with an anvil in line with the pivot, like the Essex set up. The spring loaded chisel would go through the hollow pivot shaft. For the benefit of those who have not seen a pulley system, it needs to pivot about a horizontal axle, and to swing to some extent, to equalise the angles and allow the cable to run true from the glider (which might be to one side of the runway, e.g. in a cross wind), into the top of the pulley, and out from the bottom to the tow vehicle. Chris N. __________________________________________________ _________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Frank Whiteley wrote: Rusty wrote: Hello All: With the price of fuel going up and the price of AeroTows close behind it I think the need to follow the lead of our brethren in the UK is close at hand. I have heard talk of the infamous $100.00 tow and know that I for one can't afford it, I have to work for a living as do most of you! I and some of my fellow pilots are wanting to start a new club and are want to use winch, auto tows and reverse pulley launching exclusively. Let's discuss the different aspects of ground launching as the only thing that will save our sport and make it inviting once again to new students. Thanks Rusty http://groups.yahoo.com/group/winchdesign/ Many of the issues are discuseed here and there are some archival files/images to review. I'm quite happy to carry on here or in the group. There are a few stumbling blocks to ground launching, but most can be overcome. Space is definitely one. If your launch rope can span 4000ft or more, it's very attractive. Others have done with less distance. Location helps. Thinking outside the box helps also. So, where are you? Appears you may be in Texas. That could be fortunate as there are some ground launch activities there, in case pilot and instructor qualifications are needed. If you are seriously considering starting a club in the US, have a look here http://www.soarcsa.org/ssa/clubs/2005_start_here.htm Frank Whiteley SSA Clubs & Chapters Committee member CSA Winchmeister ..... Thinking outside the box helps also.... Frank, well said! Many folks in the club I recently left in NE Ohio where dead set against any kind of ground launching for they had heard how dangerous it is and that you can not soar away out of a winch launch. Most of the nay-sayers had never ground launched nor had they seen a modern winch in action. I think the main obstacle for introducing winch- or ground launching in the US is to change the perception of what a modern winch is capable of and at what cost at that. 'Folks - It ain't your daddy's Gehrlein winch anymore!!' Anybody interested feel free to read up on that issue at (or join) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/winchdesign/ . I think we have collected the most comprehensive set of information regarding winch launching in the last year and a half from practical 'how to' knowledge to all sorts of theoretical papers on the physics of a winch launch. Lets get to work! Uli Neumann |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
GM wrote:
Many folks in the club I recently left in NE Ohio where dead set against any kind of ground launching for they had heard how dangerous Frankly, winch launching *is* dangerous if don't have the required knowledge and aren't dead serious about it. But that's nothing new in aviation. it is and that you can not soar away out of a winch launch. This depends on your location. If you think of introducing winch operation at your site, then I suggest you take the following steps. 1. Answer the following questions: How long will the cable be? How much height can be achieved with this cable lenghth? Is this enough to get away? (Always, sometimes, rarely). 2. Is a winch operation feasable at your site at all? (It mixes poorely with scheduled Airliers.) 3. Calculate the cost. 4. Two or three pilots go somewhere where they have a winch operation. Try it. Talk to them. 5. Best would be if you could hire a winch for a weekend at your place. Together with the winch operator, of course, and a flight instructor. Maybe obsolete if step 4 includes enough pilots. 6. Based on that experience, decide. 7. Most important: If you decide pro winch, get proper istruction, or you *will* have fatalities. (Not panicking, I love winch launches. But they *are* serious.) Stefan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, you need a drogue, at least for piano wire cable. If not, it drops
into a terrible snarl-up. Dyneema/Spectra, I don't know - ask people who have tried it. For lengths and hardware on the cable, I have seen many different variations. The most complex was at Dunstable, UK some years ago, which included many features for which I could understand the reason, including a long shock rope between drogue and rings. I believe that the safest arrangement is short (2-6 feet), plastic-tube-covered strop from Tost rings to Tost weak link; weak link with easy-change connections; long strop (30-80 feet) from weak link to drogue (to keep billowing drogue well in front of glider in a power failure situation); swivel; and then main cable. It is an official BGA "Recommended Practice" that the shock rope should be stiffened with plastic hose or similar, to prevent it wrapping round the wheel axle and being unable to release. There are, however, many more aspects of the hardware that could usefully be standardised, or at least listed for guidance so that if people do something different it should be a conscious decision with good reason, not just ignorance or lack of experience. No doubt someone from Dunstable will correct the following if I got it wrong or it has changed, but my notes of their assembly were as follows, starting at the glider end: 1. Tost rings 2. wire rope a few feet long. 3. ferrule to secure end of 2 into a loop. 4. plastic hose over 2. 5. ferrule to secure other end of 2 into a loop. 6. oval link with flat section on one side. 7. quick-release hook mating with 6. 8. shackle. 9. weak link assembly. 10. shackle. 11. shock rope about 80 feet long. 12. shackle. 13. triangular ring on end of drogue. 14. drogue. 15. metal end fitting on drogue. 16. shackle. 17. plate on shackle to take the wear. 18. swivel. 19. shackle. 20. oval link with flat section on one side. 21. quick-release hook mating with 20. 22. loop of main winch cable. 23. first ferrule securing 22. 24. plate on loop to take the wear. 25. second ferrule securing 22 and 24. Most of the hardware is standard off-the shelf stuff. The "plate . . . to take the wear" looked like a special, and it was oval, about 2x3 inches and 1/4 inch thick (50x75 mm, 6 mm thick) and had two holes through which the legs of the shackle projected. It had the effect of being the largest diameter thing on the assembly, so would be the one to take the wear from running over the ground, hence protecting swivel etc.. I hope this helps. Chris N. __________________________________________________ _________ Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chris Nicholas wrote: 16 gauge piano wire sounds remarkably thin, unless it was a special high tensile type. Cotsold GC and Essex GC in the UK used 13 gauge (easier than 11 gauge to handle, join, etc. but prone to breaks) or later 11 gauge (rarely broke, but harder to tie knots, and needed larger pulley diameter for reverse pulley). The large diameters required led to Cotswold going for a non-rotating "pulley" made up from lots of small rollers round its rim (but it had no guillotine). Essex used two large rollers, lots of inertia, but it enabled a flat anvil to be between them so that a spring-loaded chisel could be released to cut the cable in emergency. Before reverse pulley, Essex used 13 gauge for straight autotow. It often broke. Theoretically, the weak link should be weaker than the cable, but we were using uncalibrated polypropylene rope of uncertain breaking strain. Starting over, I would be looking at Dyneema stronger than the highest rated weak link needed, and the main cable should rarely if ever break. For reverse pulley, I would look at the Cotswold type but incorporate a flat part of the "pulley" with an anvil in line with the pivot, like the Essex set up. The spring loaded chisel would go through the hollow pivot shaft. For the benefit of those who have not seen a pulley system, it needs to pivot about a horizontal axle, and to swing to some extent, to equalise the angles and allow the cable to run true from the glider (which might be to one side of the runway, e.g. in a cross wind), into the top of the pulley, and out from the bottom to the tow vehicle. Chris N. When using steel wire and wheels/pulleys, the diameter of the wheels/pulleys should be 60 times the diameter of the wire to prevent work hardening. That's why 7/7 wire rope works with much small diameter rollers and guides on winches. See http://tinyurl.com/c3pd5 Frank Whiteley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Got my ground instructor ratings | Yossarian | Piloting | 7 | July 6th 05 02:21 AM |
Switching to ground.... | David Rind | Piloting | 85 | April 16th 04 06:53 PM |
ADV: CPA Mountain Flying Course 2004 Dates | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | February 13th 04 04:30 AM |
Wing in Ground Effect? | BllFs6 | Home Built | 10 | December 18th 03 05:11 AM |
Antenna Ground Plane Grounding | Fastglasair | Home Built | 1 | July 8th 03 05:21 PM |